🚨 [security] Update rails 6.1.7.10 β†’ 8.1.3.1 (major)


🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!


Here is everything you need to know about this upgrade. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ rails (6.1.7.10 β†’ 8.1.3.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Rails has possible XSS Vulnerability in Action Controller

Possible XSS Vulnerability in Action Controller

There is a possible XSS vulnerability when using the translation helpers
(translate, t, etc) in Action Controller. This vulnerability has been
assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-26143.

Versions Affected: >= 7.0.0.
Not affected: < 7.0.0
Fixed Versions: 7.1.3.1, 7.0.8.1

Impact

Applications using translation methods like translate, or t on a
controller, with a key ending in "_html", a :default key which contains
untrusted user input, and the resulting string is used in a view, may be
susceptible to an XSS vulnerability.

For example, impacted code will look something like this:

class ArticlesController < ApplicationController
  def show  
    @message = t("message_html", default: untrusted_input)
    # The `show` template displays the contents of `@message`
  end
end

To reiterate the pre-conditions, applications must:

  • Use a translation function from a controller (i.e. not I18n.t, or t from
    a view)
  • Use a key that ends in _html
  • Use a default value where the default value is untrusted and unescaped input
  • Send the text to the victim (whether that's part of a template, or a
    render call)

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the
workarounds immediately.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.

Patches

To aid users who aren't able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for
the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a
single changeset.

  • 7-0-translate-xss.patch - Patch for 7.0 series
  • 7-1-translate-xss.patch - Patch for 7.1 series

Credits

Thanks to ooooooo_q for the patch and fix!

🚨 Rails has possible XSS Vulnerability in Action Controller

Possible XSS Vulnerability in Action Controller

There is a possible XSS vulnerability when using the translation helpers
(translate, t, etc) in Action Controller. This vulnerability has been
assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-26143.

Versions Affected: >= 7.0.0.
Not affected: < 7.0.0
Fixed Versions: 7.1.3.1, 7.0.8.1

Impact

Applications using translation methods like translate, or t on a
controller, with a key ending in "_html", a :default key which contains
untrusted user input, and the resulting string is used in a view, may be
susceptible to an XSS vulnerability.

For example, impacted code will look something like this:

class ArticlesController < ApplicationController
  def show  
    @message = t("message_html", default: untrusted_input)
    # The `show` template displays the contents of `@message`
  end
end

To reiterate the pre-conditions, applications must:

  • Use a translation function from a controller (i.e. not I18n.t, or t from
    a view)
  • Use a key that ends in _html
  • Use a default value where the default value is untrusted and unescaped input
  • Send the text to the victim (whether that's part of a template, or a
    render call)

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the
workarounds immediately.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.

Patches

To aid users who aren't able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for
the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a
single changeset.

  • 7-0-translate-xss.patch - Patch for 7.0 series
  • 7-1-translate-xss.patch - Patch for 7.1 series

Credits

Thanks to ooooooo_q for the patch and fix!

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

✳️ actionpack (6.1.7.10 β†’ 8.1.3.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Rails has a possible XSS vulnerability in its Action Pack debug exceptions

Impact

The debug exceptions page does not properly escape exception messages. A carefully crafted exception message could inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript into the page, leading to XSS. This affects applications with detailed exception pages enabled (config.consider_all_requests_local = true), which is the default in development.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher fbettag.

🚨 Possible Content Security Policy bypass in Action Dispatch

There is a possible Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the content_security_policy helper in Action Pack.

Impact

Applications which set Content-Security-Policy (CSP) headers dynamically from untrusted user input may be vulnerable to carefully crafted inputs being able to inject new directives into the CSP. This could lead to a bypass of the CSP and its protection against XSS and other attacks.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Applications can avoid setting CSP headers dynamically from untrusted input, or can validate/sanitize that input.

Credits

Thanks to ryotak for the report!

🚨 Possible Content Security Policy bypass in Action Dispatch

There is a possible Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the content_security_policy helper in Action Pack.

Impact

Applications which set Content-Security-Policy (CSP) headers dynamically from untrusted user input may be vulnerable to carefully crafted inputs being able to inject new directives into the CSP. This could lead to a bypass of the CSP and its protection against XSS and other attacks.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Applications can avoid setting CSP headers dynamically from untrusted input, or can validate/sanitize that input.

Credits

Thanks to ryotak for the report!

🚨 Possible Content Security Policy bypass in Action Dispatch

There is a possible Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the content_security_policy helper in Action Pack.

Impact

Applications which set Content-Security-Policy (CSP) headers dynamically from untrusted user input may be vulnerable to carefully crafted inputs being able to inject new directives into the CSP. This could lead to a bypass of the CSP and its protection against XSS and other attacks.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Applications can avoid setting CSP headers dynamically from untrusted input, or can validate/sanitize that input.

Credits

Thanks to ryotak for the report!

🚨 Possible Content Security Policy bypass in Action Dispatch

There is a possible Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the content_security_policy helper in Action Pack.

Impact

Applications which set Content-Security-Policy (CSP) headers dynamically from untrusted user input may be vulnerable to carefully crafted inputs being able to inject new directives into the CSP. This could lead to a bypass of the CSP and its protection against XSS and other attacks.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Applications can avoid setting CSP headers dynamically from untrusted input, or can validate/sanitize that input.

Credits

Thanks to ryotak for the report!

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in HTTP Token authentication in Action Controller

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in Action Controller's HTTP Token authentication. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-47887.

Impact

For applications using HTTP Token authentication via authenticate_or_request_with_http_token or similar, a carefully crafted header may cause header parsing to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 depends on Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users on Ruby 3.2 are unaffected by this issue.

Credits

Thanks to scyoon for reporting

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in query parameter filtering in Action Dispatch

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the query parameter filtering routines of Action Dispatch. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-41128.

Impact

Carefully crafted query parameters can cause query parameter filtering to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 depends on Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users on Ruby 3.2 are unaffected by this issue.

Credits

Thanks to scyoon for the report and patches!

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in HTTP Token authentication in Action Controller

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in Action Controller's HTTP Token authentication. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-47887.

Impact

For applications using HTTP Token authentication via authenticate_or_request_with_http_token or similar, a carefully crafted header may cause header parsing to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 depends on Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users on Ruby 3.2 are unaffected by this issue.

Credits

Thanks to scyoon for reporting

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in query parameter filtering in Action Dispatch

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the query parameter filtering routines of Action Dispatch. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-41128.

Impact

Carefully crafted query parameters can cause query parameter filtering to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 depends on Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users on Ruby 3.2 are unaffected by this issue.

Credits

Thanks to scyoon for the report and patches!

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in HTTP Token authentication in Action Controller

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in Action Controller's HTTP Token authentication. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-47887.

Impact

For applications using HTTP Token authentication via authenticate_or_request_with_http_token or similar, a carefully crafted header may cause header parsing to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 depends on Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users on Ruby 3.2 are unaffected by this issue.

Credits

Thanks to scyoon for reporting

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in query parameter filtering in Action Dispatch

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the query parameter filtering routines of Action Dispatch. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-41128.

Impact

Carefully crafted query parameters can cause query parameter filtering to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 depends on Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users on Ruby 3.2 are unaffected by this issue.

Credits

Thanks to scyoon for the report and patches!

🚨 Missing security headers in Action Pack on non-HTML responses

Permissions-Policy is Only Served on HTML Content-Type

The application configurable Permissions-Policy is only served on responses
with an HTML related Content-Type.

This has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-28103.

Versions Affected: >= 6.1.0
Not affected: < 6.1.0
Fixed Versions: 6.1.7.8, 7.0.8.4, and 7.1.3.4

Impact

Responses with a non-HTML Content-Type are not serving the configured Permissions-Policy. There are certain non-HTML Content-Types that would benefit from having the Permissions-Policy enforced.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

N/A

Patches

To aid users who aren't able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for
the supported release series in accordance with our
maintenance policy
regarding security issues. They are in git-am format and consist of a
single changeset.

  • 6-1-include-permissions-policy-header-on-non-html.patch - Patch for 6.1 series
  • 7-0-include-permissions-policy-header-on-non-html.patch - Patch for 7.0 series
  • 7-1-include-permissions-policy-header-on-non-html.patch - Patch for 7.1 series

Credits

Thank you shinkbr for reporting this!

🚨 Missing security headers in Action Pack on non-HTML responses

Permissions-Policy is Only Served on HTML Content-Type

The application configurable Permissions-Policy is only served on responses
with an HTML related Content-Type.

This has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-28103.

Versions Affected: >= 6.1.0
Not affected: < 6.1.0
Fixed Versions: 6.1.7.8, 7.0.8.4, and 7.1.3.4

Impact

Responses with a non-HTML Content-Type are not serving the configured Permissions-Policy. There are certain non-HTML Content-Types that would benefit from having the Permissions-Policy enforced.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

N/A

Patches

To aid users who aren't able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for
the supported release series in accordance with our
maintenance policy
regarding security issues. They are in git-am format and consist of a
single changeset.

  • 6-1-include-permissions-policy-header-on-non-html.patch - Patch for 6.1 series
  • 7-0-include-permissions-policy-header-on-non-html.patch - Patch for 7.0 series
  • 7-1-include-permissions-policy-header-on-non-html.patch - Patch for 7.1 series

Credits

Thank you shinkbr for reporting this!

🚨 Rails has possible XSS Vulnerability in Action Controller

Possible XSS Vulnerability in Action Controller

There is a possible XSS vulnerability when using the translation helpers
(translate, t, etc) in Action Controller. This vulnerability has been
assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-26143.

Versions Affected: >= 7.0.0.
Not affected: < 7.0.0
Fixed Versions: 7.1.3.1, 7.0.8.1

Impact

Applications using translation methods like translate, or t on a
controller, with a key ending in "_html", a :default key which contains
untrusted user input, and the resulting string is used in a view, may be
susceptible to an XSS vulnerability.

For example, impacted code will look something like this:

class ArticlesController < ApplicationController
  def show  
    @message = t("message_html", default: untrusted_input)
    # The `show` template displays the contents of `@message`
  end
end

To reiterate the pre-conditions, applications must:

  • Use a translation function from a controller (i.e. not I18n.t, or t from
    a view)
  • Use a key that ends in _html
  • Use a default value where the default value is untrusted and unescaped input
  • Send the text to the victim (whether that's part of a template, or a
    render call)

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the
workarounds immediately.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.

Patches

To aid users who aren't able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for
the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a
single changeset.

  • 7-0-translate-xss.patch - Patch for 7.0 series
  • 7-1-translate-xss.patch - Patch for 7.1 series

Credits

Thanks to ooooooo_q for the patch and fix!

🚨 Rails has possible XSS Vulnerability in Action Controller

Possible XSS Vulnerability in Action Controller

There is a possible XSS vulnerability when using the translation helpers
(translate, t, etc) in Action Controller. This vulnerability has been
assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-26143.

Versions Affected: >= 7.0.0.
Not affected: < 7.0.0
Fixed Versions: 7.1.3.1, 7.0.8.1

Impact

Applications using translation methods like translate, or t on a
controller, with a key ending in "_html", a :default key which contains
untrusted user input, and the resulting string is used in a view, may be
susceptible to an XSS vulnerability.

For example, impacted code will look something like this:

class ArticlesController < ApplicationController
  def show  
    @message = t("message_html", default: untrusted_input)
    # The `show` template displays the contents of `@message`
  end
end

To reiterate the pre-conditions, applications must:

  • Use a translation function from a controller (i.e. not I18n.t, or t from
    a view)
  • Use a key that ends in _html
  • Use a default value where the default value is untrusted and unescaped input
  • Send the text to the victim (whether that's part of a template, or a
    render call)

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the
workarounds immediately.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.

Patches

To aid users who aren't able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for
the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a
single changeset.

  • 7-0-translate-xss.patch - Patch for 7.0 series
  • 7-1-translate-xss.patch - Patch for 7.1 series

Credits

Thanks to ooooooo_q for the patch and fix!

🚨 Rails has possible ReDoS vulnerability in Accept header parsing in Action Dispatch

Possible ReDoS vulnerability in Accept header parsing in Action Dispatch

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the Accept header parsing routines
of Action Dispatch. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier
CVE-2024-26142.

Versions Affected: >= 7.1.0, < 7.1.3.1
Not affected: < 7.1.0
Fixed Versions: 7.1.3.1

Impact

Carefully crafted Accept headers can cause Accept header parsing in Action
Dispatch to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS
vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or
use one of the workarounds immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby
3.2 or newer are unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.

Patches

To aid users who aren't able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for
the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a
single changeset.

  • 7-1-accept-redox.patch - Patch for 7.1 series

Credits

Thanks svalkanov for the report and patch!

🚨 Actionpack has possible cross-site scripting vulnerability via User Supplied Values to redirect_to

The redirect_to method in Rails allows provided values to contain characters which are not legal in an HTTP header value. This results in the potential for downstream services which enforce RFC compliance on HTTP response headers to remove the assigned Location header. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-28362.

Versions Affected: All. Not affected: None Fixed Versions: 7.0.5.1, 6.1.7.4

Impact

This introduces the potential for a Cross-site-scripting (XSS) payload to be delivered on the now static redirection page. Note that this both requires user interaction and for a Rails app to be configured to allow redirects to external hosts (defaults to false in Rails >= 7.0.x).

Releases

The FIXED releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Avoid providing user supplied URLs with arbitrary schemes to the redirect_to method.

🚨 ReDoS based DoS vulnerability in Action Dispatch

There is a possible regular expression based DoS vulnerability in Action Dispatch. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-22792.

Versions Affected: >= 3.0.0 Not affected: < 3.0.0 Fixed Versions: 5.2.8.15 (Rails LTS), 6.1.7.1, 7.0.4.1
Impact

Specially crafted cookies, in combination with a specially crafted X_FORWARDED_HOST header can cause the regular expression engine to enter a state of catastrophic backtracking. This can cause the process to use large amounts of CPU and memory, leading to a possible DoS vulnerability All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.
Releases

The FIXED releases are available at the normal locations.
Workarounds

We recommend that all users upgrade to one of the FIXED versions. In the meantime, users can mitigate this vulnerability by using a load balancer or other device to filter out malicious X_FORWARDED_HOST headers before they reach the application.
Patches

To aid users who aren’t able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.

6-1-Use-string-split-instead-of-regex-for-domain-parts.patch - Patch for 6.1 series
7-0-Use-string-split-instead-of-regex-for-domain-parts.patch - Patch for 7.0 series

Please note that only the 7.0.Z and 6.1.Z series are supported at present, and 6.0.Z for severe vulnerabilities. Users of earlier unsupported releases are advised to upgrade as soon as possible as we cannot guarantee the continued availability of security fixes for unsupported releases.

https://rubyonrails.org/2023/1/17/Rails-Versions-6-0-6-1-6-1-7-1-7-0-4-1-have-been-released

🚨 Open Redirect Vulnerability in Action Pack

There is a vulnerability in Action Controller’s redirect_to. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-22797.

Versions Affected: >= 7.0.0 Not affected: < 7.0.0 Fixed Versions: 7.0.4.1
Impact

There is a possible open redirect when using the redirect_to helper with untrusted user input.

Vulnerable code will look like this:

redirect_to(params[:some_param])

Rails 7.0 introduced protection against open redirects from calling redirect_to with untrusted user input. In prior versions the developer was fully responsible for only providing trusted input. However the check introduced could be bypassed by a carefully crafted URL.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.
Releases

The FIXED releases are available at the normal locations.
Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.
Patches

To aid users who aren’t able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.

7-0-Fix-sec-issue-with-_url_host_allowed.patch - Patch for 7.0 series

Please note that only the 7.0.Z and 6.1.Z series are supported at present, and 6.0.Z for severe vulnerabilities. Users of earlier unsupported releases are advised to upgrade as soon as possible as we cannot guarantee the continued availability of security fixes for unsupported releases.

🚨 ReDoS based DoS vulnerability in Action Dispatch

There is a possible regular expression based DoS vulnerability in Action Dispatch related to the If-None-Match header. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-22795.

Versions Affected: All Not affected: None Fixed Versions: 5.2.8.15 (Rails LTS), 6.1.7.1, 7.0.4.1

Impact

A specially crafted HTTP If-None-Match header can cause the regular expression engine to enter a state of catastrophic backtracking, when on a version of Ruby below 3.2.0. This can cause the process to use large amounts of CPU and memory, leading to a possible DoS vulnerability All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.
Releases

The FIXED releases are available at the normal locations.
Workarounds

We recommend that all users upgrade to one of the FIXED versions. In the meantime, users can mitigate this vulnerability by using a load balancer or other device to filter out malicious If-None-Match headers before they reach the application.

Users on Ruby 3.2.0 or greater are not affected by this vulnerability.
Patches

To aid users who aren’t able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.

6-1-Avoid-regex-backtracking-on-If-None-Match-header.patch - Patch for 6.1 series
7-0-Avoid-regex-backtracking-on-If-None-Match-header.patch - Patch for 7.0 series

Please note that only the 7.0.Z and 6.1.Z series are supported at present, and 6.0.Z for severe vulnerabilities. Users of earlier unsupported releases are advised to upgrade as soon as possible as we cannot guarantee the continued availability of security fixes for unsupported releases.

🚨 Cross-site Scripting Vulnerability in Action Pack

There is a possible XSS vulnerability in Rails / Action Pack. This vulnerability has been
assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-22577.

Versions Affected: >= 5.2.0
Not affected: < 5.2.0
Fixed Versions: 7.0.2.4, 6.1.5.1, 6.0.4.8, 5.2.7.1

Impact

CSP headers were only sent along with responses that Rails considered as
"HTML" responses. This left API requests without CSP headers, which could
possibly expose users to XSS attacks.

Releases

The FIXED releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Set a CSP for your API responses manually.

🚨 Exposure of information in Action Pack

Impact

Under certain circumstances response bodies will not be closed, for example a bug in a webserver or a bug in a Rack middleware. In the event a response is not notified of a close, ActionDispatch::Executor will not know to reset thread local state for the next request. This can lead to data being leaked to subsequent requests, especially when interacting with ActiveSupport::CurrentAttributes.

Upgrading to the FIXED versions of Rails will ensure mitigation of this issue even in the context of a buggy webserver or middleware implementation.

Patches

This has been fixed in Rails 7.0.2.2, 6.1.4.6, 6.0.4.6, and 5.2.6.2.

Workarounds

Upgrading is highly recommended, but to work around this problem the following middleware can be used:

class GuardedExecutor < ActionDispatch::Executor
  def call(env)
    ensure_completed!
    super
  end

  private

    def ensure_completed!
      @executor.new.complete! if @executor.active?
    end
end

# Ensure the guard is inserted before ActionDispatch::Executor
Rails.application.configure do
  config.middleware.swap ActionDispatch::Executor, GuardedExecutor, executor
end
Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

✳️ activesupport (6.1.7.10 β†’ 8.1.3.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Rails Active Support has a possible DoS vulnerability in its number helpers

Impact

Active Support number helpers accept strings containing scientific notation (e.g. 1e10000), which when converted to a string could be expanded into extremely large decimal representations. This can cause excessive memory allocation and CPU consumption when the expanded number is formatted, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher manun.

🚨 Rails Active Support has a possible DoS vulnerability in its number helpers

Impact

Active Support number helpers accept strings containing scientific notation (e.g. 1e10000), which when converted to a string could be expanded into extremely large decimal representations. This can cause excessive memory allocation and CPU consumption when the expanded number is formatted, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher manun.

🚨 Rails Active Support has a possible ReDoS vulnerability in number_to_delimited

Impact

NumberToDelimitedConverter used a regular expression with gsub! to insert thousands delimiters. This could produce quadratic time complexity on long digit strings.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher scyoon.

🚨 Rails Active Support has a possible XSS vulnerability in SafeBuffer#%

Impact

SafeBuffer#% does not propagate the @html_unsafe flag to the newly created buffer. If a SafeBuffer is mutated in place (e.g. via gsub!) and then formatted with % using untrusted arguments, the result incorrectly reports html_safe? == true, bypassing ERB auto-escaping and possibly leading to XSS.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by @ch4n3-yoon

🚨 Rails Active Support has a possible ReDoS vulnerability in number_to_delimited

Impact

NumberToDelimitedConverter used a regular expression with gsub! to insert thousands delimiters. This could produce quadratic time complexity on long digit strings.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher scyoon.

🚨 Rails Active Support has a possible XSS vulnerability in SafeBuffer#%

Impact

SafeBuffer#% does not propagate the @html_unsafe flag to the newly created buffer. If a SafeBuffer is mutated in place (e.g. via gsub!) and then formatted with % using untrusted arguments, the result incorrectly reports html_safe? == true, bypassing ERB auto-escaping and possibly leading to XSS.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by @ch4n3-yoon

🚨 Rails Active Support has a possible DoS vulnerability in its number helpers

Impact

Active Support number helpers accept strings containing scientific notation (e.g. 1e10000), which when converted to a string could be expanded into extremely large decimal representations. This can cause excessive memory allocation and CPU consumption when the expanded number is formatted, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher manun.

🚨 Rails Active Support has a possible ReDoS vulnerability in number_to_delimited

Impact

NumberToDelimitedConverter used a regular expression with gsub! to insert thousands delimiters. This could produce quadratic time complexity on long digit strings.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher scyoon.

🚨 Rails Active Support has a possible XSS vulnerability in SafeBuffer#%

Impact

SafeBuffer#% does not propagate the @html_unsafe flag to the newly created buffer. If a SafeBuffer is mutated in place (e.g. via gsub!) and then formatted with % using untrusted arguments, the result incorrectly reports html_safe? == true, bypassing ERB auto-escaping and possibly leading to XSS.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by @ch4n3-yoon

🚨 Active Support Possibly Discloses Locally Encrypted Files

There is a possible file disclosure of locally encrypted files in Active Support. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-38037.

Versions Affected: >= 5.2.0 Not affected: < 5.2.0 Fixed Versions: 7.0.7.1, 6.1.7.5

Impact

ActiveSupport::EncryptedFile writes contents that will be encrypted to a temporary file. The temporary file’s permissions are defaulted to the user’s current umask settings, meaning that it’s possible for other users on the same system to read the contents of the temporary file.

Attackers that have access to the file system could possibly read the contents of this temporary file while a user is editing it.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

To work around this issue, you can set your umask to be more restrictive like this:

$ umask 0077

🚨 Possible XSS Security Vulnerability in SafeBuffer#bytesplice

There is a vulnerability in ActiveSupport if the new bytesplice method is called on a SafeBuffer with untrusted user input.
This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-28120.

Versions Affected: All. Not affected: None Fixed Versions: 7.0.4.3, 6.1.7.3

Impact

ActiveSupport uses the SafeBuffer string subclass to tag strings as html_safe after they have been sanitized.
When these strings are mutated, the tag is should be removed to mark them as no longer being html_safe.

Ruby 3.2 introduced a new bytesplice method which ActiveSupport did not yet understand to be a mutation.
Users on older versions of Ruby are likely unaffected.

All users running an affected release and using bytesplice should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.

Workarounds

Avoid calling bytesplice on a SafeBuffer (html_safe) string with untrusted user input.

🚨 ReDoS based DoS vulnerability in Active Support's underscore

There is a possible regular expression based DoS vulnerability in Active Support. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-22796.

Versions Affected: All Not affected: None Fixed Versions: 5.2.8.15 (Rails LTS, which is a paid service and not part of the rubygem), 6.1.7.1, 7.0.4.1
Impact

A specially crafted string passed to the underscore method can cause the regular expression engine to enter a state of catastrophic backtracking. This can cause the process to use large amounts of CPU and memory, leading to a possible DoS vulnerability.

This affects String#underscore, ActiveSupport::Inflector.underscore, String#titleize, and any other methods using these.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.
Releases

The FIXED releases are available at the normal locations.
Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.

Users on Ruby 3.2.0 or greater may be able to reduce the impact by configuring Regexp.timeout.
Patches

To aid users who aren’t able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.

6-1-Avoid-regex-backtracking-in-Inflector.underscore.patch - Patch for 6.1 series
7-0-Avoid-regex-backtracking-in-Inflector.underscore.patch - Patch for 7.0 series

Please note that only the 7.0.Z and 6.1.Z series are supported at present, and 6.0.Z for severe vulnerabilities. Users of earlier unsupported releases are advised to upgrade as soon as possible as we cannot guarantee the continued availability of security fixes for unsupported releases.

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

✳️ minitest (5.25.5 β†’ 5.27.0) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Release Notes

5.27.0 (from changelog)

  • 1 major enhancement:

    • Adding post install message announcing the EOL for minitest 5!

  • 2 minor enhancements:

    • Removed TestTask::Work#initialize since Queue can now initialize with an Enumerable! AMAZING!

    • Use Kernel#warn uplevel argument for nicer warnings. (byroot)

  • 5 bug fixes:

    • Cleaned up option aliasing a tad.

    • Removed obsolete conditional for prerecord

    • Removed obsolete guards around Warning.

    • Removed obsolete version guards for pattern matching assertions.

    • Switched all internal requires to require_relative.

5.26.2 (from changelog)

  • 5 bug fixes:

    • Bumped minimum ruby to 3.1.

    • Alias Spec#name to #inspect for cleaner output in repls.

    • Fix pathing for Hoe::Minitest initialization to be more generic.

    • Fixed refute_in_epsilon to use min of abs values. (wtn)

    • Improved options processing and usage output to be more clear.

5.26.1 (from changelog)

The Ocean Shores, Slightly Less Tipsy Edition!

  • 3 bug fixes:

    • Add links to API doco in README.

    • Add missing require thread.

    • Bumped ruby version to include 4.0 (trunk). (hsbt) (see also 5.14.2)

5.26.0 (from changelog)

The Seattle.rb Nerd Party, Slightly Tipsy Edition!

  • 2 minor enhancements:

    • Added extra documentation to Minitest::TestTask options.

    • Make parallelize_me! a no-op when n_threads=1.

  • 9 bug fixes:

    • Bypass parallel_executor entirely when n_threads=1.

    • Don’t require rubygems in Rakefile… it is 2025.

    • Ensure that minitest exits non-zero on Interrupt. (tavianator)

    • Fix Minitest.run sequence rdoc to include loop vars and read consistently.

    • Fix call to parallel_executor.shutdown when it isn’t defined.

    • Removed some 1.8/1.9-based code from the assertions and expectations.

    • Still fighting with rdoc? Yup. Still fighting with rdoc…

    • Switched assert_equal’s diff from Tempfile.open to Tempfile.create.

    • Use Regexp.escape for BASE_RE in case pwd has special chars. (astra_1993)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 44 commits:

✳️ rake (13.0.6 β†’ 13.4.2) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Release Notes

13.4.2

What's Changed

  • Preserve ENV["TESTOPTS"] when verbose is enabled by @hsbt in #723

Full Changelog: v13.4.1...v13.4.2

13.4.1

What's Changed

  • Add lib/rake/options.rb to gemspec by @hsbt in #721

Full Changelog: v13.4.0...v13.4.1

13.4.0

What's Changed

  • refactor: fix ambiguous regexp / assertion in one of the tests by @pvdb in #667
  • Fix RDoc formatting in doc/command_line_usage.rdoc by @hsbt in #693
  • Document implicit file tasks by @hsbt in #692
  • Show chdir option as a command by @nobu in #552
  • Verbose console by @kaiquekandykoga in #394
  • Align example with text by @henrebotha in #632
  • Allow accept multiple files to TEST env var by @Yegorov in #712
  • Replace Rake's Win32-specific logic with a 100% equivalent, pure-Ruby implementation by @pvdb in #669
  • Add Options class and switch Application to use it instead of anonymous Struct by @hsbt in #694
  • Accept Pathname object as rule's prerequisite by @gemmaro in #528
  • Dedupe and simplify standard_system_dir by @pvdb in #713

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v13.3.1...v13.4.0

13.3.1

What's Changed

  • Remove useless condition check by @DormancyWang in #636
  • Added document for RAKEOPT by @hsbt in #639
  • lewagon/wait-on-check-action didn't need bot token by @hsbt in #642
  • Fixed wrong name of environmental variable by @hsbt in #643
  • The old Ruby version of Windows is broken by @hsbt in #647
  • Avoid to use it by @hsbt in #650
  • Fixed assertion result with the latest stable version of JRuby by @hsbt in #655
  • Fixup test_load_error_raised_implicitly with JRuby by @hsbt in #657
  • Set source_code_uri metadata to this gem's public repo URL by @amatsuda in #662
  • Fix TaskArguments#deconstruct_keys with keys = nil by @nevans in #635
  • refactor: only include lib in $LOAD_PATH if not included yet by @pvdb in #610
  • silence warnings during execution of rake tasks in Rakefile (ex: rake test) by @luke-gru in #483

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v13.3.0...v13.3.1

13.3.0

What's Changed

  • Add missing changelog by @VitaliySerov in #555
  • Exclude 2.3-2.5 on macos-14 iamge by @hsbt in #563
  • Use require_relative in the Rake codebase by @koic in #566
  • Provide a 'Changelog' link on rubygems.org/gems/rake by @mark-young-atg in #572
  • Remove dependency on win32ole by @Earlopain in #573
  • Switch changelog_uri to releases tab by @fynsta in #577
  • chore: refactor/reformat the heredocs (in tests) ... by @pvdb in #589
  • chore: remove $trace global variable / option by @pvdb in #592
  • Link to Jim's last rake commit (not the git tree with that SHA) by @pvdb in #593
  • chore: refactor how temporary files are created (in tests) by @pvdb in #590
  • refactor: use $LOADED_FEATURES built-in instead of $" by @pvdb in #605
  • refactor: remove "exposed" @system_dir instance variable (in helper method) by @pvdb in #604
  • refactor: simplify Rake::Application#system_dir method by @pvdb in #591
  • Remove unused argument by @takmar in #623
  • Use latest RDoc release instead of Ruby 3.2's default version by @st0012 in #630
  • Enabled trusted publisher for rubygems.org by @hsbt in #634
  • refactor: use Dir.home to find rake's standard system dir by @pvdb in #608
  • Fix RDoc links in Rake Information section by @komagata in #627
  • refactor: move dependency requires to ruby_runner.rb file by @pvdb in #609
  • Pattern matching support for arguments by @rgarner in #515

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v13.2.1...v13.3.0

13.2.1

What's Changed

  • Suppressed "internal:array:52:in 'Array#each'" from backtrace by @hsbt in #554
  • Bump actions/configure-pages from 4 to 5 by @dependabot in #553

Full Changelog: v13.2.0...v13.2.1

13.2.0

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v13.1.0...v13.2.0

13.1.0

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v13.0.6...v13.1.0

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actioncable (indirect, 6.1.7.10 β†’ 8.1.3.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actionmailbox (indirect, 6.1.7.10 β†’ 8.1.3.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actionmailer (indirect, 6.1.7.10 β†’ 8.1.3.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in block_format in Action Mailer

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the block_format helper in Action Mailer. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-47889.

Impact

Carefully crafted text can cause the block_format helper to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 requires Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users can avoid calling the block_format helper or upgrade to Ruby 3.2

Credits

Thanks to yuki_osaki for the report!

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in block_format in Action Mailer

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the block_format helper in Action Mailer. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-47889.

Impact

Carefully crafted text can cause the block_format helper to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 requires Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users can avoid calling the block_format helper or upgrade to Ruby 3.2

Credits

Thanks to yuki_osaki for the report!

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in block_format in Action Mailer

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the block_format helper in Action Mailer. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-47889.

Impact

Carefully crafted text can cause the block_format helper to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 requires Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users can avoid calling the block_format helper or upgrade to Ruby 3.2

Credits

Thanks to yuki_osaki for the report!

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actiontext (indirect, 6.1.7.10 β†’ 8.1.3.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in plain_text_for_blockquote_node in Action Text

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the plain_text_for_blockquote_node helper in Action Text. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-47888.

Impact

Carefully crafted text can cause the plain_text_for_blockquote_node helper to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 depends on Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users can avoid calling plain_text_for_blockquote_node or upgrade to Ruby 3.2

Credits

Thanks to ooooooo_q for the report!

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in plain_text_for_blockquote_node in Action Text

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the plain_text_for_blockquote_node helper in Action Text. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-47888.

Impact

Carefully crafted text can cause the plain_text_for_blockquote_node helper to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 depends on Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users can avoid calling plain_text_for_blockquote_node or upgrade to Ruby 3.2

Credits

Thanks to ooooooo_q for the report!

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in plain_text_for_blockquote_node in Action Text

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the plain_text_for_blockquote_node helper in Action Text. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-47888.

Impact

Carefully crafted text can cause the plain_text_for_blockquote_node helper to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 depends on Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users can avoid calling plain_text_for_blockquote_node or upgrade to Ruby 3.2

Credits

Thanks to ooooooo_q for the report!

🚨 ActionText ContentAttachment can Contain Unsanitized HTML

Instances of ActionText::Attachable::ContentAttachment included within a rich_text_area tag could potentially contain unsanitized HTML.

This has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-32464.

Versions Affected: >= 7.1.0
Not affected: < 7.1.0
Fixed Versions: 7.1.3.4

Impact

This could lead to a potential cross site scripting issue within the Trix editor.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

N/A

Patches

To aid users who aren't able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the supported release series in accordance with our maintenance policy regarding security issues. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.

  • action_text_content_attachment_xss_7_1_stable.patch - Patch for 7.1 series

Credits

Thank you ooooooo_q for reporting this!

🚨 Trix Editor Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability

The Trix editor, versions prior to 2.1.1, is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution when copying and pasting content from the web or other documents with markup into the editor. The vulnerability stems from improper sanitization of pasted content, allowing an attacker to embed malicious scripts which are executed within the context of the application.

Vulnerable Versions:

  • 1.x series up to and including 1.3.1
  • 2.x series up to and including 2.1.0

Fixed Versions:

  • v1.3.2
  • v2.1.1

Vector:

  • Bug 1: When copying content manipulated by a script, such as:
document.addEventListener('copy', function(e){
  e.clipboardData.setData('text/html', '<div><noscript><div class="123</noscript>456<img src=1 onerror=alert(1)//"></div></noscript></div>');
  e.preventDefault();
});

and pasting into the Trix editor, the script within the content is executed.

  • Bug 2: Similar execution occurs with content structured as:
document.write(`copy<div data-trix-attachment="{&quot;contentType&quot;:&quot;text/html&quot;,&quot;content&quot;:&quot;&lt;img src=1 onerror=alert(101)&gt;HELLO123&quot;}"></div>me`);

Impact:

An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary JavaScript code within the context of the user's session, potentially leading to unauthorized actions being performed or sensitive information being disclosed.

Remediation:

Update Recommendation: Users should upgrade to Trix editor version 2.1.1 or later, which incorporates proper sanitization of input from copied content.

CSP Enhancement: Additionally, enhancing the Content Security Policy (CSP) to disallow inline scripts can significantly mitigate the risk of such vulnerabilities. Set CSP policies such as script-src 'self' to ensure that only scripts hosted on the same origin are executed, and explicitly prohibit inline scripts using script-src-elem.

References:

Credit: These issues were reported by security researchers loknop and pinpie.

🚨 Trix Editor Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability

The Trix editor, versions prior to 2.1.1, is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution when copying and pasting content from the web or other documents with markup into the editor. The vulnerability stems from improper sanitization of pasted content, allowing an attacker to embed malicious scripts which are executed within the context of the application.

Vulnerable Versions:

  • 1.x series up to and including 1.3.1
  • 2.x series up to and including 2.1.0

Fixed Versions:

  • v1.3.2
  • v2.1.1

Vector:

  • Bug 1: When copying content manipulated by a script, such as:
document.addEventListener('copy', function(e){
  e.clipboardData.setData('text/html', '<div><noscript><div class="123</noscript>456<img src=1 onerror=alert(1)//"></div></noscript></div>');
  e.preventDefault();
});

and pasting into the Trix editor, the script within the content is executed.

  • Bug 2: Similar execution occurs with content structured as:
document.write(`copy<div data-trix-attachment="{&quot;contentType&quot;:&quot;text/html&quot;,&quot;content&quot;:&quot;&lt;img src=1 onerror=alert(101)&gt;HELLO123&quot;}"></div>me`);

Impact:

An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary JavaScript code within the context of the user's session, potentially leading to unauthorized actions being performed or sensitive information being disclosed.

Remediation:

Update Recommendation: Users should upgrade to Trix editor version 2.1.1 or later, which incorporates proper sanitization of input from copied content.

CSP Enhancement: Additionally, enhancing the Content Security Policy (CSP) to disallow inline scripts can significantly mitigate the risk of such vulnerabilities. Set CSP policies such as script-src 'self' to ensure that only scripts hosted on the same origin are executed, and explicitly prohibit inline scripts using script-src-elem.

References:

Credit: These issues were reported by security researchers loknop and pinpie.

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ actionview (indirect, 6.1.7.10 β†’ 8.1.3.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Rails has a possible XSS vulnerability in its Action View tag helpers

Impact

When a blank string is used as an HTML attribute name in Action View tag helpers, the attribute escaping is bypassed, producing malformed HTML. A carefully crafted attribute value could then be misinterpreted by the browser as a separate attribute name, possibly leading to XSS. Applications that allow users to specify custom HTML attributes are affected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher taise.

🚨 Rails has a possible XSS vulnerability in its Action View tag helpers

Impact

When a blank string is used as an HTML attribute name in Action View tag helpers, the attribute escaping is bypassed, producing malformed HTML. A carefully crafted attribute value could then be misinterpreted by the browser as a separate attribute name, possibly leading to XSS. Applications that allow users to specify custom HTML attributes are affected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher taise.

🚨 Rails has a possible XSS vulnerability in its Action View tag helpers

Impact

When a blank string is used as an HTML attribute name in Action View tag helpers, the attribute escaping is bypassed, producing malformed HTML. A carefully crafted attribute value could then be misinterpreted by the browser as a separate attribute name, possibly leading to XSS. Applications that allow users to specify custom HTML attributes are affected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher taise.

🚨 rails-ujs vulnerable to DOM Based Cross-site Scripting contenteditable HTML Elements

NOTE: rails-ujs is part of Rails/actionview since 5.1.0.

There is a potential DOM based cross-site scripting issue in rails-ujs
which leverages the Clipboard API to target HTML elements that are
assigned the contenteditable attribute. This has the potential to
occur when pasting malicious HTML content from the clipboard that
includes a data-method, data-remote or data-disable-with attribute.

This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-23913.

Not affected: < 5.1.0
Versions Affected: >= 5.1.0
Fixed Versions: 6.1.7.3, 7.0.4.3

Impact
If the specified malicious HTML clipboard content is provided to a
contenteditable element, this could result in the arbitrary execution
of javascript on the origin in question.

Releases
The FIXED releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds
We recommend that all users upgrade to one of the FIXED versions.
In the meantime, users can attempt to mitigate this vulnerability
by removing the contenteditable attribute from elements in pages
that rails-ujs will interact with.

Patches
To aid users who aren’t able to upgrade immediately we have provided
patches for the two supported release series. They are in git-am
format and consist of a single changeset.

  • rails-ujs-data-method-contenteditable-6-1.patch - Patch for 6.1 series
  • rails-ujs-data-method-contenteditable-7-0.patch - Patch for 7.0 series

Please note that only the 7.0.Z and 6.1.Z series are
supported at present, and 6.0.Z for severe vulnerabilities.

Users of earlier unsupported releases are advised to upgrade as
soon as possible as we cannot guarantee the continued availability
of security fixes for unsupported releases.

Credits
We would like to thank ryotak 15 for reporting this!

  • rails-ujs-data-method-contenteditable-6-1.patch (8.5 KB)
  • rails-ujs-data-method-contenteditable-7-0.patch (8.5 KB)
  • rails-ujs-data-method-contenteditable-main.patch (8.9 KB)

🚨 XSS Vulnerability in Action View tag helpers

There is a possible XSS vulnerability in Action View tag helpers. Passing untrusted input as hash keys can lead to a possible XSS vulnerability. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-27777.

Versions Affected: ALL
Not affected: NONE
Fixed Versions: 7.0.2.4, 6.1.5.1, 6.0.4.8, 5.2.7.1

Impact

If untrusted data is passed as the hash key for tag attributes, there is a possibility that the untrusted data may not be properly escaped which can lead to an XSS vulnerability.

Impacted code will look something like this:

check_box_tag('thename', 'thevalue', false, aria: { malicious_input => 'thevalueofaria' })

Where the "malicious_input" variable contains untrusted data.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.

Releases

The FIXED releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Escape the untrusted data before using it as a key for tag helper methods.

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activejob (indirect, 6.1.7.10 β†’ 8.1.3.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activemodel (indirect, 6.1.7.10 β†’ 8.1.3.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activerecord (indirect, 6.1.7.10 β†’ 8.1.3.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Active Record logging vulnerable to ANSI escape injection

This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2025-55193

Impact

The ID passed to find or similar methods may be logged without escaping. If this is directly to the terminal it may include unescaped ANSI sequences.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credits

Thanks to lio346 from Unit 515 of OPSWAT for reporting this vulnerability

🚨 Active Record logging vulnerable to ANSI escape injection

This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2025-55193

Impact

The ID passed to find or similar methods may be logged without escaping. If this is directly to the terminal it may include unescaped ANSI sequences.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credits

Thanks to lio346 from Unit 515 of OPSWAT for reporting this vulnerability

🚨 Active Record logging vulnerable to ANSI escape injection

This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2025-55193

Impact

The ID passed to find or similar methods may be logged without escaping. If this is directly to the terminal it may include unescaped ANSI sequences.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credits

Thanks to lio346 from Unit 515 of OPSWAT for reporting this vulnerability

🚨 Denial of Service Vulnerability in ActiveRecord's PostgreSQL adapter

There is a potential denial of service vulnerability present in ActiveRecord's PostgreSQL adapter.

This has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-44566.

Versions Affected: All. Not affected: None.

Fixed Versions

  • 2.3.18.47 (Rails LTS, which is a paid service and not part of the rubygem)
  • 3.2.22.34 (Rails LTS, which is a paid service and not part of the rubygem)
  • 4.2.11.27 (Rails LTS, which is a paid service and not part of the rubygem)
  • 5.2.8.15 (Rails LTS, which is a paid service and not part of the rubygem)
  • 6.1.7.1
  • 7.0.4.1

Impact

In ActiveRecord < 7.0.4.1 and < 6.1.7.1, when a value outside the range for a 64bit signed integer is provided to the PostgreSQL connection adapter, it will treat the target column type as numeric. Comparing integer values against numeric values can result in a slow sequential scan resulting in potential Denial of Service.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Ensure that user supplied input which is provided to ActiveRecord clauses do not contain integers wider than a signed 64bit representation or floats.

Patches

To aid users who aren't able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the supported release series in accordance with our maintenance policy 1 regarding security issues. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.

6-1-Added-integer-width-check-to-PostgreSQL-Quoting.patch - Patch for 6.1 series
7-0-Added-integer-width-check-to-PostgreSQL-Quoting.patch - Patch for 7.0 series

🚨 SQL Injection Vulnerability via ActiveRecord comments

There is a possible vulnerability in ActiveRecord related to the sanitization of comments. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-22794.

Versions Affected: >= 6.0.0 Not affected: < 6.0.0 Fixed Versions: 6.0.6.1, 6.1.7.1, 7.0.4.1
Impact

Previously the implementation of escaping for comments was insufficient for

If malicious user input is passed to either the annotate query method, the optimizer_hints query method, or through the QueryLogs interface which automatically adds annotations, it may be sent to the database with insufficient sanitization and be able to inject SQL outside of the comment.

In most cases these interfaces won’t be used with user input and users should avoid doing so.

Example vulnerable code:

Post.where(id: 1).annotate("#{params[:user_input]}")

Post.where(id: 1).optimizer_hints("#{params[:user_input]}")

Example vulnerable QueryLogs configuration (the default configuration is not vulnerable):

config.active_record.query_log_tags = [
  {
    something: -> { <some value including user input> }
  }
]

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.
Releases

The FIXED releases are available at the normal locations.
Workarounds

Avoid passing user input to annotate and avoid using QueryLogs configuration which can include user input.
Patches

To aid users who aren’t able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.

6-0-Make-sanitize_as_sql_comment-more-strict.patch - Patch for 6.0 series
6-1-Make-sanitize_as_sql_comment-more-strict.patch - Patch for 6.1 series
7-0-Make-sanitize_as_sql_comment-more-strict.patch - Patch for 7.0 series

Please note that only the 7.0.Z and 6.1.Z series are supported at present, and 6.0.Z for severe vulnerabilities. Users of earlier unsupported releases are advised to upgrade as soon as possible as we cannot guarantee the continued availability of security fixes for unsupported releases.

🚨 Active Record RCE bug with Serialized Columns

When serialized columns that use YAML (the default) are deserialized, Rails uses YAML.unsafe_load to convert the YAML data in to Ruby objects. If an attacker can manipulate data in the database (via means like SQL injection), then it may be possible for the attacker to escalate to an RCE.

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue, but other coders (such as JSON) are not impacted.

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ activestorage (indirect, 6.1.7.10 β†’ 8.1.3.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Active Storage has possible arbitrary file read and remote code execution in Active Storage variant processing

Impact

In its default configuration, a Rails application that displays image variants may allow an
unauthenticated attacker to read arbitrary files from the server, including the process environment.
That environment typically holds secret_key_base and often credentials for external systems, which
may in turn allow escalation to remote code execution or lateral movement to those systems.

Details

libvips reads and writes file formats through "loaders" and "savers" (or more generally
"operations"), many of which are backed by third-party libraries. It marks some of these operations
as "unfuzzed", meaning they are unsafe for untrusted content, and several handle formats unrelated
to web images. Active Storage did not disable the unfuzzed operations, so an attacker who can upload
a crafted file and cause a variant to be generated from it may be able to invoke one.

We are aware of a mechanism by which an attacker, by uploading a crafted file, is able to cause
disclosure of the contents of arbitrary files accessible on the filesystem of the targeted
application. One specific attack chain has been reported to us (see "Disclosure" below), but we do
not assume it is the only one that exists.

Affected applications

An application is affected if it meets all of these requirements:

  • Uses libvips for Active Storage image processing. This is config.active_storage.variant_processor = :vips,
    which load_defaults 7.0 set and no later default has changed.
  • Allows image uploads from untrusted users.

Generating variants is not a separate requirement.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a fixed version of activestorage.
  • The minimum version of libvips must be upgraded to >= 8.13.
  • Change secret_key_base and change any secrets accessible in the application environment (see "Expire and change secrets" below)

Earlier versions of libvips (< 8.13) cannot disable unfuzzed operations at all, and Active Storage
will raise an exception during boot in such an unsecurable environment.

Expire and change secrets

Upgrading closes the vulnerability but does not undo an exfiltrated secret if that already
occurred. An affected application should treat every secret readable by the application process as
potentially exposed and change it, including:

  • secret_key_base
  • The master key, whether stored in config/master.key or supplied as RAILS_MASTER_KEY, along
    with everything in config/credentials.yml.enc that it decrypts
  • Credentials for the Active Storage service, such as S3, GCS, or Azure keys
  • Database credentials
  • Tokens and keys for any third-party service the application calls

Changing secret_key_base expires active sessions and requires users to log in again. Encrypted
cookies, signed cookies, signed global IDs, and Active Storage URLs are also affected.

Rotation should only be used as an intermediate step if necessary. Do not retain an exposed secret
as a fallback.

Workarounds

If libvips < 8.13 is being used, there are no workarounds available other than removing the
dependency on libvips from the application. Some applications may have ruby-vips declared as a
dependency only for image analysis, and those applications may be able to simply remove ruby-vips
from the Gemfile to remove libvips from the application. Applications that do not use Active Storage
can remove ruby-vips from the Gemfile to avoid the boot-time checks.

If libvips >= 8.13 is present on the system, applications can disable the unfuzzed operations
without upgrading Rails by setting the VIPS_BLOCK_UNTRUSTED environment variable, which libvips
reads while initializing.

Applications also running ruby-vips >= 2.2.1 or later can instead call
Vips.block_untrusted(true) from an initializer.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Versions affected

  • activestorage < 7.2.3.2
  • activestorage >= 8.0, < 8.0.5.1
  • activestorage >= 8.1, < 8.1.3.1

Disclosure

Technical details of the attack chain are intentionally omitted from this advisory. They would add
nothing to an administrator's decision to upgrade, while making it substantially easier to attack
applications that have not yet done so.

Details will be disclosed no later than 2026-08-28, via the Rails Security
Announcements
forum.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by 0xacb, s3np41k1r1t0 and castilho from Ethiack, and RyotaK from GMO Flatt Security Inc..

References

🚨 Active Storage has possible arbitrary file read and remote code execution in Active Storage variant processing

Impact

In its default configuration, a Rails application that displays image variants may allow an
unauthenticated attacker to read arbitrary files from the server, including the process environment.
That environment typically holds secret_key_base and often credentials for external systems, which
may in turn allow escalation to remote code execution or lateral movement to those systems.

Details

libvips reads and writes file formats through "loaders" and "savers" (or more generally
"operations"), many of which are backed by third-party libraries. It marks some of these operations
as "unfuzzed", meaning they are unsafe for untrusted content, and several handle formats unrelated
to web images. Active Storage did not disable the unfuzzed operations, so an attacker who can upload
a crafted file and cause a variant to be generated from it may be able to invoke one.

We are aware of a mechanism by which an attacker, by uploading a crafted file, is able to cause
disclosure of the contents of arbitrary files accessible on the filesystem of the targeted
application. One specific attack chain has been reported to us (see "Disclosure" below), but we do
not assume it is the only one that exists.

Affected applications

An application is affected if it meets all of these requirements:

  • Uses libvips for Active Storage image processing. This is config.active_storage.variant_processor = :vips,
    which load_defaults 7.0 set and no later default has changed.
  • Allows image uploads from untrusted users.

Generating variants is not a separate requirement.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a fixed version of activestorage.
  • The minimum version of libvips must be upgraded to >= 8.13.
  • Change secret_key_base and change any secrets accessible in the application environment (see "Expire and change secrets" below)

Earlier versions of libvips (< 8.13) cannot disable unfuzzed operations at all, and Active Storage
will raise an exception during boot in such an unsecurable environment.

Expire and change secrets

Upgrading closes the vulnerability but does not undo an exfiltrated secret if that already
occurred. An affected application should treat every secret readable by the application process as
potentially exposed and change it, including:

  • secret_key_base
  • The master key, whether stored in config/master.key or supplied as RAILS_MASTER_KEY, along
    with everything in config/credentials.yml.enc that it decrypts
  • Credentials for the Active Storage service, such as S3, GCS, or Azure keys
  • Database credentials
  • Tokens and keys for any third-party service the application calls

Changing secret_key_base expires active sessions and requires users to log in again. Encrypted
cookies, signed cookies, signed global IDs, and Active Storage URLs are also affected.

Rotation should only be used as an intermediate step if necessary. Do not retain an exposed secret
as a fallback.

Workarounds

If libvips < 8.13 is being used, there are no workarounds available other than removing the
dependency on libvips from the application. Some applications may have ruby-vips declared as a
dependency only for image analysis, and those applications may be able to simply remove ruby-vips
from the Gemfile to remove libvips from the application. Applications that do not use Active Storage
can remove ruby-vips from the Gemfile to avoid the boot-time checks.

If libvips >= 8.13 is present on the system, applications can disable the unfuzzed operations
without upgrading Rails by setting the VIPS_BLOCK_UNTRUSTED environment variable, which libvips
reads while initializing.

Applications also running ruby-vips >= 2.2.1 or later can instead call
Vips.block_untrusted(true) from an initializer.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Versions affected

  • activestorage < 7.2.3.2
  • activestorage >= 8.0, < 8.0.5.1
  • activestorage >= 8.1, < 8.1.3.1

Disclosure

Technical details of the attack chain are intentionally omitted from this advisory. They would add
nothing to an administrator's decision to upgrade, while making it substantially easier to attack
applications that have not yet done so.

Details will be disclosed no later than 2026-08-28, via the Rails Security
Announcements
forum.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by 0xacb, s3np41k1r1t0 and castilho from Ethiack, and RyotaK from GMO Flatt Security Inc..

References

🚨 Active Storage has possible arbitrary file read and remote code execution in Active Storage variant processing

Impact

In its default configuration, a Rails application that displays image variants may allow an
unauthenticated attacker to read arbitrary files from the server, including the process environment.
That environment typically holds secret_key_base and often credentials for external systems, which
may in turn allow escalation to remote code execution or lateral movement to those systems.

Details

libvips reads and writes file formats through "loaders" and "savers" (or more generally
"operations"), many of which are backed by third-party libraries. It marks some of these operations
as "unfuzzed", meaning they are unsafe for untrusted content, and several handle formats unrelated
to web images. Active Storage did not disable the unfuzzed operations, so an attacker who can upload
a crafted file and cause a variant to be generated from it may be able to invoke one.

We are aware of a mechanism by which an attacker, by uploading a crafted file, is able to cause
disclosure of the contents of arbitrary files accessible on the filesystem of the targeted
application. One specific attack chain has been reported to us (see "Disclosure" below), but we do
not assume it is the only one that exists.

Affected applications

An application is affected if it meets all of these requirements:

  • Uses libvips for Active Storage image processing. This is config.active_storage.variant_processor = :vips,
    which load_defaults 7.0 set and no later default has changed.
  • Allows image uploads from untrusted users.

Generating variants is not a separate requirement.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a fixed version of activestorage.
  • The minimum version of libvips must be upgraded to >= 8.13.
  • Change secret_key_base and change any secrets accessible in the application environment (see "Expire and change secrets" below)

Earlier versions of libvips (< 8.13) cannot disable unfuzzed operations at all, and Active Storage
will raise an exception during boot in such an unsecurable environment.

Expire and change secrets

Upgrading closes the vulnerability but does not undo an exfiltrated secret if that already
occurred. An affected application should treat every secret readable by the application process as
potentially exposed and change it, including:

  • secret_key_base
  • The master key, whether stored in config/master.key or supplied as RAILS_MASTER_KEY, along
    with everything in config/credentials.yml.enc that it decrypts
  • Credentials for the Active Storage service, such as S3, GCS, or Azure keys
  • Database credentials
  • Tokens and keys for any third-party service the application calls

Changing secret_key_base expires active sessions and requires users to log in again. Encrypted
cookies, signed cookies, signed global IDs, and Active Storage URLs are also affected.

Rotation should only be used as an intermediate step if necessary. Do not retain an exposed secret
as a fallback.

Workarounds

If libvips < 8.13 is being used, there are no workarounds available other than removing the
dependency on libvips from the application. Some applications may have ruby-vips declared as a
dependency only for image analysis, and those applications may be able to simply remove ruby-vips
from the Gemfile to remove libvips from the application. Applications that do not use Active Storage
can remove ruby-vips from the Gemfile to avoid the boot-time checks.

If libvips >= 8.13 is present on the system, applications can disable the unfuzzed operations
without upgrading Rails by setting the VIPS_BLOCK_UNTRUSTED environment variable, which libvips
reads while initializing.

Applications also running ruby-vips >= 2.2.1 or later can instead call
Vips.block_untrusted(true) from an initializer.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Versions affected

  • activestorage < 7.2.3.2
  • activestorage >= 8.0, < 8.0.5.1
  • activestorage >= 8.1, < 8.1.3.1

Disclosure

Technical details of the attack chain are intentionally omitted from this advisory. They would add
nothing to an administrator's decision to upgrade, while making it substantially easier to attack
applications that have not yet done so.

Details will be disclosed no later than 2026-08-28, via the Rails Security
Announcements
forum.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by 0xacb, s3np41k1r1t0 and castilho from Ethiack, and RyotaK from GMO Flatt Security Inc..

References

🚨 Rails Active Storage has a possible DoS vulnerability in proxy mode via multi-range requests

Impact

Active Storage's proxy controller does not limit the number of byte ranges in an HTTP Range header. A request with thousands of small ranges causes disproportionate CPU usage compared to a normal request for the same file, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher thwin_htet.

🚨 Rails Active Storage has a possible DoS vulnerability in proxy mode via multi-range requests

Impact

Active Storage's proxy controller does not limit the number of byte ranges in an HTTP Range header. A request with thousands of small ranges causes disproportionate CPU usage compared to a normal request for the same file, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher thwin_htet.

🚨 Rails Active Storage has a possible DoS vulnerability in proxy mode via multi-range requests

Impact

Active Storage's proxy controller does not limit the number of byte ranges in an HTTP Range header. A request with thousands of small ranges causes disproportionate CPU usage compared to a normal request for the same file, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher thwin_htet.

🚨 Rails Active Storage has possible Path Traversal in DiskService

Impact

Active Storage's DiskService#path_for does not validate that the resolved filesystem path remains within the storage root directory. If a blob key containing path traversal sequences (e.g. ../) is used, it could allow reading, writing, or deleting arbitrary files on the server. Blob keys are expected to be trusted strings, but some applications could be passing user input as keys and would be affected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher ksw9722.

🚨 Rails Active Storage has possible glob injection in its DiskService

Impact

Active Storage's DiskService#delete_prefixed passes blob keys directly to Dir.glob without escaping glob metacharacters. If a blob key contains attacker-controlled input or custom-generated keys with glob metacharacters, it may be possible to delete unintended files from the storage directory.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

🚨 Rails Active Storage has a possible DoS vulnerability when in proxy mode via Range requests

Impact

When serving files through Active Storage's Blobs::ProxyController, the controller loads the entire requested byte range into memory before sending it. A request with a large or unbounded Range header (e.g. bytes=0-) could cause the server to allocate memory proportional to the file size, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability through memory exhaustion.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone user pirikara

🚨 Rails Active Storage has possible content type bypass via metadata in direct uploads

Impact

Active Storage's DirectUploadsController accepts arbitrary metadata from the client and persists it on the blob. Because internal flags like identified and analyzed are stored in the same metadata hash, a malicious direct-upload client could set these flags.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This was responsible reported by Hackerone researcher pwnie

🚨 Rails Active Storage has a possible DoS vulnerability when in proxy mode via Range requests

Impact

When serving files through Active Storage's Blobs::ProxyController, the controller loads the entire requested byte range into memory before sending it. A request with a large or unbounded Range header (e.g. bytes=0-) could cause the server to allocate memory proportional to the file size, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability through memory exhaustion.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone user pirikara

🚨 Rails Active Storage has possible Path Traversal in DiskService

Impact

Active Storage's DiskService#path_for does not validate that the resolved filesystem path remains within the storage root directory. If a blob key containing path traversal sequences (e.g. ../) is used, it could allow reading, writing, or deleting arbitrary files on the server. Blob keys are expected to be trusted strings, but some applications could be passing user input as keys and would be affected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher ksw9722.

🚨 Rails Active Storage has possible glob injection in its DiskService

Impact

Active Storage's DiskService#delete_prefixed passes blob keys directly to Dir.glob without escaping glob metacharacters. If a blob key contains attacker-controlled input or custom-generated keys with glob metacharacters, it may be possible to delete unintended files from the storage directory.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

🚨 Rails Active Storage has possible content type bypass via metadata in direct uploads

Impact

Active Storage's DirectUploadsController accepts arbitrary metadata from the client and persists it on the blob. Because internal flags like identified and analyzed are stored in the same metadata hash, a malicious direct-upload client could set these flags.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This was responsible reported by Hackerone researcher pwnie

🚨 Rails Active Storage has possible content type bypass via metadata in direct uploads

Impact

Active Storage's DirectUploadsController accepts arbitrary metadata from the client and persists it on the blob. Because internal flags like identified and analyzed are stored in the same metadata hash, a malicious direct-upload client could set these flags.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This was responsible reported by Hackerone researcher pwnie

🚨 Rails Active Storage has a possible DoS vulnerability when in proxy mode via Range requests

Impact

When serving files through Active Storage's Blobs::ProxyController, the controller loads the entire requested byte range into memory before sending it. A request with a large or unbounded Range header (e.g. bytes=0-) could cause the server to allocate memory proportional to the file size, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability through memory exhaustion.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone user pirikara

🚨 Rails Active Storage has possible Path Traversal in DiskService

Impact

Active Storage's DiskService#path_for does not validate that the resolved filesystem path remains within the storage root directory. If a blob key containing path traversal sequences (e.g. ../) is used, it could allow reading, writing, or deleting arbitrary files on the server. Blob keys are expected to be trusted strings, but some applications could be passing user input as keys and would be affected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher ksw9722.

🚨 Rails Active Storage has possible glob injection in its DiskService

Impact

Active Storage's DiskService#delete_prefixed passes blob keys directly to Dir.glob without escaping glob metacharacters. If a blob key contains attacker-controlled input or custom-generated keys with glob metacharacters, it may be possible to delete unintended files from the storage directory.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

🚨 Active Storage allowed transformation methods that were potentially unsafe

Active Storage attempts to prevent the use of potentially unsafe image transformation methods and parameters by default.

The default allowed list contains three methods allowing for the circumvention of the safe defaults which enables potential command injection vulnerabilities in cases where arbitrary user supplied input is accepted as valid transformation methods or parameters.

This has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2025-24293.

Versions Affected: >= 5.2.0
Not affected: < 5.2.0
Fixed Versions: 7.1.5.2, 7.2.2.2, 8.0.2.1

Impact

This vulnerability impacts applications that use Active Storage with the image_processing processing gem in addition to mini_magick as the image processor.

Vulnerable code will look something similar to this:

<%= image_tag blob.variant(params[:t] => params[:v]) %>

Where the transformation method or its arguments are untrusted arbitrary input.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Consuming user supplied input for image transformation methods or their parameters is unsupported behavior and should be considered dangerous.

Strict validation of user supplied methods and parameters should be performed as well as having a strong ImageMagick security policy deployed.

Credits

Thank you lio346 from Unit 515 of OPSWAT for reporting this!

🚨 Active Storage allowed transformation methods that were potentially unsafe

Active Storage attempts to prevent the use of potentially unsafe image transformation methods and parameters by default.

The default allowed list contains three methods allowing for the circumvention of the safe defaults which enables potential command injection vulnerabilities in cases where arbitrary user supplied input is accepted as valid transformation methods or parameters.

This has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2025-24293.

Versions Affected: >= 5.2.0
Not affected: < 5.2.0
Fixed Versions: 7.1.5.2, 7.2.2.2, 8.0.2.1

Impact

This vulnerability impacts applications that use Active Storage with the image_processing processing gem in addition to mini_magick as the image processor.

Vulnerable code will look something similar to this:

<%= image_tag blob.variant(params[:t] => params[:v]) %>

Where the transformation method or its arguments are untrusted arbitrary input.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Consuming user supplied input for image transformation methods or their parameters is unsupported behavior and should be considered dangerous.

Strict validation of user supplied methods and parameters should be performed as well as having a strong ImageMagick security policy deployed.

Credits

Thank you lio346 from Unit 515 of OPSWAT for reporting this!

🚨 Active Storage allowed transformation methods that were potentially unsafe

Active Storage attempts to prevent the use of potentially unsafe image transformation methods and parameters by default.

The default allowed list contains three methods allowing for the circumvention of the safe defaults which enables potential command injection vulnerabilities in cases where arbitrary user supplied input is accepted as valid transformation methods or parameters.

This has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2025-24293.

Versions Affected: >= 5.2.0
Not affected: < 5.2.0
Fixed Versions: 7.1.5.2, 7.2.2.2, 8.0.2.1

Impact

This vulnerability impacts applications that use Active Storage with the image_processing processing gem in addition to mini_magick as the image processor.

Vulnerable code will look something similar to this:

<%= image_tag blob.variant(params[:t] => params[:v]) %>

Where the transformation method or its arguments are untrusted arbitrary input.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Consuming user supplied input for image transformation methods or their parameters is unsupported behavior and should be considered dangerous.

Strict validation of user supplied methods and parameters should be performed as well as having a strong ImageMagick security policy deployed.

Credits

Thank you lio346 from Unit 515 of OPSWAT for reporting this!

🚨 Rails has possible Sensitive Session Information Leak in Active Storage

Possible Sensitive Session Information Leak in Active Storage

There is a possible sensitive session information leak in Active Storage. By
default, Active Storage sends a Set-Cookie header along with the user's
session cookie when serving blobs. It also sets Cache-Control to public.
Certain proxies may cache the Set-Cookie, leading to an information leak.

This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-26144.

Versions Affected: >= 5.2.0, < 7.1.0
Not affected: < 5.2.0, > 7.1.0
Fixed Versions: 7.0.8.1, 6.1.7.7

Impact

A proxy which chooses to caches this request can cause users to share
sessions. This may include a user receiving an attacker's session or vice
versa.

This was patched in 7.1.0 but not previously identified as a security
vulnerability.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the
workarounds immediately.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Upgrade to Rails 7.1.X, or configure caching proxies not to cache the
Set-Cookie headers.

Credits

Thanks to tyage for reporting this!

🚨 Possible code injection vulnerability in Rails / Active Storage

The Active Storage module of Rails starting with version 5.2.0 is possibly vulnerable to code injection. This issue was patched in versions 5.2.6.3, 6.0.4.7, 6.1.4.7, and 7.0.2.3. To work around this issue, applications should implement a strict allow-list on accepted transformation methods or arguments. Additionally, a strict ImageMagick security policy will help mitigate this issue.

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ concurrent-ruby (indirect, 1.3.5 β†’ 1.3.8) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Concurrent Ruby : `AtomicReference#update` livelocks when the stored value is `Float::NAN`

Summary

Concurrent::AtomicReference#update can enter a permanent busy retry loop when the current value is Float::NAN.

The issue is caused by the interaction between:

  • AtomicReference#update, which retries until compare_and_set(old_value, new_value) succeeds.
  • Numeric compare_and_set, which checks old == old_value before attempting the underlying atomic swap.
  • Ruby NaN semantics, where Float::NAN == Float::NAN is always false.

As a result, once an AtomicReference contains Float::NAN, calling #update repeatedly evaluates the caller's block and never returns. In services that store externally derived numeric values in an AtomicReference, this can cause CPU exhaustion or permanent request/job hangs.

Version

Software: concurrent-ruby
Version: 1.3.6
Commit: 7a1b789

Details

AtomicReference#update retries until compare_and_set returns true:

def update
  true until compare_and_set(old_value = get, new_value = yield(old_value))
  new_value
end

For numeric expected values, compare_and_set uses numeric equality before attempting the underlying atomic compare-and-set:

def compare_and_set(old_value, new_value)
  if old_value.kind_of? Numeric
    while true
      old = get

      return false unless old.kind_of? Numeric
      return false unless old == old_value

      result = _compare_and_set(old, new_value)
      return result if result
    end
  else
    _compare_and_set(old_value, new_value)
  end
end

When the stored value is Float::NAN, old_value = get returns NaN. The later comparison old == old_value is false because NaN is not equal to itself. compare_and_set therefore returns false every time. AtomicReference#update treats that as a failed concurrent update and retries forever.

This is reachable through the public Concurrent::AtomicReference API and does not require native extensions or undefined behavior.

PoC

#!/usr/bin/env ruby
# frozen_string_literal: true

require 'concurrent/atomic/atomic_reference'
require 'concurrent/version'

puts "ruby=#{RUBY_DESCRIPTION}"
puts "concurrent_ruby_version=#{Concurrent::VERSION}"
puts "poc=AtomicReference#update livelock when current value is Float::NAN"

ref = Concurrent::AtomicReference.new(Float::NAN)
attempts = 0
finished = false

worker = Thread.new do
  ref.update do |_old_value|
    attempts += 1
    0.0
  end
  finished = true
end

sleep 0.25

puts "nan_update_attempts_after_250ms=#{attempts}"
puts "nan_update_finished=#{finished}"
puts "nan_update_worker_alive=#{worker.alive?}"

if worker.alive? && !finished && attempts > 1000
  puts 'result=REPRODUCED busy retry loop; update did not complete'
else
  puts 'result=NOT_REPRODUCED'
end

worker.kill
worker.join

control = Concurrent::AtomicReference.new(1.0)
control_attempts = 0
control_result = control.update do |old_value|
  control_attempts += 1
  old_value + 1.0
end

puts "control_update_result=#{control_result.inspect}"
puts "control_update_attempts=#{control_attempts}"
puts "control_update_final_value=#{control.value.inspect}"

Log evidence

ruby=ruby 2.6.10p210 (2022-04-12 revision 67958) [universal.arm64e-darwin25]
concurrent_ruby_version=1.3.6
poc=AtomicReference#update livelock when current value is Float::NAN
nan_update_attempts_after_250ms=1926016
nan_update_finished=false
nan_update_worker_alive=true
result=REPRODUCED busy retry loop; update did not complete
control_update_result=2.0
control_update_attempts=1
control_update_final_value=2.0

Impact

This is an application-level denial of service issue. If an application stores externally derived numeric data in a Concurrent::AtomicReference, an attacker or faulty upstream data source may be able to cause the stored value to become Float::NAN. Any later call to AtomicReference#update on that reference will spin indefinitely, repeatedly executing the update block and consuming CPU.

Credit

Pranjali Thakur - depthfirst (depthfirst.com)

🚨 Concurrent Ruby: `ReentrantReadWriteLock` read-count overflow grants a write lock without exclusivity

Summary

Concurrent::ReentrantReadWriteLock can incorrectly grant a write lock after one thread acquires the read lock 32,768 times.

The lock stores a thread's local read and write hold counts in one integer. The low 15 bits are used for the read hold count, and bit 15 is used as WRITE_LOCK_HELD. After 32,768 reentrant read acquisitions, the local read count crosses into the write-lock bit. try_write_lock then treats the thread as already holding a write lock and returns true without setting the global RUNNING_WRITER bit.

This breaks the core mutual-exclusion guarantee: the caller is told it has a write lock, but other threads can still hold or acquire read locks at the same time.

Version

Software: concurrent-ruby
Version: 1.3.6
Commit: 7a1b789

Details

The implementation uses a shared counter to track global readers/writers and a per-thread local counter to support reentrancy:

READER_BITS    = 15
WRITER_BITS    = 14

WAITING_WRITER = 1 << READER_BITS
RUNNING_WRITER = 1 << (READER_BITS + WRITER_BITS)
MAX_READERS    = WAITING_WRITER - 1
MAX_WRITERS    = RUNNING_WRITER - MAX_READERS - 1

WRITE_LOCK_HELD = 1 << READER_BITS
READ_LOCK_MASK  = WRITE_LOCK_HELD - 1
WRITE_LOCK_MASK = MAX_WRITERS

When a thread already holds a lock, acquire_read_lock increments @HeldCount:

if (held = @HeldCount.value) > 0
  if held & READ_LOCK_MASK == 0
    @Counter.update { |c| c + 1 }
  end
  @HeldCount.value = held + 1
  return true
end

After 32,768 read acquisitions, the per-thread held count becomes 32768, which is equal to WRITE_LOCK_HELD. Then try_write_lock returns success through its "already have a write lock" branch:

def try_write_lock
  if (held = @HeldCount.value) >= WRITE_LOCK_HELD
    @HeldCount.value = held + WRITE_LOCK_HELD
    return true
  else
    # normal global writer acquisition path
  end
end

This branch does not set the global RUNNING_WRITER bit. Other threads therefore do not observe an active writer and can continue holding or acquiring read locks while the caller believes it owns the write lock.

PoC

#!/usr/bin/env ruby
# frozen_string_literal: true

require 'concurrent/atomic/reentrant_read_write_lock'
require 'concurrent/version'
require 'thread'

def wait_for_queue(queue, timeout_seconds)
  deadline = Process.clock_gettime(Process::CLOCK_MONOTONIC) + timeout_seconds
  loop do
    return queue.pop(true)
  rescue ThreadError
    return nil if Process.clock_gettime(Process::CLOCK_MONOTONIC) >= deadline

    sleep 0.001
  end
end

puts "ruby=#{RUBY_DESCRIPTION}"
puts "concurrent_ruby_version=#{Concurrent::VERSION}"
puts "poc=ReentrantReadWriteLock read-depth overflow grants write lock without exclusivity"

lock = Concurrent::ReentrantReadWriteLock.new
other_reader_ready = Queue.new
other_reader_stop = Queue.new

other_reader = Thread.new do
  lock.acquire_read_lock
  other_reader_ready << :held
  other_reader_stop.pop
end

wait_for_queue(other_reader_ready, 1)
puts "other_thread_holds_read_lock=true"

depth = Concurrent::ReentrantReadWriteLock::WRITE_LOCK_HELD
depth.times { lock.acquire_read_lock }

held_count = lock.instance_eval { @HeldCount.value }
counter_before = lock.instance_eval { @Counter.value }

puts "main_thread_read_acquisitions=#{depth}"
puts "main_thread_held_count=#{held_count}"
puts "counter_before_try_write=#{counter_before}"
puts "running_writer_bit_before=#{(counter_before & Concurrent::ReentrantReadWriteLock::RUNNING_WRITER) != 0}"

write_granted = lock.try_write_lock
counter_after = lock.instance_eval { @Counter.value }

puts "try_write_lock_returned=#{write_granted}"
puts "counter_after_try_write=#{counter_after}"
puts "running_writer_bit_after=#{(counter_after & Concurrent::ReentrantReadWriteLock::RUNNING_WRITER) != 0}"

third_reader_ready = Queue.new
third_reader = Thread.new do
  lock.acquire_read_lock
  third_reader_ready << :acquired
end

third_reader_acquired = wait_for_queue(third_reader_ready, 0.25) == :acquired
puts "new_reader_acquired_while_write_claimed=#{third_reader_acquired}"

if write_granted && third_reader_acquired && (counter_after & Concurrent::ReentrantReadWriteLock::RUNNING_WRITER).zero?
  puts 'result=REPRODUCED write lock granted without setting global writer state'
else
  puts 'result=NOT_REPRODUCED'
end

third_reader.kill
other_reader_stop << :stop
other_reader.kill

Log evidence

ruby=ruby 2.6.10p210 (2022-04-12 revision 67958) [universal.arm64e-darwin25]
concurrent_ruby_version=1.3.6
poc=ReentrantReadWriteLock read-depth overflow grants write lock without exclusivity
other_thread_holds_read_lock=true
main_thread_read_acquisitions=32768
main_thread_held_count=32768
counter_before_try_write=2
running_writer_bit_before=false
try_write_lock_returned=true
counter_after_try_write=2
running_writer_bit_after=false
new_reader_acquired_while_write_claimed=true
result=REPRODUCED write lock granted without setting global writer state

Impact

This breaks the write-lock exclusivity guarantee. After the overflow, a thread can be told it has acquired the write lock while other threads can still hold or acquire read locks, allowing races and inconsistent reads of protected mutable state.

Credit

Pranjali Thakur - depthfirst (depthfirst.com)

🚨 Concurrent Ruby: ReadWriteLock allows wrong-thread write release and stray read-release counter corruption

Summary

Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_write_lock does not verify that the calling thread acquired the write lock. Any thread with access to the lock object can release an active write lock held by another thread. A second writer can then enter its critical section while the first writer is still running.

Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_read_lock also decrements the shared counter even when no read lock is held. Calling it on a fresh lock changes the counter from 0 to -1, after which normal read acquisition raises Concurrent::ResourceLimitError.

This is a synchronization correctness issue in the public Concurrent::ReadWriteLock API. It should not be framed as an authorization bypass; the lock is an in-process concurrency primitive, not an access-control boundary.

Version

Software: concurrent-ruby
Version: 1.3.6
Commit: 7a1b789

Details

release_write_lock checks only whether the global counter indicates that a writer is running. It does not track or verify ownership:

def release_write_lock
  return true unless running_writer?
  c = @Counter.update { |counter| counter - RUNNING_WRITER }
  @ReadLock.broadcast
  @WriteLock.signal if waiting_writers(c) > 0
  true
end

Because ownership is not checked, a different thread can clear the RUNNING_WRITER bit while the original writer is still inside its critical section. Another writer can then acquire the write lock and run concurrently with the first writer.

release_read_lock unconditionally decrements the shared counter:

def release_read_lock
  while true
    c = @Counter.value
    if @Counter.compare_and_set(c, c-1)
      if waiting_writer?(c) && running_readers(c) == 1
        @WriteLock.signal
      end
      break
    end
  end
  true
end

On a fresh lock, this changes the counter from 0 to -1. A later acquire_read_lock raises Concurrent::ResourceLimitError because the maximum-reader check masks the negative counter as saturated.

Reproduce

From the root of a concurrent-ruby checkout, run:

ruby -Ilib/concurrent-ruby - <<'RUBY'
require 'concurrent/atomic/read_write_lock'
require 'concurrent/version'
require 'thread'

puts "ruby=#{RUBY_DESCRIPTION}"
puts "concurrent_ruby_version=#{Concurrent::VERSION}"
puts "poc=ReadWriteLock release methods corrupt or bypass lock state"

lock = Concurrent::ReadWriteLock.new
events = Queue.new
writer1_inside = false

writer1 = Thread.new do
  lock.acquire_write_lock
  writer1_inside = true
  events << :writer1_acquired
  sleep 0.5
  writer1_inside = false
  lock.release_write_lock
  events << :writer1_finished
end

events.pop
puts 'writer1_acquired=true'

intruder_result = nil
intruder = Thread.new do
  intruder_result = lock.release_write_lock
end
intruder.join

puts "wrong_thread_release_write_lock_returned=#{intruder_result}"

writer2_entered_while_writer1_inside = nil
writer2 = Thread.new do
  lock.acquire_write_lock
  writer2_entered_while_writer1_inside = writer1_inside
  lock.release_write_lock
end

writer2.join(0.25)

puts "writer2_acquired_while_writer1_inside=#{writer2_entered_while_writer1_inside}"

writer1.join

lock2 = Concurrent::ReadWriteLock.new
stray_read_release_result = lock2.release_read_lock
counter_after_stray_read_release = lock2.instance_eval { @Counter.value }
read_after_stray_release = begin
  lock2.acquire_read_lock
  'acquired'
rescue => error
  "#{error.class}: #{error.message}"
end

puts "stray_release_read_lock_returned=#{stray_read_release_result}"
puts "counter_after_stray_read_release=#{counter_after_stray_read_release}"
puts "acquire_read_after_stray_release=#{read_after_stray_release}"

if intruder_result && writer2_entered_while_writer1_inside && counter_after_stray_read_release == -1
  puts 'result=REPRODUCED wrong-thread write release and stray read-release corruption'
else
  puts 'result=NOT_REPRODUCED'
end

Expected result:

  • A second thread successfully calls release_write_lock while the first writer still holds the lock.
  • A second writer enters while the first writer is still inside the write critical section.
  • Calling release_read_lock on a fresh lock changes the counter to -1.
  • A subsequent read acquisition fails with Concurrent::ResourceLimitError.

Log evidence

Local reproduction output:

ruby=ruby 2.6.10p210 (2022-04-12 revision 67958) [universal.arm64e-darwin25]
concurrent_ruby_version=1.3.6
poc=ReadWriteLock release methods corrupt or bypass lock state
writer1_acquired=true
wrong_thread_release_write_lock_returned=true
writer2_acquired_while_writer1_inside=true
stray_release_read_lock_returned=true
counter_after_stray_read_release=-1
acquire_read_after_stray_release=Concurrent::ResourceLimitError: Too many reader threads
result=REPRODUCED wrong-thread write release and stray read-release corruption

Impact

This can break the write-lock mutual exclusion guarantee and can also leave a lock unusable after a stray read release.
The impact is local to applications that expose or misuse the manual acquire_* / release_* APIs. If the lock protects integrity-sensitive mutable state, wrong-thread write release can allow concurrent writers and data races. The stray read-release path can cause denial of service by corrupting the lock counter.

Credit

Pranjali Thakur - depthfirst (depthfirst.com)

Release Notes

1.3.8

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v1.3.7...v1.3.8

1.3.7

There are 3 security fixes in this release, so updating is recommended.
These security vulnerabilities are not very likely to be hit in practice and have a corresponding Low severity score.

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v1.3.6...v1.3.7

1.3.6

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v1.3.5...v1.3.6

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 40 commits:

↗️ crass (indirect, 1.0.6 β†’ 1.0.7) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Release Notes

1.0.7

Security

  • High: Fixed a denial of service vulnerability in which a large numeric exponent could consume disproportionate CPU and memory before the value was clamped. Exponents are now bounded before 10**exponent is computed. (GHSA-6wmf-3r64-vcwv)

  • Moderate: Fixed a scenario in which deeply nested simple blocks or functions could exhaust the Ruby stack and raise SystemStackError, or could result in excessive memory usage. Parser nesting is now limited to a configurable maximum depth via a new option (:maximum_depth, with a conservative default of 25). Constructs nested more deeply are discarded as an :error node with the value "maximum-depth-exceeded". (GHSA-6jxj-px6v-747w)

  • Moderate: Fixed a scenario in which a long run of adjacent comments could exhaust the Ruby stack and raise SystemStackError. Discarded comments are now skipped iteratively rather than recursively. (GHSA-wwpr-jff3-395c)

  • Moderate: Fixed a denial of service vulnerability in which inputs containing many non-ASCII characters could cause excessive CPU usage due to inefficient handling of multi-byte characters during tokenization. (GHSA-8vfg-2r28-hvhj)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 26 commits:

↗️ date (indirect, 3.4.1 β†’ 3.5.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Release Notes

3.5.1

What's Changed

  • Remove archaic conditions by @nobu in #144
  • [DOC] Remove the name from same file references by @nobu in #147
  • Call rb_gc_register_mark_object after object allocation by @peterzhu2118 in #149

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v3.5.0...v3.5.1

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ globalid (indirect, 1.2.1 β†’ 1.4.0) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Release Notes

1.4.0

What's Changed

  • Add GlobalID::Locator.fetch with distinct not-found and unavailable errors by @rosa in #206
  • Change the underlying URI parser (from RFC2396 to RFC3986) by @Drowze in #202
  • Don't try to constantize GID's class too soon by @paulRbr in #204
  • Allow custom locators to override model class by @xijo in #203

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v1.3.0...v1.4.0

1.3.0

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v1.2.1...v1.3.0

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 51 commits:

↗️ i18n (indirect, 1.14.7 β†’ 1.15.2) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Release Notes

1.15.2

What's Changed

Full Changelog: v1.15.1...v1.15.2

1.15.1

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v1.15.0...v1.15.1

1.15.0

What's Changed

  • Make lazy loading of I18n translations thread safe ( part 2 ) by @chaadow in #729
  • Add support to not replace non-ASCII chars not in map by @sobrinho in #720
  • Add transliteration for O with ogonek by @radar in #733
  • CI: exclude Ruby 3.2 from rails-main matrix by @radar in #734
  • Fiber-aware I18n config storage by @lee266 in #731

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v1.14.8...v1.15.0

1.14.8

Full Changelog: v1.14.7...v1.14.8

What's Changed

  • Remove unused cgi require for Ruby 3.5 compatibility by @Earlopain in #713
  • Explicitly require pathname by @voxik in #708
  • CI: Add Ruby 3.4 to CI Matrix by @taketo1113 in #722
  • Fix: I18n.locale reset in Fiber context by using Thread#thread_variable by @lee266 in #724
  • CI: Use actions/checkout@v5 by @olleolleolle in #721
  • Fix compatibility with --enable-frozen-string-literal by @byroot in #726

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v1.14.7...v1.14.8

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 45 commits:

↗️ loofah (indirect, 2.24.1 β†’ 2.25.2) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Loofah `allowed_uri?` does not detect `javascript:` URIs split by named whitespace character references

Summary

Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? does not correctly reject javascript: URIs when the scheme is split or prefixed by the HTML5 named character references &Tab; (tab) or &NewLine; (line feed).

This is a bypass of the fix for GHSA-46fp-8f5p-pf2m, which handled the equivalent numeric character references (&#9;, &#10;, &#13;) but did not cover the named forms.

Details

allowed_uri? decodes HTML entities with CGI.unescapeHTML, which handles numeric character references but not HTML5 named character references. Payloads like java&Tab;script:alert(1) are therefore left intact, so the method does not recognize the javascript: scheme and returns true. A browser, however, decodes &Tab; and &NewLine; to tab and line feed and strips them from the URL during parsing, producing javascript:alert(1).

&Tab; and &NewLine; are the only relevant named character references: across the HTML5 named-character table, they are the only two that decode to characters the WHATWG URL parser strips from a URL (U+0009 and U+000A; there is no named reference for U+000D). &nbsp; / &NonBreakingSpace; decode to U+00A0, which browsers do not strip, so they aren't usable for this bypass.

Note that Loofah's default sanitize() path is not affected, because Nokogiri decodes or entity-escapes HTML entities during parsing before Loofah evaluates the URI protocol. This issue only affects callers of the public allowed_uri? string-level helper that pass it HTML-encoded strings.

Impact

Callers that validate a user-controlled URL with Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? and then render the approved value into an href or other browser-interpreted URI attribute may be vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS). This includes applications that call allowed_uri? directly, as well as higher-level features built on top of it, such as Action Text 8.2's markdown link validation.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Loofah >= 2.25.2.

Credit

Responsibly reported by GitHub user @connorshea.

🚨 Loofah: SVG `href` attribute bypasses local-reference restriction

Summary

Loofah's HTML5 sanitizer restricted only the xlink:href attribute on certain SVG elements to local, same-document references. Browsers also accept a plain href attribute as an alternative to the deprecated xlink:href per the SVG 2 spec, but Loofah did not apply the same restriction to it, allowing those elements to reference arbitrary external documents.

Impact

SVG <use> can load and render external SVG content by reference. If the referenced external SVG is same-origin and contains scripts or other dangerous content, it could execute in the context of the sanitized document. <feImage> can load external images, which can be used for tracking. Modern browsers restrict cross-origin <use> fetches, which limits but does not eliminate the risk.

Applications that sanitize user-supplied SVG (directly, or as part of HTML) with Loofah's default allowlist are affected.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Loofah >= 2.25.2.

Credit

Found by the maintainer, Mike Dalessio, during a security audit.

🚨 Loofah `allowed_uri?` does not detect `javascript:` URIs split by numeric character references without semicolons

Summary

Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? does not correctly reject javascript: or vbscript: URIs when the scheme is split by a numeric character reference that has no trailing semicolon. A browser decodes such references and resolves the URL to an executable javascript: scheme, while allowed_uri? reports it safe.

This is a bypass of the fix for GHSA-46fp-8f5p-pf2m, which handled numeric character references with a trailing ; (&#9;, &#10;, &#13;) but did not cover the forms without semicolons.

Details

allowed_uri? decodes HTML entities with CGI.unescapeHTML, which decodes numeric character references only when they carry a trailing ;. A reference without a semicolon such as &#58 (colon) or &#9 (tab) is left literal, so the scheme-detection check finds no scheme, and the method falls through to its scheme-less path and returns true.

A browser, however, decodes numeric character references even without a trailing semicolon. An encoded colon such as &#58 becomes the : scheme separator, so javascript&#58alert(1) resolves to javascript:alert(1). Encoded whitespace such as &#9 (tab) is decoded and then stripped from the URL, rejoining the surrounding text, so java&#9script:alert(1) also resolves to javascript:alert(1). In both cases the URL executes while allowed_uri? approved it as safe.

Note that Loofah's default sanitize() path is not affected, because Nokogiri decodes or entity-escapes HTML entities during parsing before Loofah evaluates the URI protocol. This issue only affects callers of the public allowed_uri? string-level helper that pass it HTML-encoded strings.

Impact

Callers that validate a user-controlled URL with Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? and then render the approved value into an href or other browser-interpreted URI attribute may be vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS). This includes applications that call allowed_uri? directly, as well as higher-level features built on top of it, such as Action Text 8.2's markdown link validation.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Loofah >= 2.25.2.

Credit

Responsibly reported by GitHub user @MoonFuji.

🚨 Loofah has improper detection of disallowed URIs via `allowed_uri?`

Summary

Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? does not correctly reject javascript: URIs when the scheme is split by HTML entity-encoded control characters such as &#13; (carriage return), &#10; (line feed), or &#9; (tab).

Details

The allowed_uri? method strips literal control characters before decoding HTML entities. Payloads like java&#13;script:alert(1) survive the control character strip, then &#13; is decoded to a carriage return, producing java\rscript:alert(1).

Note that the Loofah sanitizer's default sanitize() path is not affected because Nokogiri decodes HTML entities during parsing before Loofah evaluates the URI protocol. This issue only affects direct callers of the allowed_uri? string-level helper when passing HTML-encoded strings.

Impact

Applications that call Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? to validate user-controlled URLs and then render approved URLs into href or other browser-interpreted URI attributes may be vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS).

This only affects Loofah 2.25.0.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Loofah >= 2.25.1.

Credit

Responsibly reported by HackOne user @smlee.

🚨 Improper detection of disallowed URIs by Loofah `allowed_uri?`

Summary

Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? does not correctly reject javascript: URIs when the scheme is split by HTML entity-encoded control characters such as &#13; (carriage return), &#10; (line feed), or &#9; (tab).

Details

The allowed_uri? method strips literal control characters before decoding HTML entities. Payloads like java&#13;script:alert(1) survive the control character strip, then &#13; is decoded to a carriage return, producing java\rscript:alert(1).

Note that the Loofah sanitizer's default sanitize() path is not affected because Nokogiri decodes HTML entities during parsing before Loofah evaluates the URI protocol. This issue only affects direct callers of the allowed_uri? string-level helper when passing HTML-encoded strings.

Impact

Applications that call Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? to validate user-controlled URLs and then render approved URLs into href or other browser-interpreted URI attributes may be vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS).

This only affects Loofah 2.25.0.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Loofah >= 2.25.1.

Credit

Responsibly reported by HackOne user @smlee.

Release Notes

2.25.2

2.25.2 / 2026-07-15

Security

  • Ensure Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? recognizes numeric character references without semicolons (e.g. javascript&#58alert(1)), which browsers decode and execute, and rejects schemes split by them. See GHSA-5qhf-9phg-95m2. @flavorjones
  • Ensure Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? recognizes the named character references &Tab; and &NewLine;, which CGI.unescapeHTML does not decode and browsers strip from URIs, and rejects schemes split by them (e.g. java&Tab;script:alert(1)). See GHSA-8whx-365g-h9vv. @flavorjones
  • Ensure that both href and xlink:href attributes on SVG elements like use are restricted to local (same-document) references. Previously only xlink:href was restricted, allowing the SVG 2 href attribute to reference external documents. See GHSA-9wjq-cp2p-hrgf. @flavorjones

Improved

  • Harden data: URI mediatype parsing in Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri?. The mediatype is now parsed following the WHATWG data: URL spec and RFC 2397 instead of simply being split on a colon. A data: URI with an omitted or malformed mediatype is now treated as text/plain and allowed, and one without the required comma is now rejected. #305 @flavorjones
  • Remove feed from the default set of allowed protocols. The feed URI scheme was never accepted as a standard protocol, and no major browser supports it. Removing it reduces the attack surface particularly for non-browser contexts. #304 @flavorjones
  • Remove a vestigial &#x70 alternative from Loofah::HTML5::SafeList::PROTOCOL_SEPARATOR. This appears to be an ancient typo dating back to pre-extraction Rails circa 2007. #305 @flavorjones

2.25.1

2.25.1 / 2026-03-17

2.25.0

2.25.0 / 2025-12-15

  • Extract Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? which operates on a string. Previously this logic was coupled to the parsed tree in .scrub_uri_attribute. #300 @flavorjones
  • Tightened up how entities and control characters are handled when detecting allowed URIs. #301 @flavorjones

Full Changelog: v2.24.1...v2.25.0

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 26 commits:

↗️ mail (indirect, 2.8.1 β†’ 2.9.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Release Notes

2.9.1

What's Changed

  • Add Ruby 3.4 to CI matrix in GitHub Actions workflow by @ydah in #1653

  • Improve decoding of Q- and B-encoded strings by @radar in #1664

  • Bump to 2.9.1 by @radar in #1665

  • @ydah made their first contribution in #1653

Full Changelog: 2.9.0...2.9.1

2.9.0

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: 2.8.1...2.9.0

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ marcel (indirect, 1.0.4 β†’ 1.2.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Release Notes

1.2.1

  • Revert BMP images type to just image/bmp instead of image/bmp;format=compressed.
    The later is more precise, but cause backward compatibility issues with Active Storage.

Full Changelog: v1.2.0...v1.2.1

1.2.0

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v1.1.1...v1.2.0

1.1.1

What's Changed

  • Fix Ruby 3.4 frozen string literal warnings with StringIO by @andynu in #140

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v1.1.0...v1.1.1

1.1.0

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v1.0.4...v1.1.0

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 66 commits:

↗️ net-imap (indirect, 0.5.9 β†’ 0.6.6) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Net::IMAP: Command Injection via non-synchronizing literal in "raw" argument

Several Net::IMAP commands accept a "raw data" argument that is sent verbatim after validation to prevent command injection. However, if a server does not support non-synchronizing literals, it may still be possible to inject arbitrary IMAP commands inside non-synchronizing literals.

Details

Raw data arguments support embedded literal values, both synchronizing and non-synchronizing. Non-synchronizing literals can only be safely sent when the server advertises any of the LITERAL+, LITERAL-, or IMAP4rev2 capabilities. But raw data arguments do not verify server support for non-synchronizing literals prior to sending.

Servers without support for non-synchronizing literals could handle them in several different ways: If a server sees a "}\r\n" byte sequence but can't parse the literal bytesize, it may cautiously decide to close the connection, blocking any command injection attacks. However, a server without support for non-synchronizing literals may instead interpret the "+}\r\n" as the end of a malformed command line and respond with a tagged BAD. In that case, the contents of the literal will be interpreted as one or more new pipelined commands, allowing a CRLF command injection attack to succeed.

This affects the following commands' string arguments:

  • criteria for #search and #uid_search
  • search_keys for #sort, #thread, #uid_sort, and #uid_thread
  • attr for #fetch and #uid_fetch

Prior to net-imap v0.6.4, v0.5.14, and v0.4.24, raw data arguments were not validated in any way, so they were also vulnerable to this attack. See CVE-2026-42257 (GHSA-hm49-wcqc-g2xg).

Impact

Fortunately, LITERAL- is supported by most modern IMAP servers. Even without support for non-synchronizing literals, cautious servers may handle invalid literal bytesize by closing the connection . However, servers which handle a non-synchronizing literal just like any other malformed command will enable this vulnerability.

If a developer passes an unvalidated user-controlled input for one of these method arguments, an attacker can append CRLF sequence followed by a new IMAP command (like DELETE mailbox). Although this does not directly enable data exfiltration, it could be combined with other attack vectors or knowledge of the target system's attributes, e.g.: shared mail folders or the application's installed response handlers.

Mitigation

Update to a version of net-imap which validates server support for non-synchronizing literals before sending them.

If upgrading net-imap is not possible:

  • Explicitly validate user-controlled inputs to prevent embedded non-synchronizing literals unless the server supports them.
  • For a simpler, more cautious approach: all embedded literals can be unconditionally prohibited, by checking that string inputs do not contain any CR or LF bytes.
  • Verify that the server advertises any of the LITERAL+, LITERAL-, or IMAP4rev2 capabilities before using untrusted string inputs for the affected "raw data" arguments.

🚨 Net::IMAP: Denial of Service via incomplete raw argument validation

Summary

Several Net::IMAP commands accept a raw string argument which is only validated to prevent CRLF injection and then sent verbatim. If this string is derived from user-controlled input, an attacker can force the next command to be absorbed as a continuation of the first command. This will cause the first command to eventually fail, but also prevents it from returning until another command is sent (from another thread). That other command will not return until the connection is closed.

Details

Net::IMAP::RawData was hardened in v0.6.4, v0.5.14, and v0.4.24 to reject string arguments that would smuggle an invalid literal-continuation marker onto the wire (CVE-2026-42257, GHSA-hm49-wcqc-g2xg). But the trailing-marker check uses an incorrect regex which does not match {0} or {0+}, so an attacker-controlled seach criteria or fetch attr string ending in {0} or {0+} passes validation and is sent verbatim. Since these arguments are sent as the last argument in the command, they will be followed by CRLF. Although the CRLF was intended to end the command, the server will interpret it as part of a literal prefix. This consumes the next command the client puts on the socket as additional arguments to the current command.

This affects the following command's arguments:

  • criteria for #search and #uid_search
  • search_keys for #sort, #thread, #uid_sort, and #uid_thread
  • attr for #fetch and #uid_fetch

The command which contained the attacker's raw data will not be able to complete until the next command is issued. If commands are only sent from single thread, the first command will hang until the connection times out (most likely by the server closing the connection).

If a second command is sent (from another thread), this would allow the server to respond to the first command. This combined command will be invalid:

  • The {0}\r\n literal prohibits other arguments (such as a quoted string) from spanning both commands
  • It will be sent without the space delimiter which is required between arguments.
  • The second command's tag will not be a valid argument to any of the vulnerable commands.

So the server should respond to the first command with a BAD response, which will raise a BadResponseError.

But, since the server never saw a second command, the second command will never receive a tagged response and the thread that sent it will hang until the connection is closed.

Impact

This will result in unexpected crashes and timeouts, which could be used to create a simple denial of service attack. This attack will present very similarly to common network issues or server issues which also result in commands hanging or unexpectedly raising exceptions. By itself, this does not allow command injection. But the confusion caused by these errors could lead to other downstream issues, especially in a multi-threaded environment.

Mitigation

Update to a patched version of net-imap which validates that RawData arguments may not end with literal continuation markers.
If net-imap cannot be upgraded:

  • Validate that user input to the affected command arguments does not end with "}".
  • Use of Timeout or other standard strategies for slow connections and misbehaving servers will also mitigate the effects of this.

Extra caution is required when issuing commands from multiple threads. While net-imap does have rudimentary support for issuing commands from multiple threads, the user is responsible for synchronizing that commands are issued in a logically coherent order, and for ensuring that commands are only pipelined when it is safe to do so. Practically, this means that many commands cannot be safely pipelined together, and user code will often need to wait for state changing commands to successfully complete before issuing commands that rely on that state change.

🚨 Net::IMAP: Command Injection via ID command argument

Summary

Two Net::IMAP commands, #id and #enable, do not validate their arguments. Arguments to either command could be used by an attacker to inject arbitrary IMAP commands.

Please note that passing untrusted inputs to these commands is usually inappropriate and expected to be uncommon.

Details

When Net::IMAP#id is called with a hash argument, although the ID field value strings are correctly quoted (escaping quoted specials), they were not validated to prohibit CRLF sequences.

While Net::IMAP#enable does process its arguments for aliases, it does not validate them as valid atoms (or as a list of valid atoms). The #to_s value is sent verbatim.

Impact

This is expected to impact very few users: use of untrusted user input for either command is expected to be very uncommon.

The documentation for #enable explicitly warns that using any arguments that are not in the explicitly supported list may result in undocumented behavior. Using arbitrary untrusted user input for #enable will always be inappropriate.

Although client ID field values will most commonly be static and hardcoded, dynamic input sources may be used. For example, client ID fields may be set by configuration or version numbers. Using untrusted user inputs for client ID fields is expected to be uncommon. But any untrusted inputs to client ID can trivially exploit this vulnerability.

Untrusted inputs to either command may include a CRLF sequence followed by a new IMAP command (like DELETE mailbox). Although this does not directly enable data exfiltration, it could be combined with other attack vectors or knowledge of the target system's attributes, e.g.: shared mail folders or the application's installed response handlers.

Mitigation

Update to a version of net-imap which validates #id and #enable arguments.

Untrusted inputs should never be used for #enable arguments.

If net-imap cannot be upgraded:

  • do not use untrusted inputs for client ID field values
  • or add validation that client ID field values must not contain any CR or LF bytes.

🚨 Net::IMAP: Command Injection via non-synchronizing literal in "raw" argument

Several Net::IMAP commands accept a "raw data" argument that is sent verbatim after validation to prevent command injection. However, if a server does not support non-synchronizing literals, it may still be possible to inject arbitrary IMAP commands inside non-synchronizing literals.

Details

Raw data arguments support embedded literal values, both synchronizing and non-synchronizing. Non-synchronizing literals can only be safely sent when the server advertises any of the LITERAL+, LITERAL-, or IMAP4rev2 capabilities. But raw data arguments do not verify server support for non-synchronizing literals prior to sending.

Servers without support for non-synchronizing literals could handle them in several different ways: If a server sees a "}\r\n" byte sequence but can't parse the literal bytesize, it may cautiously decide to close the connection, blocking any command injection attacks. However, a server without support for non-synchronizing literals may instead interpret the "+}\r\n" as the end of a malformed command line and respond with a tagged BAD. In that case, the contents of the literal will be interpreted as one or more new pipelined commands, allowing a CRLF command injection attack to succeed.

This affects the following commands' string arguments:

  • criteria for #search and #uid_search
  • search_keys for #sort, #thread, #uid_sort, and #uid_thread
  • attr for #fetch and #uid_fetch

Prior to net-imap v0.6.4, v0.5.14, and v0.4.24, raw data arguments were not validated in any way, so they were also vulnerable to this attack. See CVE-2026-42257 (GHSA-hm49-wcqc-g2xg).

Impact

Fortunately, LITERAL- is supported by most modern IMAP servers. Even without support for non-synchronizing literals, cautious servers may handle invalid literal bytesize by closing the connection . However, servers which handle a non-synchronizing literal just like any other malformed command will enable this vulnerability.

If a developer passes an unvalidated user-controlled input for one of these method arguments, an attacker can append CRLF sequence followed by a new IMAP command (like DELETE mailbox). Although this does not directly enable data exfiltration, it could be combined with other attack vectors or knowledge of the target system's attributes, e.g.: shared mail folders or the application's installed response handlers.

Mitigation

Update to a version of net-imap which validates server support for non-synchronizing literals before sending them.

If upgrading net-imap is not possible:

  • Explicitly validate user-controlled inputs to prevent embedded non-synchronizing literals unless the server supports them.
  • For a simpler, more cautious approach: all embedded literals can be unconditionally prohibited, by checking that string inputs do not contain any CR or LF bytes.
  • Verify that the server advertises any of the LITERAL+, LITERAL-, or IMAP4rev2 capabilities before using untrusted string inputs for the affected "raw data" arguments.

🚨 Net::IMAP: Denial of Service via incomplete raw argument validation

Summary

Several Net::IMAP commands accept a raw string argument which is only validated to prevent CRLF injection and then sent verbatim. If this string is derived from user-controlled input, an attacker can force the next command to be absorbed as a continuation of the first command. This will cause the first command to eventually fail, but also prevents it from returning until another command is sent (from another thread). That other command will not return until the connection is closed.

Details

Net::IMAP::RawData was hardened in v0.6.4, v0.5.14, and v0.4.24 to reject string arguments that would smuggle an invalid literal-continuation marker onto the wire (CVE-2026-42257, GHSA-hm49-wcqc-g2xg). But the trailing-marker check uses an incorrect regex which does not match {0} or {0+}, so an attacker-controlled seach criteria or fetch attr string ending in {0} or {0+} passes validation and is sent verbatim. Since these arguments are sent as the last argument in the command, they will be followed by CRLF. Although the CRLF was intended to end the command, the server will interpret it as part of a literal prefix. This consumes the next command the client puts on the socket as additional arguments to the current command.

This affects the following command's arguments:

  • criteria for #search and #uid_search
  • search_keys for #sort, #thread, #uid_sort, and #uid_thread
  • attr for #fetch and #uid_fetch

The command which contained the attacker's raw data will not be able to complete until the next command is issued. If commands are only sent from single thread, the first command will hang until the connection times out (most likely by the server closing the connection).

If a second command is sent (from another thread), this would allow the server to respond to the first command. This combined command will be invalid:

  • The {0}\r\n literal prohibits other arguments (such as a quoted string) from spanning both commands
  • It will be sent without the space delimiter which is required between arguments.
  • The second command's tag will not be a valid argument to any of the vulnerable commands.

So the server should respond to the first command with a BAD response, which will raise a BadResponseError.

But, since the server never saw a second command, the second command will never receive a tagged response and the thread that sent it will hang until the connection is closed.

Impact

This will result in unexpected crashes and timeouts, which could be used to create a simple denial of service attack. This attack will present very similarly to common network issues or server issues which also result in commands hanging or unexpectedly raising exceptions. By itself, this does not allow command injection. But the confusion caused by these errors could lead to other downstream issues, especially in a multi-threaded environment.

Mitigation

Update to a patched version of net-imap which validates that RawData arguments may not end with literal continuation markers.
If net-imap cannot be upgraded:

  • Validate that user input to the affected command arguments does not end with "}".
  • Use of Timeout or other standard strategies for slow connections and misbehaving servers will also mitigate the effects of this.

Extra caution is required when issuing commands from multiple threads. While net-imap does have rudimentary support for issuing commands from multiple threads, the user is responsible for synchronizing that commands are issued in a logically coherent order, and for ensuring that commands are only pipelined when it is safe to do so. Practically, this means that many commands cannot be safely pipelined together, and user code will often need to wait for state changing commands to successfully complete before issuing commands that rely on that state change.

🚨 Net::IMAP: Command Injection via ID command argument

Summary

Two Net::IMAP commands, #id and #enable, do not validate their arguments. Arguments to either command could be used by an attacker to inject arbitrary IMAP commands.

Please note that passing untrusted inputs to these commands is usually inappropriate and expected to be uncommon.

Details

When Net::IMAP#id is called with a hash argument, although the ID field value strings are correctly quoted (escaping quoted specials), they were not validated to prohibit CRLF sequences.

While Net::IMAP#enable does process its arguments for aliases, it does not validate them as valid atoms (or as a list of valid atoms). The #to_s value is sent verbatim.

Impact

This is expected to impact very few users: use of untrusted user input for either command is expected to be very uncommon.

The documentation for #enable explicitly warns that using any arguments that are not in the explicitly supported list may result in undocumented behavior. Using arbitrary untrusted user input for #enable will always be inappropriate.

Although client ID field values will most commonly be static and hardcoded, dynamic input sources may be used. For example, client ID fields may be set by configuration or version numbers. Using untrusted user inputs for client ID fields is expected to be uncommon. But any untrusted inputs to client ID can trivially exploit this vulnerability.

Untrusted inputs to either command may include a CRLF sequence followed by a new IMAP command (like DELETE mailbox). Although this does not directly enable data exfiltration, it could be combined with other attack vectors or knowledge of the target system's attributes, e.g.: shared mail folders or the application's installed response handlers.

Mitigation

Update to a version of net-imap which validates #id and #enable arguments.

Untrusted inputs should never be used for #enable arguments.

If net-imap cannot be upgraded:

  • do not use untrusted inputs for client ID field values
  • or add validation that client ID field values must not contain any CR or LF bytes.

🚨 net-imap has quadratic complexity when reading response literals

Summary

Net::IMAP::ResponseReader has quadratic time complexity when reading large responses containing many string literals. A hostile server can send responses which are crafted to exhaust the client's CPU for a denial of service attack.

Details

For each literal in a response, ResponseReader rescans the entire growing response buffer. The regular expression that is used to scan the response buffer runs in linear time. With many literals, this becomes O(nΒ²) total work. The regular expression should run in constant time: it is anchored to the end and only the last 23 bytes of the buffer are relevant.

Because the algorithmic complexity is super-linear, this bypasses protection from max_response_size: a response can stay well below the default size limit while still causing very large CPU cost.

Net::IMAP::ResponseReader runs continuously in the receiver thread until the connection closes.

Impact

This consumes disproportionate CPU time in the client's receiver thread. A hostile server could use this to exhaust the client's CPU for a denial of service attack.

For a response near the default max_response_size, each individual regexp scan could take between 100 to 200ms on common modern hardware, and this may be repeated 200k times per megabyte of response. While the regexp is scanning, it retains the Global VM lock, preventing other threads from running.

Although other threads should not be completely blocked, their run time will be significantly impacted.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a patched version of net-imap that reads responses more efficiently.
  • Do not connect to untrusted IMAP servers.
  • When connecting to untrusted servers, a much smaller max_response_size (for example: 8KiB) will limit the impact. Although this is too small for fetching unpaginated message bodies, it should be enough for most other operations.

🚨 net-imap vulnerable to denial of service via high iteration count for `SCRAM-*` authentication

Summary

When authenticating a connection with SCRAM-SHA1 or SCRAM-SHA256, a hostile server can perform a computational denial-of-service attack on the client process by sending a big iteration count value.

Details

A hostile IMAP server can send an arbitrarily large PBKDF2 iteration count in the SCRAM server-first-message, causing the client to perform an expensive OpenSSL::KDF.pbkdf2_hmac call. Because the PBKDF2 function is a blocking C extension and holds onto Ruby’s Global VM Lock, it can freeze the entire Ruby VM for the duration of the computation.

OpenSSL enforces an effective maximum by using a 32-bit signed integer for the iteration count, Depending on hardware capabilities and OpenSSL version, this iteration count may be sufficient for to block all Ruby threads in the process for over seven minutes.

This is listed as one of the "Security Considerations", in RFC 7804:

A hostile server can perform a computational denial-of-service attack on clients by sending a big iteration count value. In order to defend against that, a client implementation can pick a maximum iteration count that it is willing to use and reject any values that exceed that threshold (in such cases, the client, of course, has to fail the authentication).

Impact

During SCRAM authentication to a hostile server, the entire Ruby VM will be locked for the duration of the computation. Depending on hardware capabilities and OpenSSL version, this may take many minutes.

OpenSSL::KDF.pbkdf2_hmac is a blocking C function, so Timeout cannot be used to guard against this. And it retains the Global VM lock, so other ruby threads will also be unable to run.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a patched version of net-imap that adds the max_iterations option to the SASL-* authenticators, and call Net::IMAP#authenticate with a max_iterations keyword argument.

    NOTE: The default max_iterations is 2Β³ΒΉ - 1, the maximum signed 32 bit integer, the maximum allowed by OpenSSL.
    To prevent a denial of service attack, this must be set to a safe value, depending on hardware and version of OpenSSL.
    It is the user's responsibility to enforce minimum and maximum iteration counts that are appropriate for their security context.

  • Alternatively, avoid SCRAM-* mechanisms when authenticating to untrusted servers.

🚨 net-imap vulnerable to STARTTLS stripping via invalid response timing

Summary

A man-in-the-middle attacker can cause Net::IMAP#starttls to return "successfully", without starting TLS.

Details

When using Net::IMAP#starttls to upgrade a plaintext connection to use TLS, a man-in-the-middle attacker can inject a tagged OK response with an easily predictable tag. By sending the response before the client finishes sending the command, the command completes "successfully" before the response handler is registered. This allows #starttls to return without error, but the response handler is never invoked, the TLS connection is never established, and the socket remains unencrypted.

This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to perform a STARTTLS stripping attack, unless the client code explicitly checks Net::IMAP#tls_verified?.

Impact

TLS bypass, leading to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a patched version of net-imap that raises an exception whenever #starttls does not establish TLS.
  • Connect to an implicit TLS port, rather than use STARTTLS with a cleartext port.
    This is strongly recommended anyway:
    • RFC 8314: Cleartext Considered Obsolete: Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) for Email Submission and Access
    • NO STARTTLS: Why TLS is better without STARTTLS, A Security Analysis of STARTTLS in the Email Context
  • Explicitly verify Net::IMAP#tls_verified? is true, before using the connection after #starttls.

🚨 net-imap vulnerable to command Injection via "raw" arguments to multiple commands

Summary

Several Net::IMAP commands accept a raw string argument that is sent to the server without validation or escaping. If this string is derived from user-controlled input, it may contain contain CRLF sequences, which an attacker can use to inject arbitrary IMAP commands.

Details

Net::IMAP's generic argument handling, used by most command arguments, interprets string arguments as an IMAP astring. Depending on the string contents and the connection's UTF-8 support, this encodes strings as either a atom, quoted, or literal. These are safe from command or argument injection.

But the following commands transform specific String arguments to Net::IMAP::RawData, which bypasses normal argument validation and encoding and prints the string directly to the socket:

  • #uid_search, #search, #uid_sort, #sort, #uid_thread, #thread
    • when criteria is a String, it is sent raw
  • #uid_fetch, `#fetch
    • when attr is a String, it is sent raw
    • when attr is an Array, each String in attr is sent raw
  • #uid_store, #store
    • when attr is a String, it is sent raw
  • #setquota:
    • limit is interpolated with #to_s and that string is sent raw

Because these string arguments are sent without any neutralization, they serve as a direct vector for command splitting. Any user controlled data interpolated into these strings can be used to break out of the intended command context.

Using "raw data" arguments for #uid_store, #store, and #setquota I both inappropriate and unnecessary. Net::IMAP's generic argument handling is sufficient to safely validate and encode their arguments. Users of the library probably do not expect arguments to these commands to be sent raw and might not be wary of passing unvalidated input.

The API for search criteria and fetch attributes is intentionally low-level and "close to the wire". It allows developers to use some IMAP extensions without requiring explicit support from the library and allows developers to use complex IMAP grammar without complex argument translation. Even so, basic validation is appropriate and could neutralize command injection.

Although this was explicitly documented for search criteria, it was insufficiently documented for fetch attr. So developers may not have realized that the attr argument to #fetch and #uid_fetch is sent as "raw data".

Impact

If a developer passes an unvalidated user-controlled input for one of these method arguments, an attacker can append CRLF sequence followed by a new IMAP command (like DELETE mailbox). Although this does not directly enable data exfiltration, it could be combined with other attack vectors or knowledge of the target system's attributes, e.g.: shared mail folders or the application's installed response handlers.

The SEARCH, STORE, and FETCH commands, and their UID variants are some of the most commonly used features of the library. Applications that build search queries or fetch attributes dynamically based on user input (e.g., mail clients or archival tools) may be at significant risk.

The SORT and THREAD commands and their UID variants also handle their search criteria argument similarly to SEARCH and are subject to the same risk.

Expected use of Net::IMAP#setquota is much more limited: SETQUOTA is often only usable by users with special administrative privileges. Depending on the server, quota administration might be managed through server configuration rather than via the IMAP protocol SETQUOTA command. It is expected to be uncommonly used in system administration scripts or in interactive sessions, it should be completely controlled by trusted users, and should only use trusted inputs. Calling #setquota with untrusted user input is expected to be a very uncommon use case. Please note however this might be combined with other attacks, for example CSRF, which provide unauthorized access to trusted inputs, and may specifically target users or scripts with administrator privileges.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of net-imap which:
    • validates that Net::IMAP::RawData is composed of well-formed IMAP text, literal, and literal8 values, with no unescaped NULL, CR, or LF bytes.
    • does not use Net::IMAP::RawData for #store, #uid_store, or #setquota.
  • Prefer to send search criteria as an array of key value pairs. Avoid sending it as an interpolated string.
  • If an immediate upgrade is not possible:
    • String inputs to search criteria and fetch attributes can be validated against command injection by checking for \r and \n characters.
    • Hard-coding the store attr argument is often appropriate. Alternatively, user controlled inputs can be restricted to a small enumerated list which is valid for the calling application.
    • Use Kernel#Integer to coerce and validate user controlled inputs to #setquota limit.

🚨 net-imap vulnerable to command Injection via unvalidated Symbol inputs

Summary

Symbol arguments to commands are vulnerable to a CRLF Injection / IMAP Command injection via Symbol arguments passed to IMAP commands.

Details

Symbol arguments represent IMAP "system flags", which are formatted as "atoms" (with no quoting) with a "\" prefix. Vulnerable versions of Net::IMAP sends the symbol name directly to the socket, with no validation.

Because the Symbol input is unvalidated, it could contain invalid flag characters, including SP and CRLF, which could be used to finish the current command and inject new commands.

Although IMAP flag arguments are only valid input for a few IMAP commands, most Net::IMAP commands use generic argument handling, and will allow Symbol (flag) inputs.

Note also that the list of valid symbol inputs should be restricted to an enumerated set of standard RFC defined flag types, which have each been given specific defined semantics. Any user-provided values outside of that list of standard "system flags" needs to use the IMAP keyword syntax, which are sent as atoms, i.e: string inputs. Under no circumstances should #to_sym ever be called on unvetted user-provided input: that will always be a bug in the calling code for the simple reason that user_input_atom is as \user_input_atom.

For forward compatibility with future IMAP extentions, Net::IMAP, does not restrict flag inputs to an enumerated list. That is the responsibility of the calling application code, which knows which flag semantics are valid for its context.

Impact

If a developer passes user-controlled input as a Symbol to most Net::IMAP commands, an attacker can append CRLF sequence followed by a new IMAP command (like DELETE mailbox).

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a version of Net::IMAP that validates Symbols are valid as an IMAP flag.

  • User-provided input should never be able to control calling #to_sym on string arguments.

    For example, do not unsafely serialize and deserialize command arguments (e.g. with YAML or Marshal) in a way that could create unvetted Symbol arguments.

  • For the few IMAP commands which do allow flag arguments, it may be appropriate to hard-code Symbol arguments or restrict them to an enumerated list which is valid for the calling application.

🚨 net-imap has quadratic complexity when reading response literals

Summary

Net::IMAP::ResponseReader has quadratic time complexity when reading large responses containing many string literals. A hostile server can send responses which are crafted to exhaust the client's CPU for a denial of service attack.

Details

For each literal in a response, ResponseReader rescans the entire growing response buffer. The regular expression that is used to scan the response buffer runs in linear time. With many literals, this becomes O(nΒ²) total work. The regular expression should run in constant time: it is anchored to the end and only the last 23 bytes of the buffer are relevant.

Because the algorithmic complexity is super-linear, this bypasses protection from max_response_size: a response can stay well below the default size limit while still causing very large CPU cost.

Net::IMAP::ResponseReader runs continuously in the receiver thread until the connection closes.

Impact

This consumes disproportionate CPU time in the client's receiver thread. A hostile server could use this to exhaust the client's CPU for a denial of service attack.

For a response near the default max_response_size, each individual regexp scan could take between 100 to 200ms on common modern hardware, and this may be repeated 200k times per megabyte of response. While the regexp is scanning, it retains the Global VM lock, preventing other threads from running.

Although other threads should not be completely blocked, their run time will be significantly impacted.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a patched version of net-imap that reads responses more efficiently.
  • Do not connect to untrusted IMAP servers.
  • When connecting to untrusted servers, a much smaller max_response_size (for example: 8KiB) will limit the impact. Although this is too small for fetching unpaginated message bodies, it should be enough for most other operations.

🚨 net-imap vulnerable to denial of service via high iteration count for `SCRAM-*` authentication

Summary

When authenticating a connection with SCRAM-SHA1 or SCRAM-SHA256, a hostile server can perform a computational denial-of-service attack on the client process by sending a big iteration count value.

Details

A hostile IMAP server can send an arbitrarily large PBKDF2 iteration count in the SCRAM server-first-message, causing the client to perform an expensive OpenSSL::KDF.pbkdf2_hmac call. Because the PBKDF2 function is a blocking C extension and holds onto Ruby’s Global VM Lock, it can freeze the entire Ruby VM for the duration of the computation.

OpenSSL enforces an effective maximum by using a 32-bit signed integer for the iteration count, Depending on hardware capabilities and OpenSSL version, this iteration count may be sufficient for to block all Ruby threads in the process for over seven minutes.

This is listed as one of the "Security Considerations", in RFC 7804:

A hostile server can perform a computational denial-of-service attack on clients by sending a big iteration count value. In order to defend against that, a client implementation can pick a maximum iteration count that it is willing to use and reject any values that exceed that threshold (in such cases, the client, of course, has to fail the authentication).

Impact

During SCRAM authentication to a hostile server, the entire Ruby VM will be locked for the duration of the computation. Depending on hardware capabilities and OpenSSL version, this may take many minutes.

OpenSSL::KDF.pbkdf2_hmac is a blocking C function, so Timeout cannot be used to guard against this. And it retains the Global VM lock, so other ruby threads will also be unable to run.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a patched version of net-imap that adds the max_iterations option to the SASL-* authenticators, and call Net::IMAP#authenticate with a max_iterations keyword argument.

    NOTE: The default max_iterations is 2Β³ΒΉ - 1, the maximum signed 32 bit integer, the maximum allowed by OpenSSL.
    To prevent a denial of service attack, this must be set to a safe value, depending on hardware and version of OpenSSL.
    It is the user's responsibility to enforce minimum and maximum iteration counts that are appropriate for their security context.

  • Alternatively, avoid SCRAM-* mechanisms when authenticating to untrusted servers.

🚨 net-imap vulnerable to command Injection via unvalidated Symbol inputs

Summary

Symbol arguments to commands are vulnerable to a CRLF Injection / IMAP Command injection via Symbol arguments passed to IMAP commands.

Details

Symbol arguments represent IMAP "system flags", which are formatted as "atoms" (with no quoting) with a "\" prefix. Vulnerable versions of Net::IMAP sends the symbol name directly to the socket, with no validation.

Because the Symbol input is unvalidated, it could contain invalid flag characters, including SP and CRLF, which could be used to finish the current command and inject new commands.

Although IMAP flag arguments are only valid input for a few IMAP commands, most Net::IMAP commands use generic argument handling, and will allow Symbol (flag) inputs.

Note also that the list of valid symbol inputs should be restricted to an enumerated set of standard RFC defined flag types, which have each been given specific defined semantics. Any user-provided values outside of that list of standard "system flags" needs to use the IMAP keyword syntax, which are sent as atoms, i.e: string inputs. Under no circumstances should #to_sym ever be called on unvetted user-provided input: that will always be a bug in the calling code for the simple reason that user_input_atom is as \user_input_atom.

For forward compatibility with future IMAP extentions, Net::IMAP, does not restrict flag inputs to an enumerated list. That is the responsibility of the calling application code, which knows which flag semantics are valid for its context.

Impact

If a developer passes user-controlled input as a Symbol to most Net::IMAP commands, an attacker can append CRLF sequence followed by a new IMAP command (like DELETE mailbox).

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a version of Net::IMAP that validates Symbols are valid as an IMAP flag.

  • User-provided input should never be able to control calling #to_sym on string arguments.

    For example, do not unsafely serialize and deserialize command arguments (e.g. with YAML or Marshal) in a way that could create unvetted Symbol arguments.

  • For the few IMAP commands which do allow flag arguments, it may be appropriate to hard-code Symbol arguments or restrict them to an enumerated list which is valid for the calling application.

🚨 net-imap vulnerable to command Injection via "raw" arguments to multiple commands

Summary

Several Net::IMAP commands accept a raw string argument that is sent to the server without validation or escaping. If this string is derived from user-controlled input, it may contain contain CRLF sequences, which an attacker can use to inject arbitrary IMAP commands.

Details

Net::IMAP's generic argument handling, used by most command arguments, interprets string arguments as an IMAP astring. Depending on the string contents and the connection's UTF-8 support, this encodes strings as either a atom, quoted, or literal. These are safe from command or argument injection.

But the following commands transform specific String arguments to Net::IMAP::RawData, which bypasses normal argument validation and encoding and prints the string directly to the socket:

  • #uid_search, #search, #uid_sort, #sort, #uid_thread, #thread
    • when criteria is a String, it is sent raw
  • #uid_fetch, `#fetch
    • when attr is a String, it is sent raw
    • when attr is an Array, each String in attr is sent raw
  • #uid_store, #store
    • when attr is a String, it is sent raw
  • #setquota:
    • limit is interpolated with #to_s and that string is sent raw

Because these string arguments are sent without any neutralization, they serve as a direct vector for command splitting. Any user controlled data interpolated into these strings can be used to break out of the intended command context.

Using "raw data" arguments for #uid_store, #store, and #setquota I both inappropriate and unnecessary. Net::IMAP's generic argument handling is sufficient to safely validate and encode their arguments. Users of the library probably do not expect arguments to these commands to be sent raw and might not be wary of passing unvalidated input.

The API for search criteria and fetch attributes is intentionally low-level and "close to the wire". It allows developers to use some IMAP extensions without requiring explicit support from the library and allows developers to use complex IMAP grammar without complex argument translation. Even so, basic validation is appropriate and could neutralize command injection.

Although this was explicitly documented for search criteria, it was insufficiently documented for fetch attr. So developers may not have realized that the attr argument to #fetch and #uid_fetch is sent as "raw data".

Impact

If a developer passes an unvalidated user-controlled input for one of these method arguments, an attacker can append CRLF sequence followed by a new IMAP command (like DELETE mailbox). Although this does not directly enable data exfiltration, it could be combined with other attack vectors or knowledge of the target system's attributes, e.g.: shared mail folders or the application's installed response handlers.

The SEARCH, STORE, and FETCH commands, and their UID variants are some of the most commonly used features of the library. Applications that build search queries or fetch attributes dynamically based on user input (e.g., mail clients or archival tools) may be at significant risk.

The SORT and THREAD commands and their UID variants also handle their search criteria argument similarly to SEARCH and are subject to the same risk.

Expected use of Net::IMAP#setquota is much more limited: SETQUOTA is often only usable by users with special administrative privileges. Depending on the server, quota administration might be managed through server configuration rather than via the IMAP protocol SETQUOTA command. It is expected to be uncommonly used in system administration scripts or in interactive sessions, it should be completely controlled by trusted users, and should only use trusted inputs. Calling #setquota with untrusted user input is expected to be a very uncommon use case. Please note however this might be combined with other attacks, for example CSRF, which provide unauthorized access to trusted inputs, and may specifically target users or scripts with administrator privileges.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of net-imap which:
    • validates that Net::IMAP::RawData is composed of well-formed IMAP text, literal, and literal8 values, with no unescaped NULL, CR, or LF bytes.
    • does not use Net::IMAP::RawData for #store, #uid_store, or #setquota.
  • Prefer to send search criteria as an array of key value pairs. Avoid sending it as an interpolated string.
  • If an immediate upgrade is not possible:
    • String inputs to search criteria and fetch attributes can be validated against command injection by checking for \r and \n characters.
    • Hard-coding the store attr argument is often appropriate. Alternatively, user controlled inputs can be restricted to a small enumerated list which is valid for the calling application.
    • Use Kernel#Integer to coerce and validate user controlled inputs to #setquota limit.

🚨 net-imap vulnerable to STARTTLS stripping via invalid response timing

Summary

A man-in-the-middle attacker can cause Net::IMAP#starttls to return "successfully", without starting TLS.

Details

When using Net::IMAP#starttls to upgrade a plaintext connection to use TLS, a man-in-the-middle attacker can inject a tagged OK response with an easily predictable tag. By sending the response before the client finishes sending the command, the command completes "successfully" before the response handler is registered. This allows #starttls to return without error, but the response handler is never invoked, the TLS connection is never established, and the socket remains unencrypted.

This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to perform a STARTTLS stripping attack, unless the client code explicitly checks Net::IMAP#tls_verified?.

Impact

TLS bypass, leading to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a patched version of net-imap that raises an exception whenever #starttls does not establish TLS.
  • Connect to an implicit TLS port, rather than use STARTTLS with a cleartext port.
    This is strongly recommended anyway:
    • RFC 8314: Cleartext Considered Obsolete: Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) for Email Submission and Access
    • NO STARTTLS: Why TLS is better without STARTTLS, A Security Analysis of STARTTLS in the Email Context
  • Explicitly verify Net::IMAP#tls_verified? is true, before using the connection after #starttls.
Release Notes

0.6.6

What's Changed

Fixed

  • πŸ› Fix incorrect regexp for testing if string is quotable by @nevans in #723
    This bug was introduced by v0.6.5 as part of #712.
    It causes some valid string arguments (which should be sent as IMAP literal values) to raise a DataFormatError exception (without sending).

Full Changelog: v0.6.5...v0.6.6

0.6.5

What's Changed

Added

  • 🧡 Add thread join timeout to #disconnect by @nevans in #689
  • ✨ Add #utf8_enabled? by @nevans in #715
  • ✨ Remember set of enabled server capabilities by @nevans in #716
    Adds #enabled and #enabled? methods.

Fixed

  • πŸ₯… Fix premature tagged response guard for IDLE by @nevans in #688
  • πŸ₯… Test for NULL bytes before sending string args by @nevans in #712
  • πŸ› Use literal syntax for invalid UTF8 or non-UTF8 strings by @nevans in #713

Other Changes

  • 🧡πŸ₯… Reraise receiver thread errors with caller's backtrace by @nevans in #691
  • 🧡πŸ₯… Reraise #starttls receiver thread errors with caller's backtrace by @nevans in #711
  • ♻️ Extract InvalidTaggedResponseError error by @nevans in #687
  • 🧡 Refactor thread synchronization for sending commands by @nevans in #692
  • 🧡Refactor receive responses thread sync by @nevans in #694
  • ♻️ Extract handle_response from receive_responses by @nevans in #695

Miscellaneous

  • πŸ”€ Merge v0.6.4.1 patches by @nevans in #702
  • Fix flaky test_starttls_stripping_ok_sent_before_response by @hsbt in #709
  • ⬆️ Bump actions/checkout from 6 to 7 by @dependabot[bot] in #708
  • βœ…βš‘ Faster tests by @nevans in #714
  • Pin simplecov version by @nobu in #717
  • simplecov-{html,json} have been incorporated in SimpleCov 1.0.0 by @nobu in #718
  • ⬆️ Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.19.4 to 2.20.0 by @dependabot[bot] in #719
  • βœ… Fix issues with simplecov v1.0 upgrade by @nevans in #721

Full Changelog: v0.6.4.1...v0.6.5

0.6.4.1

What's Changed

πŸ”’ Security

This release fixes several more security vulnerabilities which are related to the fixes in v0.6.4. Please see the linked security advisories for more information.

  • (moderate) Command Injection via non-synchronizing literal in "raw" argument (CVE-2026-47240, GHSA-8p34-64r3-mwg8)
    This vulnerability depends how the server interprets non-synchronizing literals.
    The connection is not vulnerable if the server supports non-synchronizing literals.
    • πŸ₯… Validate non-synchronizing literals support by @nevans in #701
  • (moderate) Command Injection via unvalidated ID and ENABLE arguments (CVE-2026-47242, GHSA-46q3-7gv7-qmgg)
    • πŸ₯… Validate ID values contain only valid bytes by @nevans in #698
    • πŸ₯… Validate #enable arguments are all atoms by @nevans in #699
      NOTE: #enable should never be called with untrusted input.
  • (low) Denial of Service via incomplete "raw" argument validation (CVE-2026-47241, GHSA-c4fp-cxrr-mj66)
    This results in the affected command hanging until the connection is closed. If another thread attempts to send a concurrent pipelined command, the first thread will return with a syntax error and the second thread will hang until the connection closes.
    • Reported by @fg0x0
    • πŸ› Prevent trailing {0} in RawData validation by @nevans in #700

Added

  • πŸ” Add more detail to Net::IMAP#inspect TLS info by @nevans in #674

Fixed

  • πŸ”§ Disallow config.max_non_synchronizing_literal = nil by @nevans in #672
  • 🧡 Fix deadlock in #disconnect by @nevans in #686
  • πŸ₯… Validate that Atom and Flag are not empty by @nevans in #684

Documentation

  • ⚠️ Boost visibility of raw data argument documentation warnings by @nevans in #677

Other Changes

  • 🏷️ Allow 64-bit Integer arguments by @nevans in #675
  • πŸ₯… Ensure send_number_data input is an Integer by @nevans in #676
  • ♻️ Improve RawData.new, Add RawData.split by @nevans in #679
  • 🏷️ Less strict number string coercion, to match RFCs by @nevans in #680
  • πŸ₯… Validate response literal byte size format by @nevans in #681

Miscellaneous

  • ⬆️ Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.19.0 to 2.19.1 by @dependabot[bot] in #673
  • βœ… Improvements to tests' FakeServer by @nevans in #678
  • ⬆️ Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.19.1 to 2.19.3 by @dependabot[bot] in #682
  • ⬆️ Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.19.3 to 2.19.4 by @dependabot[bot] in #683

Full Changelog: v0.6.4...v0.6.4.1

0.6.4

What's Changed

πŸ”’ Security

This release contains fixes for multiple vulnerabilities concerning STARTTLS stripping, argument validation, and denial of service attacks.

Warning

#664 fixes a STARTTLS stripping vulnerability (GHSA-vcgp-9326-pqcp).
Without this fix, a man-in-the-middle attacker can cause Net::IMAP#starttls to return "successfully", without starting TLS.

Important

Argument validation is significantly improved. Several injection vulnerabilities have been fixed:
#657 fixes CRLF/command/argument injection via Symbol arguments (GHSA-75xq-5h9v-w6px).
#658 fixes CRLF/command/argument injection via the attr argument to #store/#uid_store (GHSA-hm49-wcqc-g2xg)
#659 fixes CRLF/command/argument injection via the storage_limit argument to #setquota (GHSA-hm49-wcqc-g2xg).
#660 fixes CRLF/command injection via RawData (GHSA-hm49-wcqc-g2xg):

  • #search and #uid_search send criteria as raw data, when it is a String
  • #fetch and #uid_fetch send attr as raw data, when it is a String.
    When attr is an Array, its String members are sent as raw data.

Caution

RawData does not defend against other forms of argument injection! It is an intentionally low-level API.

Note

Two denial of service vulnerabilities have been addressed.
These are generally only relevant when connecting to an untrusted hostile server (or without TLS).

#642 fixes quadratic time complexity when reading large responses containing many string literals (GHSA-q2mw-fvj9-vvcw).
#654 adds a configurable max_iterations count for SCRAM-* authentication (GHSA-87pf-fpwv-p7m7).

The default ScramAuthenticator#max_iterations is 2**31 - 1 (max 32-bit signed int), which was already OpenSSL's maximum value. It provides no protection against hostile servers unless it is explicitly set to a lower value by the user.

Breaking Changes

  • ⚑ ResponseReader memoizes Config#max_response_size in #642.
    Changes to #max_response_size now take effect once per response, not on every IO#read.
    NOTE: It is not expected that this will affect any current usage. See the PR for details.

Added

  • ✨ Support BINARY extention to #append (RFC3516) by @nevans in #616
  • ✨ Support LITERAL+ and LITERAL- non-synchronizing literals (RFC7888) by @nevans in #649
  • πŸ”’ Add ScramAuthenticator#max_iterations by @nevans in #654
  • 🏷️ Add number64 and nz-number64 to NumValidator by @nevans in #625
  • ♻️ Add MailboxQuota#quota_root alias by @nevans in #636
  • πŸ” Simplify Net::IMAP#inspect with basic state by @nevans in #612
  • πŸ₯… Add ResponseParseError#parser_methods (and override #==) by @nevans in #615

Fixed

  • πŸ”’ Fix STARTTLS stripping vulnerability in #664, reported by @Masamuneee
  • Argument validation, reported by @manunio
    • πŸ”’οΈ Strictly validate symbol (\flag) arguments in #657
    • πŸ”’οΈ Validate and send STORE attr as an atom in #658
    • πŸ”’ Validate #setquota storage limit argument in #659
    • πŸ”’ Validate RawData for CRLF injection in #660
    • πŸ“š Improve documentation of RawData arguments in #661
  • ⚑ Much faster ResponseReader performance by @nevans in #642
  • πŸ₯… Successfully parse invalid response code data by @nevans in #614
  • Fix JRuby SSL connection failure: use SSLContext#setup instead of #freeze by @idahomst in #627
  • πŸ› Fix InvalidResponseError in #get_tagged_response by @nevans in #633
  • Pass an Exception to #raise by @eregon in #643
  • πŸ› Fix empty SearchResult#to_sequence_set in #644, reported by @Quintasan
  • πŸ› Wait to continue RawData literals by @nevans in #660

Documentation

  • πŸ“š Fix rdoc 7.2 compatibility (section bugfix) by @nevans in #617
  • πŸ“š Switch back to rdoc's darkfish generator (🚧TMP) by @nevans in #618
  • πŸ“š Use .document and .rdoc_options files, where possible by @nevans in #619
  • Update README example: Expunge is implicit in MOVE by @sebbASF in #623
  • πŸ“šοΈ Fix QUOTA documentation by @nevans in #636
  • πŸ“š Minor documentation fixes by @nevans in #638
  • πŸ“š Improve documentation of RawData arguments by @nevans in #661

Other Changes

  • Handle deep response recursion as ResponseParseError by @Masamuneee in #629

Miscellaneous

  • βœ… Fix typo in FakeServer (tests only) by @nevans in #620
  • ⬆️ Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.14.2 to 2.15.0 by @dependabot[bot] in #621
  • Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.15.0 to 2.15.1 by @dependabot[bot] in #626
  • ⬆️ Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.15.1 to 2.16.0 by @dependabot[bot] in #628
  • ⬆️ Bump actions/configure-pages from 5 to 6 by @dependabot[bot] in #635
  • βœ… Test #setquota by @nevans in #636
  • ⬆️ Bump actions/deploy-pages from 4 to 5 by @dependabot[bot] in #634
  • ⬆️ Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.16.0 to 2.17.0 by @dependabot[bot] in #639
  • Test TruffleRuby release in CI for improved stability by @eregon in #640
  • ⬆️ Bump actions/upload-pages-artifact from 4 to 5 by @dependabot[bot] in #646
  • ⬆️ Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.17.0 to 2.19.0 by @dependabot[bot] in #647

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v0.6.3...v0.6.4

0.6.3

What's Changed

Added

  • πŸ₯… Add parser state and #detailed_message to ResponseParseError by @nevans in #599
    • πŸ₯…πŸ’„ Support (monochrome) highlights in parse error details by @nevans in #603
    • πŸ₯…πŸ’„ Auto-highlight parse error detailed_message using TERM and FORCE_COLOR by @nevans in #607
    • πŸ₯…πŸ’„ Add color highlights to parse error details (default honors NO_COLOR) by @nevans in #609
  • πŸ”§ Add Config#overrides? (opposite of #inherited?) by @nevans in #610
  • πŸ”§ Add recursive Config#inherits_defaults? by @nevans in #611

Fixed

  • πŸ› Parse resp-text with invalid resp-text-code by @nevans in #601
  • πŸ› Config.version_defaults should be read only by @nevans in #594

Other Changes

  • πŸ₯… Only print parser debug for unhandled errors by @nevans in #600
  • ♻️ Don't hardcode parser deprecation warning uplevel by @nevans in #602
  • ♻️ Simplify Config::AttrAccessors a little by @nevans in #606
  • ♻️ Set Config[:default] as alias of Config[VERSION] by @nevans in #608

Fixes for unreleased code:

  • πŸ› Return ResponseText from resp-text fallback by @nevans in #605
  • πŸ› Fix parse error parser_backtrace (for ruby <= 3.3) by @nevans in #604

Miscellaneous

  • Delete test/net/imap/test_data_lite.rb by @nobu in #593
  • ⬆️ Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.14.0 to 2.14.1 by @dependabot[bot] in #596
  • Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.14.1 to 2.14.2 by @dependabot[bot] in #598

Full Changelog: v0.6.2...v0.6.3

0.6.2

What's Changed

Fixed

Full Changelog: v0.6.1...v0.6.2

0.6.1

What's Changed

Fixed

  • πŸ› Fix SequenceSet#max(n) when cardinality < n <= size by @nevans in #580

Miscellaneous

  • ⬆️ Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.13.3 to 2.14.0 by @dependabot[bot] in #579

Full Changelog: v0.6.0...v0.6.1

0.6.0

What's Changed

Breaking Changes

  • πŸ”§ Update default config for v0.6 by @nevans in #539
    • responses_without_block changed from :warn to :frozen_dup
    • parser_use_deprecated_uidplus_data changed from :up_to_max_size to false (and is deprecated)
    • parser_max_deprecated_uidplus_data_size changed from 100 to 0 (and is deprecated)
  • πŸ”₯ Use psych (>= 5.2.5) for encoding Data objects by @nevans in #543
    This changes the YAML tag for Data subclasses from ruby/object:Net::IMAP::DataSubclass to ruby/data:Net::IMAP::DataSubclass. YAML dumped by earlier net-imap versions may not load correctly. Psych >= 5.2.5 is required to dump these objects correctly.
  • πŸ’₯ Require ruby >= 3.2 (drop support for 3.1) by @nevans in #538
  • πŸ’₯✨ Change SequenceSet#size to count * and repeated numbers by @nevans in #564
    SequenceSet is used to represent both sorted sets and ordered lists (which may contain duplicates). Members are non-zero UInt32 numbers, but "*" has special meaning as "the number corresponding to the last mailbox entry". So there are four different ways to count the members of a SequenceSet.
    Previously, #size was an alias for #count. Now it differs in both relevant aspects.
    * is a unique member * is treated like 2Β³Β² - 1
    distinct set members #cardinality #count
    ordered list, including duplicates #size #count_with_duplicates
  • πŸ”₯ Remove deprecated UIDPlusData class by @nevans in #540
    UIDPlusData was deprecated by v0.5.6. AppendUIDData or CopyUIDData will always be returned instead.
  • πŸ”₯ Delete deprecated MessageSet by @nevans in #573
    MessageSet was deprecated by v0.5.0. Use SequenceSet instead.
  • πŸ’₯ Do not include OpenSSL and OpenSSL::SSL modules into Net::IMAP by @nevans in #533
    This only affects the ability to use OpenSSL constants from the Net::IMAP namespace.
  • πŸ’₯ Don't set verify_callback to VerifyCallbackProc by @nevans in #534
    This functionality was never documented and is redundant with the verify_callback option.

Deprecated

  • Deprecated config options for UIDPlusData in #540
    The parser_use_deprecated_uidplus_data and parser_max_deprecated_uidplus_data_size config options will be removed in v0.7.0. They are kept for backward compatibility, but they do not affect response parser results. When parser_use_deprecated_uidplus_data is changed from the default value (false), deprecation warnings are printed when parsing APPENDUID or COPYUID response codes.

Added

  • πŸ”’ Add when_capabilities_cached option for Config#sasl_ir by @nevans in #561
  • Net::IMAP::Config improvements
    • πŸ” Improve Config#inspect output by @nevans in #546
    • πŸ” Improve Config#pretty_print (for Kernel::pp) by @nevans in #547
    • πŸ”§ Update Config#inherited? for any number of args by @nevans in #552
  • Net::IMAP::SequenceSet improvements
    • ✨ Add SequenceSet#intersect! for in-place set AND by @nevans in #549
    • ✨ Add SequenceSet#xor! for in-place set XOR by @nevans in #550
    • ♻️ Coalesce entries in SequenceSet#append by @nevans in #553
    • ✨ Add SequenceSet#normalized? by @nevans in #558
    • ✨ Add SequenceSet#cardinality method by @nevans in #563
    • πŸ’₯✨ Change SequenceSet#size to count * and repeated numbers by @nevans in #564
  • Net::IMAP::NumValidator improvements
    • 🏷️ Support mod-sequence-valzer (RFC4551) in NumValidator by @nevans in #570
    • 🏷️ Add NumValidator.coerce_{type} methods by @nevans in #571

Documentation

  • πŸ“š Improve rdoc example for #uid_fetch with partial by @nevans in #532
  • πŸ“š Document SearchResult/ESearchResult compatibility by @nevans in #559
  • πŸ“š Minor rdoc formatting fixes by @nevans in #560

Other Changes

  • πŸ”₯ Drop Data polyfill by @nevans in #541
    This was only used for ruby 3.1, which is no longer supported. So this is not considered a breaking change.
  • ♻️ Refactor Config.versioned_defaults to reduce merge conflcts by @nevans in #544
  • Improved Net::IMAP::SequenceSet performance
    • ⚑️ Don't memoize SequenceSet#string on normalized sets by @nevans in #554
    • ⚑ Faster SequenceSet#normalize when frozen by @nevans in #556
    • ⚑️ Faster SequenceSet#full? by @nevans in #565
    • ⚑️ Slightly faster SequenceSet#xor by @nevans in #567
    • ⚑ Avoid allocating arrays for SequenceSet bsearch (♻️ extract abstract strategy methods) by @nevans in #569
    • ♻️ Rename SequenceSet internals by @nevans in #562
    • ♻️ Reorganize SequenceSet internals by @nevans in #568

Miscellaneous

  • βœ… Stop using deprecated UIDPlusData in tests by @nevans in #542
  • ⬆️ Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.13.1 to 2.13.2 by @dependabot[bot] in #548
  • πŸ› Fix workflow to deploy RDoc to GitHub pages by @nevans in #551
  • ⬆️ Bump actions/checkout from 5 to 6 by @dependabot[bot] in #555
  • πŸ“¦ Update release.yml for github_actions label by @nevans in #557
  • ⬆️ Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.13.2 to 2.13.3 by @dependabot[bot] in #566
  • πŸ”– Release 0.6 by @nevans in #574
  • Workarounds for "Publishing gem fails with digest gem activation failure" issue #576
    • πŸ“¦ Use latest rubygems/bundler to release gem by @nevans in #575
    • πŸ“¦ Drop digest from Gemfile by @nevans in #577

Full Changelog: v0.5.12...v0.6.0

0.5.12

What's Changed

TruffleRuby is not (yet) "officially supported" but it seems to work (with a few small caveats). Several tests are still marked as pending, but the rest all pass. #528 protects us from merging PRs that break TruffleRuby and (in some cases) JRuby.

Fixed

  • πŸ› Fix loading of net/imap for JRuby/TruffleRuby by @nevans in #530

Miscellaneous

  • βœ… Test overriding inherited ::Data methods by @nevans in #531
  • βœ… Add TruffleRuby to CI by @nevans in #528

Full Changelog: v0.5.11...v0.5.12

0.5.11

What's Changed

Added

  • ✨ Add ESearchResult#to_sequence_set by @nevans in #511
  • ✨ Add ESearchResult#each by @nevans in #513
  • ✨ Add VanishedData#each, delegated to #uids.each_number by @nevans in #522
  • support new Ractor.shareable_proc by @ko1 in #525

Fixed

  • πŸ› Fix SearchResult#== for LHS with no modseq by @nevans in #514

Other Changes

  • ✨ Allow obj.to_sequence_set => nil in try_convert by @nevans in #512
  • ♻️ Allow VanishedData#uids to be SequenceSet.empty by @nevans in #517
  • πŸ₯… Raise ArgumentError for #fetch with partial by @nevans in #521

Documentation

  • πŸ“š Fix rdoc call-seq for uid_expunge by @nevans in #516
  • πŸ“š Add QRESYNC to #enable (docs only) by @nevans in #518

Miscellaneous

  • βœ… Organize test files by @nevans in #515
  • βœ… Fix flaky tests with FakeServer#Connection#close mutex by @nevans in #520
  • Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.13.0 to 2.13.1 by @dependabot[bot] in #524

New Contributors

  • @ko1 made their first contribution in #525

Full Changelog: v0.5.10...v0.5.11

0.5.10

What's Changed

Added

  • πŸ”Ž Update SequenceSet#inspect format to Net::IMAP::SequenceSet(#{string}) by @nevans in #501
  • βš‘πŸ”Ž Abridge SequenceSet#inspect output for more than 512 entries by @nevans in #502

Fixed

  • πŸ› Fix spelling of \Remote mailbox attr constant by @voxik in #509

Documentation

  • πŸ“šπŸ› Fix mistake in SequenceSet#string= rdoc by @nevans in #497
  • πŸ“šπŸ› Fix SequenceSet creation rdoc example output by @nevans in #499

Other Changes

  • πŸ₯… Improve ArgumentError in SequenceSet#string= by @nevans in #498
  • ♻️ Refactor SequenceSet#dup, #clone, and #replace by @nevans in #505

Miscellaneous

  • ⬆️ Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.12.1 to 2.12.2 by @dependabot[bot] in #496
  • ⬆️ Bump step-security/harden-runner from 2.12.2 to 2.13.0 by @dependabot[bot] in #500
  • πŸ“‰ Add SequenceSet benchmarks by @nevans in #485
  • πŸ“‰ Fix benchmark data for SequenceSet#normalize by @nevans in #503
  • ⚑ Add vernier profiler for SequenceSet tests and benchmarks by @nevans in #504
  • ⬆️ Bump actions/upload-pages-artifact from 3 to 4 by @dependabot[bot] in #507
  • ⬆️ Bump actions/checkout from 4 to 5 by @dependabot[bot] in #506

Full Changelog: v0.5.9...v0.5.10

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ nio4r (indirect, 2.7.4 β†’ 2.7.5) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 4 commits:

↗️ nokogiri (indirect, 1.18.9 β†’ 1.19.4) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Nokogiri: Possible Use-After-Free when setting an attribute value via `Nokogiri::XML::Attr#value=` or `#content=`

Summary

Nokogiri’s CRuby native extension could leave a Ruby wrapper pointing to freed memory when replacing the value of an XML attribute. If Ruby code had already accessed an attribute child node, Nokogiri::XML::Attr#value= could free the underlying native child node while the wrapper remained reachable through the document node cache. A later use of the freed child node or a Ruby GC mark could dereference an invalid pointer, causing an invalid read and a possible segfault.

Nokogiri 1.19.4 preserves any already-wrapped attribute child nodes before replacing the attribute value.

JRuby is not affected.

Severity

The Nokogiri maintainers have evaluated this as low severity. Reaching it requires an unusual API-usage pattern that does not arise during normal use. The application must directly access an attribute's child node and then replace that same attribute's value via Attr#value= or #content=. Nokogiri 1.19.4 makes this pattern safe with no change to the public API. Already-wrapped attribute child nodes are preserved before the value is replaced.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri 1.19.4 or later.

As a workaround, avoid accessing attribute child nodes directly via Attr#child or similar before mutating the same attribute’s value.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Zheng Yu from depthfirst.com.

🚨 Nokogiri: Possible Use-After-Free when setting `Document#root=` to an invalid node type

Summary

Nokogiri::XML::Document#root= validated only that the new root was a Nokogiri::XML::Node, allowing a DTD node to be set as the document root. The result is a heap use-after-free during garbage collection or finalization, leading to an invalid memory read or potentially a segfault.

Nokogiri 1.19.4 restricts Document#root= to element nodes, raising TypeError for any other node type.

This memory-safety issue affects only the CRuby implementation (libxml2). The JRuby implementation was not affected; the same input validation was added there for behavioral parity.

Severity

The Nokogiri maintainers have evaluated this as low severity. This is only triggered by a programming error. It requires application code to assign a non-element node such as a DTD as the document root via Document#root=. Nokogiri 1.19.4 now raises TypeError instead of allowing a use-after-free. It cannot be triggered by untrusted input or through normal use of the public API.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri 1.19.4 or later.

As a workaround, applications that cannot upgrade should avoid assigning a DTD (or any non-element node) via Document#root=.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Zheng Yu from depthfirst.com.

🚨 Nokogiri: Possible Use-After-Free when directly using `NokogirI::XML::XPathContext` beyond document lifetime

Summary

Nokogiri::XML::XPathContext did not keep its source document alive for garbage collection. If an XPathContext outlived its document and the document was collected, evaluating an XPath expression could read invalid memory and potentially segfault.

This is only reachable when application code constructs an XPathContext directly and lets the document become unreachable while continuing to use the context. The normal Document#xpath, #css, and related search methods are not affected, and it is not triggerable by malicious document input.

Nokogiri 1.19.4 makes XPathContext keep its source document alive for as long as the context exists.

Only the CRuby implementation is affected. JRuby is not affected.

Severity

The Nokogiri maintainers have evaluated this as low severity. Reaching it requires an unusual API-usage pattern that does not arise during normal use. The application must construct an XML::XPathContext directly and continue using it after allowing its source document to be garbage-collected. Nokogiri 1.19.4 makes this pattern safe with no change to the public API. The context now keeps its source document alive for as long as it exists.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri 1.19.4 or later.

As a workaround, ensure the source document remains referenced for as long as any XPathContext created from it is in use. The standard Document#xpath, #css, and related search methods already do this and are unaffected.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Zheng Yu from depthfirst.com.

🚨 Nokogiri: Possible Use-After-Free in XInclude Processing

Summary

XInclude substitution performed by Nokogiri::XML::Node#do_xinclude replaced each <xi:include> in place, freeing the include node along with its children (such as <xi:fallback> and its descendants) and any namespaces declared on them. If an application had already exposed one of those nodes or namespaces to Ruby, the corresponding Ruby object was left pointing at freed memory. Using the object could result in invalid reads or writes to memory.

Nokogiri 1.19.4 substitutes each <xi:include> on a defensive copy by default, so the structures libxml2 frees are never the ones bound to live Ruby objects.

Only the CRuby implementation is affected; JRuby is not affected.

Severity

The Nokogiri maintainers have evaluated this as low severity. Reaching it requires an unusual API-usage pattern that does not arise during normal use. The application must parse a document without XInclude, traverse into an <xi:include> subtree to expose its nodes or namespaces to Ruby, and only then invoke XInclude processing. The common case, requesting XInclude at parse time, operates on a freshly parsed document whose nodes are not yet exposed to Ruby and is not affected. Nokogiri 1.19.4 makes this pattern safe by default and requires no change to application code.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri 1.19.4 or later.

As a workaround for earlier versions, perform XInclude substitution at parse time (with the xinclude parse option) rather than calling #do_xinclude on a document that has already been traversed. A freshly parsed document has no nodes exposed to Ruby, so the substitution is safe.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Zheng Yu from depthfirst.com.

🚨 Nokogiri: Possible Use-After-Free when `Nokogiri::XML::Document#encoding=` raises an exception

Summary

Calling Document#encoding= with an invalid encoding (e.g., a non-string, or a string containing a null byte) raises an exception, but only after freeing the document's current encoding string without replacing it. The document is left referencing freed memory, so the next call to Document#encoding reads invalid memory, which can cause a segfault or leak freed bytes into a Ruby String.

Affects the CRuby (libxml2) implementation only; JRuby is not affected.

Severity

The Nokogiri maintainers have evaluated this as low severity. Reaching it requires an unusual API-usage pattern that does not arise during normal use. The application must pass an invalid encoding to Document#encoding=, rescue the resulting exception, and then continue using the same document. Nokogiri 1.19.4 makes this pattern safe with no change to the public API. The document no longer references freed memory after the exception is raised.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri 1.19.4 or later.

If users are unable to upgrade, avoid passing attacker-controlled values to Document#encoding=. Applications that only assign developer-authored encodings are not directly exposed.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Zheng Yu from depthfirst.com.

🚨 Nokogiri: XML::Schema on JRuby allows network requests when NONET is set, bypassing CVE-2020-26247

Summary

The NONET parse option, which Nokogiri turns on by default for Nokogiri::XML::Schema (see CVE-2020-26247), was not correctly enforced on the JRuby implementation. As a result, a schema parsed with default options could still cause external resources to be fetched over the network, potentially enabling SSRF or XXE attacks.

Nokogiri 1.19.4 replaces the scheme denylist with an allowlist. When NONET is enabled, only local resources (a file: scheme, or a relative or absolute path with no scheme) are resolved, and every network scheme is blocked, case-insensitively. This brings the JRuby behavior in line with CRuby.

Only the JRuby implementation is affected. CRuby is not affected, because libxml2's xmlNoNetExternalEntityLoader blocks all network schemes at the I/O layer regardless of scheme or case.

Severity

The Nokogiri maintainers have evaluated this as low severity (CVSS 2.6, CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). It is a bypass of CVE-2020-26247, which was scored the same way.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri 1.19.4 or later.

There are no known workarounds for affected versions.

This change properly enforces NONET on JRuby, which is a breaking change for any code that (perhaps unknowingly) relied on the previous behavior to load network resources with default parse options. If you trust your input and want to allow external resources to be accessed over the network, you can explicitly disable NONET, exactly as documented for CVE-2020-26247:

  1. Ensure the input is trusted. Do not enable this option for untrusted input.
  2. Pass a Nokogiri::XML::ParseOptions with the NONET flag turned off:
# allows resources to be accessed over the network for trusted input
schema = Nokogiri::XML::Schema.new(trusted_schema, Nokogiri::XML::ParseOptions.new.nononet)

References

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by @bilerden.

🚨 Nokogiri: Null Pointer Dereference calling methods on uninitialized wrapper classes

Summary

Nokogiri contains a bug when calling certain methods on allocated-but-uninitialized native wrapper classes that inherit from Nokogiri::XML::Node. This caused a NULL pointer dereference that could crash the process.

Nokogiri 1.19.4 checks for missing native data pointers and raises a RuntimeError.

JRuby is not affected.

Severity

The Nokogiri maintainers have evaluated this as low severity. This is only triggered by a programming error. It requires application code to call .allocate directly on a native-backed class and then invoke methods on the resulting uninitialized object. It cannot be triggered by untrusted input or through normal use of the public API.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri 1.19.4 or later.

Avoid calling .allocate directly on Nokogiri native-backed classes. Use the documented constructors and factory methods instead.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Zheng Yu from depthfirst.com.

🚨 Nokogiri: Possible Out-of-Bounds Read in `Nokogiri::XML::NodeSet#[]`

Summary

Nokogiri::XML::NodeSet#[] (and its alias #slice) checked the requested index against the node set's bounds using a 32-bit-truncated copy of the index. A large negative index could pass the check and then be used at full width, reading outside the node set's storage. On CRuby this is an out-of-bounds read that typically crashes the process; on JRuby it is not memory-unsafe but returns an incorrect node.

Nokogiri 1.19.4 performs the bounds check against the full-width index.

Severity

The Nokogiri maintainers have evaluated this as medium severity.

Exploitation requires an application to pass an attacker-controlled integer to NodeSet#[]. The primary impact is a controlled crash (denial of service), with potential for memory disclosure on CRuby.

On JRuby, Nokogiri is not affected by this vulnerability.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri 1.19.4 or later.

As a workaround, applications that index a NodeSet with externally-supplied integers can validate the index against node_set.length before use, or avoid passing untrusted values as an index.

Credit

This issue was responsibly reported by Zheng Yu from depthfirst.com.

🚨 Nokogiri CSS selector tokenizer has regular expression backtracking

Summary

Nokogiri's CSS selector tokenizer contains regular expressions whose construction may result in exponential regex backtracking on adversarial selectors. Three ReDoS vectors are addressed in this release:

  1. String-literal tokenization on certain unterminated quoted-string input.
  2. String-literal tokenization on a separate class of hex-escape-rich input.
  3. Identifier tokenization on hex-escape-rich input.

The public CSS selector methods that funnel through the affected tokenizer are Nokogiri::CSS.xpath_for, Node#css, Node#at_css, Searchable#search, and CSS::Parser#parse.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri >= 1.19.3.

If users are unable to upgrade, two options are available:

  • Avoid the use of attacker-controlled text in CSS selectors. Applications that only pass developer-authored selectors to Nokogiri are not directly exposed.
  • Set global Regexp.timeout (Ruby 3.2+, JRuby 9.4+) to bound parse time.

Severity

The Nokogiri maintainers have evaluated this as High Severity (CVSS 7.5, AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

An attacker able to inject user-supplied text into a CSS selector parse method can cause exponential backtracking, resulting in a potential denial of service.

Resources

Credit

Vector 1 was responsibly reported by @colby-swandale. Vectors 2 and 3 were discovered by @flavorjones during the response to the original report.

🚨 Nokogiri XSLT transform has a memory leak

Summary

Nokogiri's Nokogiri::XSLT::Stylesheet#transform leaks a small heap allocation when passed a Ruby string parameter containing a null byte.

For applications that pass attacker-controlled input through XSLT.transform parameters, this may be a vector for a denial of service attack against long-running processes.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri >= 1.19.3.

Users may also be able to mitigate this issue without upgrading by validating untrusted transform parameters before passing them to Nokogiri::XSLT::Stylesheet#transform.

Severity

The Nokogiri maintainers have evaluated this as Moderate Severity, CVSS 5.3.

Each leaked allocation is approximately 24–32 bytes, so meaningful memory growth requires sustained attacker-controlled traffic at high call rates. The bug does not cause memory corruption, information disclosure, or any change in the behavior of the transform itself, and the string-handling exception is raised as expected.

Applications that do not pass raw attacker-controlled bytes to XSLT parameters are unlikely to be affected in practice.

Resources

Credit

This vulnerability was responsibly reported by @Captainjack-kor.

🚨 Nokogiri does not check the return value from xmlC14NExecute

Summary

Nokogiri's CRuby extension fails to check the return value from xmlC14NExecute in the method Nokogiri::XML::Document#canonicalize and Nokogiri::XML::Node#canonicalize. When canonicalization fails, an empty string is returned instead of raising an exception. This incorrect return value may allow downstream libraries to accept invalid or incomplete canonicalized XML, which has been demonstrated to enable signature validation bypass in SAML libraries.

JRuby is not affected, as the Java implementation correctly raises RuntimeError on canonicalization failure.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Nokogiri >= 1.19.1.

Severity

The maintainers have assessed this as Medium severity. Nokogiri itself is a parsing library without a clear security boundary related to canonicalization, so the direct impact is that a method returns incorrect data on invalid input. However, this behavior was exploited in practice to bypass SAML signature validation in downstream libraries (see References).

Credit

This vulnerability was responsibly reported by HackerOne researcher d4d.

Release Notes

1.19.4

v1.19.4 / 2026-06-18

Security

  • [CRuby] (Low) Fixed a possible invalid memory read when XML::Node#initialize_copy_with_args is called with an argument that is not a Node. See GHSA-g9g8-vgvw-g3vf for more information.
  • [CRuby] (Low) Fixed a possible use-after-free when an XML::XPathContext is used after its source document has been garbage collected. See GHSA-p67v-3w7g-wjg7 for more information.
  • [CRuby] (Low) Fixed a possible use-after-free during XInclude processing via Node#do_xinclude. See GHSA-wfpw-mmfh-qq69 for more information.
  • [CRuby] (Low) Fixed a possible use-after-free when Document#root= is assigned a non-element node. See GHSA-wjv4-x9w8-wm3h for more information.
  • [CRuby] (Low) Fixed a possible use-after-free when setting an attribute value via XML::Attr#value= or #content=. See GHSA-phwj-rprq-35pp for more information.
  • [CRuby] (Low) Fixed a null pointer dereference when methods are called on uninitialized wrapper objects (e.g. via allocate); these now raise instead of crashing the process. See GHSA-9cv2-cfxc-v4v2 for more information.
  • [CRuby] (Low) Fixed a possible use-after-free when Document#encoding= raises an exception. See GHSA-5v8h-3h3q-446p for more information.
  • [CRuby] (Medium) Fixed an out-of-bounds read in XML::NodeSet#[] (alias #slice) when given a large negative index. See GHSA-5prr-v3j2-97mh for more information.
  • [JRuby] (Low) XML::Schema now enforces the NONET parse option, which Nokogiri enables by default. It was not enforced on JRuby, so a schema parsed with default options could still fetch external resources over the network, potentially enabling SSRF or XXE attacks and bypassing the mitigation for CVE-2020-26247. See GHSA-8678-w3jw-xfc2 for more information.

SHA256 checksums

1269fb644a6de405057a53dd5c762b1209b43ca7424f839454d3dbc677c31a8f  nokogiri-1.19.4-aarch64-linux-gnu.gem
35c65b9ce72b3bb03207bdbe7067915019dc18c1b9b59139684bd6690fdd01af  nokogiri-1.19.4-aarch64-linux-musl.gem
a301313e38bb065d68239e79734bcd6f56fb6efaacebde29e9abf2a4735340ca  nokogiri-1.19.4-arm-linux-gnu.gem
588923c101bcfa78869734d247d25b598674323e7f22474fc468f6e5647311eb  nokogiri-1.19.4-arm-linux-musl.gem
a46db9853286e6597b36ebc6953817d15acf3a299583eb3f89fdc6f91dd63527  nokogiri-1.19.4-arm64-darwin.gem
ce04b9e268c9626852231a48b49128ed52034f1ccb39484a6da3875491cd709e  nokogiri-1.19.4-java.gem
051da97b8eccfdb5444fed40246a35e10d7298b9efe759b4cd25455ea04c587e  nokogiri-1.19.4-x64-mingw-ucrt.gem
7fd17057d3e1f00e9954a74b3cd76595d3d4a5ef233b7ed9599047c204f70551  nokogiri-1.19.4-x86_64-darwin.gem
379fae440b28915e3f19d752ce2dcf8465ed2b2fbefd2a7ca0dd497bc981a06a  nokogiri-1.19.4-x86_64-linux-gnu.gem
17dfb7c1fa194ae02fbf7c51a7afc8d278045ab3fdacfd86f91d02d7b274470b  nokogiri-1.19.4-x86_64-linux-musl.gem
50c951611c92bca05c51411aef45f1cbc50f2821c4802758c5c6d34696533ab5  nokogiri-1.19.4.gem

1.19.3

v1.19.3 / 2026-04-27

Fixed / Security

  • Address exponential regex backtracking in CSS selector tokenizer. See GHSA-c4rq-3m3g-8wgx for more information.
  • [CRuby] Address memory leak in XSLT::Stylesheet#transform. See GHSA-v2fc-qm4h-8hqv for more information.

sha256 checksums

46b89e5d7b9e844c2ee360794240c6ea2a4e6fa0c5892a4ed487db621224b639  nokogiri-1.19.3-aarch64-linux-gnu.gem
8392dfdcd21be7a94dbbe9ccc138dea01b97b24cb2dc02a114ca98bfb1d9a0b7  nokogiri-1.19.3-aarch64-linux-musl.gem
3919d5ffc334ad778a4a9eb88fda7dcb8b1fb58c8a52ac640c6dcd2f038e774f  nokogiri-1.19.3-arm-linux-gnu.gem
9ce1cb6346bb9c67b1550eb537aa183ead91e4b6eadb2f36ade02d8dd2a79fb6  nokogiri-1.19.3-arm-linux-musl.gem
71b9bd424b1b7abc18b05052a1a3cfd3627abdca62be280854cc411791357e42  nokogiri-1.19.3-arm64-darwin.gem
40ea6ebf5cf2005dae1dee26dd557d3afb41fb6de6c9764aca8cf06fdb841db1  nokogiri-1.19.3-java.gem
8bb7132cad356c879a1286eaabcb5e68326cb2490317984280fbc62f456d506a  nokogiri-1.19.3-x64-mingw-ucrt.gem
77f3fba57d46c53ab31e62fc6c28f705109d1bf6264356c76f132b2be5728d4d  nokogiri-1.19.3-x86_64-darwin.gem
2f5078620fe12e83669b5b17311b32532a8153d02eee7ad06948b926d6080976  nokogiri-1.19.3-x86_64-linux-gnu.gem
248c906d2166eca5efb56d52fdee5f9a1f51d69a72e2b64fdac647b4ce39ea3f  nokogiri-1.19.3-x86_64-linux-musl.gem
78312cbac32a40c812780d9678221b79d51288eec00054c1a8d15f7ce05960e8  nokogiri-1.19.3.gem

1.19.2

v1.19.2 / 2026-03-19

Dependencies

  • [JRuby] Saxon-HE is updated to 12.7, from 9.6.0-4. Saxon-HE is a transitive dependency of nu.validator:jing, and this update addresses CVEs in Saxon-HE's own transitive dependencies JDOM and dom4j. We don't think this warrants a security release, however we're cutting a patch release to help users whose security scanners are flagging this. [#3611] @flavorjones

SHA256 Checksums

c34d5c8208025587554608e98fd88ab125b29c80f9352b821964e9a5d5cfbd19  nokogiri-1.19.2-aarch64-linux-gnu.gem
7f6b4b0202d507326841a4f790294bf75098aef50c7173443812e3ac5cb06515  nokogiri-1.19.2-aarch64-linux-musl.gem
b7fa1139016f3dc850bda1260988f0d749934a939d04ef2da13bec060d7d5081  nokogiri-1.19.2-arm-linux-gnu.gem
61114d44f6742ff72194a1b3020967201e2eb982814778d130f6471c11f9828c  nokogiri-1.19.2-arm-linux-musl.gem
58d8ea2e31a967b843b70487a44c14c8ba1866daa1b9da9be9dbdf1b43dee205  nokogiri-1.19.2-arm64-darwin.gem
e9d67034bc80ca71043040beea8a91be5dc99b662daa38a2bfb361b7a2cc8717  nokogiri-1.19.2-java.gem
8ccf25eea3363a2c7b3f2e173a3400582c633cfead27f805df9a9c56d4852d1a  nokogiri-1.19.2-x64-mingw-ucrt.gem
7d9af11fda72dfaa2961d8c4d5380ca0b51bc389dc5f8d4b859b9644f195e7a4  nokogiri-1.19.2-x86_64-darwin.gem
fa8feca882b73e871a9845f3817a72e9734c8e974bdc4fbad6e4bc6e8076b94f  nokogiri-1.19.2-x86_64-linux-gnu.gem
93128448e61a9383a30baef041bf1f5817e22f297a1d400521e90294445069a8  nokogiri-1.19.2-x86_64-linux-musl.gem
38fdd8b59db3d5ea9e7dfb14702e882b9bf819198d5bf976f17ebce12c481756  nokogiri-1.19.2.gem

Full Changelog: v1.19.1...v1.19.2

1.19.1

v1.19.1 / 2026-02-16

Security

sha256 checksums

cfdb0eafd9a554a88f12ebcc688d2b9005f9fce42b00b970e3dc199587b27f32  nokogiri-1.19.1-aarch64-linux-gnu.gem
1e2150ab43c3b373aba76cd1190af7b9e92103564063e48c474f7600923620b5  nokogiri-1.19.1-aarch64-linux-musl.gem
0a39ed59abe3bf279fab9dd4c6db6fe8af01af0608f6e1f08b8ffa4e5d407fa3  nokogiri-1.19.1-arm-linux-gnu.gem
3a18e559ee499b064aac6562d98daab3d39ba6cbb4074a1542781b2f556db47d  nokogiri-1.19.1-arm-linux-musl.gem
dfe2d337e6700eac47290407c289d56bcf85805d128c1b5a6434ddb79731cb9e  nokogiri-1.19.1-arm64-darwin.gem
1e0bda88b1c6409f0edb9e0c25f1bf9ff4fa94c3958f492a10fcf50dda594365  nokogiri-1.19.1-java.gem
110d92ae57694ae7866670d298a5d04cd150fae5a6a7849957d66f171e6aec9b  nokogiri-1.19.1-x64-mingw-ucrt.gem
7093896778cc03efb74b85f915a775862730e887f2e58d6921e3fa3d981e68bf  nokogiri-1.19.1-x86_64-darwin.gem
1a4902842a186b4f901078e692d12257678e6133858d0566152fe29cdb98456a  nokogiri-1.19.1-x86_64-linux-gnu.gem
4267f38ad4fc7e52a2e7ee28ed494e8f9d8eb4f4b3320901d55981c7b995fc23  nokogiri-1.19.1-x86_64-linux-musl.gem
598b327f36df0b172abd57b68b18979a6e14219353bca87180c31a51a00d5ad3  nokogiri-1.19.1.gem

1.19.0

v1.19.0 / 2025-12-28

Ruby

This release is focused on changes to Ruby version support, and is otherwise functionally identical to v1.18.10.

sha256 checksums

11a97ecc3c0e7e5edcf395720b10860ef493b768f6aa80c539573530bc933767  nokogiri-1.19.0-aarch64-linux-gnu.gem
eb70507f5e01bc23dad9b8dbec2b36ad0e61d227b42d292835020ff754fb7ba9  nokogiri-1.19.0-aarch64-linux-musl.gem
572a259026b2c8b7c161fdb6469fa2d0edd2b61cd599db4bbda93289abefbfe5  nokogiri-1.19.0-arm-linux-gnu.gem
23ed90922f1a38aed555d3de4d058e90850c731c5b756d191b3dc8055948e73c  nokogiri-1.19.0-arm-linux-musl.gem
0811dfd936d5f6dd3f6d32ef790568bf29b2b7bead9ba68866847b33c9cf5810  nokogiri-1.19.0-arm64-darwin.gem
5f3a70e252be641d8a4099f7fb4cc25c81c632cb594eec9b4b8f2ca8be4374f3  nokogiri-1.19.0-java.gem
05d7ed2d95731edc9bef2811522dc396df3e476ef0d9c76793a9fca81cab056b  nokogiri-1.19.0-x64-mingw-ucrt.gem
1dad56220b603a8edb9750cd95798bffa2b8dd9dd9aa47f664009ee5b43e3067  nokogiri-1.19.0-x86_64-darwin.gem
f482b95c713d60031d48c44ce14562f8d2ce31e3a9e8dd0ccb131e9e5a68b58c  nokogiri-1.19.0-x86_64-linux-gnu.gem
1c4ca6b381622420073ce6043443af1d321e8ed93cc18b08e2666e5bd02ffae4  nokogiri-1.19.0-x86_64-linux-musl.gem
e304d21865f62518e04f2bf59f93bd3a97ca7b07e7f03952946d8e1c05f45695  nokogiri-1.19.0.gem

1.18.10

v1.18.10 / 2025-09-15

Dependencies

  • [CRuby] Vendored libxml2 is updated to v2.13.9. Note that the security fixes published in v2.13.9 were already present in Nokogiri v1.18.9.
  • [CRuby] [Windows and MacOS] Vendored libiconv is updated to v1.18

sha256 checksums

7fb87235d729c74a2be635376d82b1d459230cc17c50300f8e4fcaabc6195344  nokogiri-1.18.10-aarch64-linux-gnu.gem
7e74e58314297cc8a8f1b533f7212d1999dbe2639a9ee6d97b483ea2acc18944  nokogiri-1.18.10-aarch64-linux-musl.gem
51f4f25ab5d5ba1012d6b16aad96b840a10b067b93f35af6a55a2c104a7ee322  nokogiri-1.18.10-arm-linux-gnu.gem
1c6ea754e51cecc85c30ee8ab1e6aa4ce6b6e134d01717e9290e79374a9e00aa  nokogiri-1.18.10-arm-linux-musl.gem
c2b0de30770f50b92c9323fa34a4e1cf5a0af322afcacd239cd66ee1c1b22c85  nokogiri-1.18.10-arm64-darwin.gem
cd431a09c45d84a2f870ba0b7e8f571199b3727d530f2b4888a73639f76510b5  nokogiri-1.18.10-java.gem
64f40d4a41af9f7f83a4e236ad0cf8cca621b97e31f727b1bebdae565a653104  nokogiri-1.18.10-x64-mingw-ucrt.gem
536e74bed6db2b5076769cab5e5f5af0cd1dccbbd75f1b3e1fa69d1f5c2d79e2  nokogiri-1.18.10-x86_64-darwin.gem
ff5ba26ba2dbce5c04b9ea200777fd225061d7a3930548806f31db907e500f72  nokogiri-1.18.10-x86_64-linux-gnu.gem
0651fccf8c2ebbc2475c8b1dfd7ccac3a0a6d09f8a41b72db8c21808cb483385  nokogiri-1.18.10-x86_64-linux-musl.gem
d5cc0731008aa3b3a87b361203ea3d19b2069628cb55e46ac7d84a0445e69cc1  nokogiri-1.18.10.gem

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 70 commits:

↗️ rack (indirect, 2.2.18 β†’ 3.2.6) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Rack::Sendfile header-based X-Accel-Mapping regex injection enables unauthorized X-Accel-Redirect

Summary

Rack::Sendfile#map_accel_path interpolates the value of the X-Accel-Mapping request header directly into a regular expression when rewriting file paths for X-Accel-Redirect. Because the header value is not escaped, an attacker who can supply X-Accel-Mapping to the backend can inject regex metacharacters and control the generated X-Accel-Redirect response header.

In deployments using Rack::Sendfile with x-accel-redirect, this can allow an attacker to cause nginx to serve unintended files from configured internal locations.

Details

Rack::Sendfile#map_accel_path processes header-supplied mappings using logic equivalent to:

mapping.split(',').map(&:strip).each do |m|
  internal, external = m.split('=', 2).map(&:strip)
  new_path = path.sub(/\A#{internal}/i, external)
  return new_path unless path == new_path
end

Here, internal comes from the HTTP_X_ACCEL_MAPPING request header and is inserted directly into a regular expression without escaping. This gives the header value regex semantics rather than treating it as a literal prefix.

As a result, an attacker can supply metacharacters such as .* or capture groups to alter how the path substitution is performed. For example, a mapping such as:

X-Accel-Mapping: .*=/protected/secret.txt

causes the entire source path to match and rewrites the redirect target to a clean attacker-chosen internal path.

This differs from the documented behavior of the header-based mapping path, which is described as a simple substitution. While application-supplied mappings may intentionally support regular expressions, header-supplied mappings should be treated as literal path prefixes.

The issue is only exploitable when untrusted X-Accel-Mapping headers can reach Rack. One realistic case is a reverse proxy configuration that intends to set X-Accel-Mapping itself, but fails to do so on some routes, allowing a client-supplied header to pass through unchanged.

Impact

Applications using Rack::Sendfile with x-accel-redirect may be affected if the backend accepts attacker-controlled X-Accel-Mapping headers.

In affected deployments, an attacker may be able to control the X-Accel-Redirect response header and cause nginx to serve files from internal locations that were not intended to be reachable through the application. This can lead to unauthorized file disclosure.

The practical impact depends on deployment architecture. If the proxy always strips or overwrites X-Accel-Mapping, or if the application uses explicit configured mappings instead of the request header, exploitability may be eliminated.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that treats header-supplied X-Accel-Mapping values as literal strings rather than regular expressions.
  • Strip or overwrite inbound X-Accel-Mapping headers at the reverse proxy so client-supplied values never reach Rack.
  • Prefer explicit application-configured sendfile mappings instead of relying on request-header mappings.
  • Review proxy sub-locations and inherited header settings to ensure X-Accel-Mapping is consistently set on all backend routes.

🚨 Rack's multipart parsing without Content-Length header allows unbounded chunked file uploads

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser only wraps the request body in a BoundedIO when CONTENT_LENGTH is present. When a multipart/form-data request is sent without a Content-Length header, such as with HTTP chunked transfer encoding, multipart parsing continues until end-of-stream with no total size limit.

For file parts, the uploaded body is written directly to a temporary file on disk rather than being constrained by the buffered in-memory upload limit. An unauthenticated attacker can therefore stream an arbitrarily large multipart file upload and consume unbounded disk space.

This results in a denial of service condition for Rack applications that accept multipart form data.

Details

Rack::Multipart::Parser.parse applies BoundedIO only when content_length is not nil:

io = BoundedIO.new(io, content_length) if content_length

When CONTENT_LENGTH is absent, the parser reads the multipart body until EOF without a global byte limit.

Although Rack enforces BUFFERED_UPLOAD_BYTESIZE_LIMIT for retained non-file parts, file uploads are handled differently. When a multipart part includes a filename, the body is streamed to a Tempfile, and the retained-size accounting is not applied to that file content. As a result, file parts are not subject to the same upload size bound.

An attacker can exploit this by sending a chunked multipart/form-data request containing a file part and continuously streaming data without declaring a Content-Length. Rack will continue writing the uploaded data to disk until the client stops or the server exhausts available storage.

Impact

Any Rack application that accepts multipart/form-data uploads may be affected if no upstream component enforces a request body size limit.

An unauthenticated attacker can send a large chunked file upload to consume disk space on the application host. This may cause request failures, application instability, or broader service disruption if the host runs out of available storage.

The practical impact depends on deployment architecture. Reverse proxies or application servers that enforce upload limits may reduce or eliminate exploitability, but Rack itself does not impose a total multipart upload limit in this code path when CONTENT_LENGTH is absent.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that enforces a total multipart upload size limit even when CONTENT_LENGTH is absent.
  • Enforce request body size limits at the reverse proxy or application server.
  • Isolate temporary upload storage and monitor disk consumption for multipart endpoints.

🚨 Rack's multipart byte range processing allows denial of service via excessive overlapping ranges

Summary

Rack::Utils.get_byte_ranges parses the HTTP Range header without limiting the number of individual byte ranges. Although the existing fix for CVE-2024-26141 rejects ranges whose total byte coverage exceeds the file size, it does not restrict the count of ranges. An attacker can supply many small overlapping ranges such as 0-0,0-0,0-0,... to trigger disproportionate CPU, memory, I/O, and bandwidth consumption per request.

This results in a denial of service condition in Rack file-serving paths that process multipart byte range responses.

Details

Rack::Utils.get_byte_ranges accepts a comma-separated list of byte ranges and validates them based on their aggregate size, but does not impose a limit on how many individual ranges may be supplied.

As a result, a request such as:

Range: bytes=0-0,0-0,0-0,0-0,...

can contain thousands of overlapping one-byte ranges while still satisfying the total-size check added for CVE-2024-26141.

When such a header is processed by Rack’s file-serving code, each range causes additional work, including multipart response generation, per-range iteration, file seek and read operations, and temporary string allocation for response size calculation and output. This allows a relatively small request header to trigger disproportionately expensive processing and a much larger multipart response.

The issue is distinct from CVE-2024-26141. That fix prevents range sets whose total byte coverage exceeds the file size, but does not prevent a large number of overlapping ranges whose summed size remains within that limit.

Impact

Applications that expose file-serving paths with byte range support may be vulnerable to denial of service.

An unauthenticated attacker can send crafted Range headers containing many small overlapping ranges to consume excessive CPU time, memory, file I/O, and bandwidth. Repeated requests may reduce application availability and increase pressure on workers and garbage collection.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that limits the number of accepted byte ranges.
  • Reject or normalize multipart byte range requests containing excessive range counts.
  • Consider disabling multipart range support where it is not required.
  • Apply request filtering or header restrictions at the reverse proxy or application boundary to limit abusive Range headers.

🚨 Rack has a root directory disclosure via unescaped regex interpolation in Rack::Directory

Summary

Rack::Directory interpolates the configured root path directly into a regular expression when deriving the displayed directory path. If root contains regex metacharacters such as +, *, or ., the prefix stripping can fail and the generated directory listing may expose the full filesystem path in the HTML output.

Details

Rack::Directory::DirectoryBody#each computes the visible path using code equivalent to:

show_path = Utils.escape_html(path.sub(/\A#{root}/, ''))

Here, root is a developer-configured filesystem path. It is normalized earlier with File.expand_path(root) and then inserted directly into a regular expression without escaping.

Because the value is treated as regex syntax rather than as a literal string, metacharacters in the configured path can change how the prefix match behaves. When that happens, the expected root prefix is not removed from path, and the absolute filesystem path is rendered into the HTML directory listing.

Impact

If Rack::Directory is configured to serve a directory whose absolute path contains regex metacharacters, the generated directory listing may disclose the full server filesystem path instead of only the request-relative path.

This can expose internal deployment details such as directory layout, usernames, mount points, or naming conventions that would otherwise not be visible to clients.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack in which the root prefix is removed using an escaped regular expression.
  • Avoid using Rack::Directory with a root path that contains regular expression metacharacters.

🚨 Rack::Static prefix matching can expose unintended files under the static root

Summary

Rack::Static determines whether a request should be served as a static file using a simple string prefix check. When configured with URL prefixes such as "/css", it matches any request path that begins with that string, including unrelated paths such as "/css-config.env" or "/css-backup.sql".

As a result, files under the static root whose names merely share the configured prefix may be served unintentionally, leading to information disclosure.

Details

Rack::Static#route_file performs static-route matching using logic equivalent to:

@urls.any? { |url| path.index(url) == 0 }

This checks only whether the request path starts with the configured prefix string. It does not require a path segment boundary after the prefix.

For example, with:

use Rack::Static, urls: ["/css", "/js"], root: "public"

the following path is matched as intended:

/css/style.css

but these paths are also matched:

/css-config.env
/css-backup.sql
/csssecrets.yml

If such files exist under the configured static root, Rack forwards the request to the file server and serves them as static content.

This means a configuration intended to expose only directory trees such as /css/... and /js/... may also expose sibling files whose names begin with those same strings.

Impact

An attacker can request files under the configured static root whose names share a configured URL prefix and obtain their contents.

In affected deployments, this may expose configuration files, secrets, backups, environment files, or other unintended static content located under the same root directory.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that enforces a path boundary when matching configured static URL prefixes.
  • Match only paths that are either exactly equal to the configured prefix or begin with prefix + "/".
  • Avoid placing sensitive files under the Rack::Static root directory.
  • Prefer static URL mappings that cannot overlap with sensitive filenames.

🚨 Rack:: Static header_rules bypass via URL-encoded paths

Summary

Rack::Static#applicable_rules evaluates several header_rules types against the raw URL-encoded PATH_INFO, while the underlying file-serving path is decoded before the file is served. As a result, a request for a URL-encoded variant of a static path can serve the same file without the headers that header_rules were intended to apply.

In deployments that rely on Rack::Static to attach security-relevant response headers to static content, this can allow an attacker to bypass those headers by requesting an encoded form of the path.

Details

Rack::Static#applicable_rules matches rule types such as :fonts, Array, and Regexp directly against the incoming PATH_INFO. For example:

when :fonts
  /\.(?:ttf|otf|eot|woff2|woff|svg)\z/.match?(path)
when Array
  /\.(#{rule.join('|')})\z/.match?(path)
when Regexp
  rule.match?(path)

These checks operate on the raw request path. If the request contains encoded characters such as %2E in place of ., the rule may fail to match even though the file path is later decoded and served successfully by the static file server.

For example, both of the following requests may resolve to the same file on disk:

/fonts/test.woff
/fonts/test%2Ewoff

but only the unencoded form may receive the headers configured through header_rules.

This creates a canonicalization mismatch between the path used for header policy decisions and the path ultimately used for file serving.

Impact

Applications that rely on Rack::Static header_rules to apply security-relevant headers to static files may be affected.

In affected deployments, an attacker can request an encoded variant of a static file path and receive the same file without the intended headers. Depending on how header_rules are used, this may bypass protections such as clickjacking defenses, content restrictions, or other response policies applied to static content.

The practical impact depends on the configured rules and the types of files being served. If header_rules are only used for non-security purposes such as caching, the issue may have limited security significance.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that applies header_rules to a decoded path consistently with static file resolution.
  • Do not rely solely on Rack::Static header_rules for security-critical headers where encoded path variants may reach the application.
  • Prefer setting security headers at the reverse proxy or web server layer so they apply consistently to both encoded and unencoded path forms.
  • Normalize or reject encoded path variants for static content at the edge, where feasible.

🚨 Rack has quadratic complexity in Rack::Utils.select_best_encoding via wildcard Accept-Encoding header

Summary

Rack::Utils.select_best_encoding processes Accept-Encoding values with quadratic time complexity when the header contains many wildcard (*) entries. Because this method is used by Rack::Deflater to choose a response encoding, an unauthenticated attacker can send a single request with a crafted Accept-Encoding header and cause disproportionate CPU consumption on the compression middleware path.

This results in a denial of service condition for applications using Rack::Deflater.

Details

Rack::Utils.select_best_encoding expands parsed Accept-Encoding values into a list of candidate encodings. When an entry is *, the method computes the set of concrete encodings by subtracting the encodings already present in the request:

if m == "*"
  (available_encodings - accept_encoding.map(&:first)).each do |m2|
    expanded_accept_encoding << [m2, q, preference]
  end
else
  expanded_accept_encoding << [m, q, preference]
end

Because accept_encoding.map(&:first) is evaluated inside the loop, it is recomputed for each wildcard entry. If the request contains N wildcard entries, this produces repeated scans over the full parsed header and causes quadratic behavior.

After expansion, the method also performs additional work over expanded_accept_encoding, including per-entry deletion, which further increases the cost for large inputs.

Rack::Deflater invokes this method for each request when the middleware is enabled:

Utils.select_best_encoding(ENCODINGS, Utils.parse_encodings(accept_encoding))

As a result, a client can trigger this expensive code path simply by sending a large Accept-Encoding header containing many repeated wildcard values.

For example, a request with an approximately 8 KB Accept-Encoding header containing about 1,000 *;q=0.5 entries can cause roughly 170 ms of CPU time in a single request on the Rack::Deflater path, compared to a negligible baseline for a normal header.

This issue is distinct from CVE-2024-26146. That issue concerned regular expression denial of service during Accept header parsing, whereas this issue arises later during encoding selection after the header has already been parsed.

Impact

Any Rack application using Rack::Deflater may be affected.

An unauthenticated attacker can send requests with crafted Accept-Encoding headers to trigger excessive CPU usage in the encoding selection logic. Repeated requests can consume worker time disproportionately and reduce application availability.

The attack does not require invalid HTTP syntax or large payload bodies. A single header-sized request is sufficient to reach the vulnerable code path.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack in which encoding selection does not repeatedly rescan the parsed header for wildcard entries.
  • Avoid enabling Rack::Deflater on untrusted traffic.
  • Apply request filtering or header size / format restrictions at the reverse proxy or application boundary to limit abusive Accept-Encoding values.

🚨 Rack: Forwarded Header semicolon injection enables Host and Scheme spoofing

Summary

Rack::Utils.forwarded_values parses the RFC 7239 Forwarded header by splitting on semicolons before handling quoted-string values. Because quoted values may legally contain semicolons, a header such as:

Forwarded: for="127.0.0.1;host=evil.com;proto=https"

can be interpreted by Rack as multiple Forwarded directives rather than as a single quoted for value.

In deployments where an upstream proxy, WAF, or intermediary validates or preserves quoted Forwarded values differently, this discrepancy can allow an attacker to smuggle host, proto, for, or by parameters through a single header value.

Details

Rack::Utils.forwarded_values processes the header using logic equivalent to:

forwarded_header.split(';').each_with_object({}) do |field, values|
  field.split(',').each do |pair|
    pair = pair.split('=').map(&:strip).join('=')
    return nil unless pair =~ /\A(by|for|host|proto)="?([^"]+)"?\Z/i
    (values[$1.downcase.to_sym] ||= []) << $2
  end
end

The method splits on ; before it parses individual name=value pairs. This is inconsistent with RFC 7239, which permits quoted-string values, and quoted strings may contain semicolons as literal content.

As a result, a header value such as:

Forwarded: for="127.0.0.1;host=evil.com;proto=https"

is not treated as a single for value. Instead, Rack may interpret it as if the client had supplied separate for, host, and proto directives.

This creates an interpretation conflict when another component in front of Rack treats the quoted value as valid literal content, while Rack reparses it as multiple forwarding parameters.

Impact

Applications that rely on Forwarded to derive request metadata may observe attacker-controlled values for host, proto, for, or related URL components.

In affected deployments, this can lead to host or scheme spoofing in derived values such as req.host, req.scheme, req.base_url, or req.url. Applications that use those values for password reset links, redirects, absolute URL generation, logging, IP-based decisions, or backend requests may be vulnerable to downstream security impact.

The practical security impact depends on deployment architecture. If clients can already supply arbitrary trusted Forwarded parameters directly, this bug may not add meaningful attacker capability. The issue is most relevant where an upstream component and Rack interpret the same Forwarded header differently.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that parses Forwarded quoted-string values before splitting on parameter delimiters.
  • Avoid trusting client-supplied Forwarded headers unless they are normalized or regenerated by a trusted reverse proxy.
  • Prefer stripping inbound Forwarded headers at the edge and reconstructing them from trusted proxy metadata.
  • Avoid using req.host, req.scheme, req.base_url, or req.url for security-sensitive operations unless the forwarding chain is explicitly trusted and validated.

🚨 Rack's improper unfolding of folded multipart headers preserves CRLF in parsed parameter values

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser unfolds folded multipart part headers incorrectly. When a multipart header contains an obs-fold sequence, Rack preserves the embedded CRLF in parsed parameter values such as filename or name instead of removing the folded line break during unfolding.

As a result, applications that later reuse those parsed values in HTTP response headers may be vulnerable to downstream header injection or response splitting.

Details

Rack::Multipart::Parser accepts folded multipart header values and unfolds them during parsing. However, the unfolding behavior does not fully remove the embedded line break sequence from the parsed value.

This means a multipart part header such as:

Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file"; filename="test\r\n foo.txt"

can result in a parsed parameter value that still contains CRLF characters.

The issue is not that Rack creates a second multipart header field. Rather, the problem is that CRLF remains embedded in the parsed metadata value after unfolding. If an application later uses that value in a security-sensitive context, such as constructing an HTTP response header, the preserved CRLF may alter downstream header parsing.

Affected values may include multipart parameters such as filename, name, or similar parsed header attributes.

Impact

Applications that accept multipart form uploads may be affected if they later reuse parsed multipart metadata in HTTP headers or other header-sensitive contexts.

In affected deployments, an attacker may be able to supply a multipart parameter value containing folded line breaks and cause downstream header injection, response splitting, cache poisoning, or related response parsing issues.

The practical impact depends on application behavior. If parsed multipart metadata is not reused in HTTP headers, the issue may be limited to incorrect parsing behavior rather than a direct exploit path.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that removes CRLF correctly when unfolding folded multipart header values.
  • Avoid copying upload metadata such as filename directly into HTTP response headers without sanitization.
  • Sanitize or reject carriage return and line feed characters in multipart-derived values before reusing them in response headers, logs, or downstream protocol contexts.
  • Where feasible, normalize uploaded filenames before storing or reflecting them.

🚨 Rack's greedy multipart boundary parsing can cause parser differentials and WAF bypass.

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser extracts the boundary parameter from multipart/form-data using a greedy regular expression. When a Content-Type header contains multiple boundary parameters, Rack selects the last one rather than the first.

In deployments where an upstream proxy, WAF, or intermediary interprets the first boundary parameter, this mismatch can allow an attacker to smuggle multipart content past upstream inspection and have Rack parse a different body structure than the intermediary validated.

Details

Rack identifies the multipart boundary using logic equivalent to:

MULTIPART = %r|\Amultipart/.*boundary=\"?([^\";,]+)\"?|ni

Because the expression is greedy, it matches the last boundary= parameter in a header such as:

Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=safe; boundary=malicious

As a result, Rack parses the request body using malicious, while another component may interpret the same header using safe.

This creates an interpretation conflict. If an upstream WAF or proxy inspects multipart parts using the first boundary and Rack later parses the body using the last boundary, a client may be able to place malicious form fields or uploaded content in parts that Rack accepts but the upstream component did not inspect as intended.

This issue is most relevant in layered deployments where security decisions are made before the request reaches Rack.

Impact

Applications that accept multipart/form-data uploads behind an inspecting proxy or WAF may be affected.

In such deployments, an attacker may be able to bypass upstream filtering of uploaded files or form fields by sending a request with multiple boundary parameters and relying on the intermediary and Rack to parse the request differently.

The practical impact depends on deployment architecture. If no upstream component relies on a different multipart interpretation, this behavior may not provide meaningful additional attacker capability.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that rejects ambiguous multipart Content-Type headers or parses duplicate boundary parameters consistently.
  • Reject requests containing multiple boundary parameters.
  • Normalize or regenerate multipart metadata at the trusted edge before forwarding requests to Rack.
  • Avoid relying on upstream inspection of malformed multipart requests unless duplicate parameter handling is explicitly consistent across components.

🚨 Rack's multipart header parsing allows Denial of Service via escape-heavy quoted parameters

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser#handle_mime_head parses quoted multipart parameters such as Content-Disposition: form-data; name="..." using repeated String#index searches combined with String#slice! prefix deletion. For escape-heavy quoted values, this causes super-linear processing.

An unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted multipart/form-data request containing many parts with long backslash-escaped parameter values to trigger excessive CPU usage during multipart parsing.

This results in a denial of service condition in Rack applications that accept multipart form data.

Details

Rack::Multipart::Parser#handle_mime_head parses quoted parameter values by repeatedly:

  1. Searching for the next quote or backslash,
  2. Copying the preceding substring into a new buffer, and
  3. Removing the processed prefix from the original string with slice!.

An attacker can exploit this by sending a multipart request with many parts whose name parameters contain long escape-heavy values such as:

name="a\\a\\a\\a\\a\\..."

Under default Rack limits, a request can contain up to 4095 parts. If many of those parts use long quoted values with dense escape characters, the parser performs disproportionately expensive CPU work while remaining within normal request size and part-count limits.

Impact

Any Rack application that accepts multipart/form-data requests may be affected, including file upload endpoints and standard HTML form handlers.

An unauthenticated attacker can send crafted multipart requests that consume excessive CPU time during request parsing. Repeated requests can tie up application workers, reduce throughput, and degrade or deny service availability.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that parses quoted multipart parameters without repeated rescanning and destructive prefix deletion.
  • Apply request throttling or rate limiting to multipart upload endpoints.
  • Where operationally feasible, restrict or isolate multipart parsing on untrusted high-volume endpoints.

🚨 Rack's multipart byte range processing allows denial of service via excessive overlapping ranges

Summary

Rack::Utils.get_byte_ranges parses the HTTP Range header without limiting the number of individual byte ranges. Although the existing fix for CVE-2024-26141 rejects ranges whose total byte coverage exceeds the file size, it does not restrict the count of ranges. An attacker can supply many small overlapping ranges such as 0-0,0-0,0-0,... to trigger disproportionate CPU, memory, I/O, and bandwidth consumption per request.

This results in a denial of service condition in Rack file-serving paths that process multipart byte range responses.

Details

Rack::Utils.get_byte_ranges accepts a comma-separated list of byte ranges and validates them based on their aggregate size, but does not impose a limit on how many individual ranges may be supplied.

As a result, a request such as:

Range: bytes=0-0,0-0,0-0,0-0,...

can contain thousands of overlapping one-byte ranges while still satisfying the total-size check added for CVE-2024-26141.

When such a header is processed by Rack’s file-serving code, each range causes additional work, including multipart response generation, per-range iteration, file seek and read operations, and temporary string allocation for response size calculation and output. This allows a relatively small request header to trigger disproportionately expensive processing and a much larger multipart response.

The issue is distinct from CVE-2024-26141. That fix prevents range sets whose total byte coverage exceeds the file size, but does not prevent a large number of overlapping ranges whose summed size remains within that limit.

Impact

Applications that expose file-serving paths with byte range support may be vulnerable to denial of service.

An unauthenticated attacker can send crafted Range headers containing many small overlapping ranges to consume excessive CPU time, memory, file I/O, and bandwidth. Repeated requests may reduce application availability and increase pressure on workers and garbage collection.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that limits the number of accepted byte ranges.
  • Reject or normalize multipart byte range requests containing excessive range counts.
  • Consider disabling multipart range support where it is not required.
  • Apply request filtering or header restrictions at the reverse proxy or application boundary to limit abusive Range headers.

🚨 Rack:: Static header_rules bypass via URL-encoded paths

Summary

Rack::Static#applicable_rules evaluates several header_rules types against the raw URL-encoded PATH_INFO, while the underlying file-serving path is decoded before the file is served. As a result, a request for a URL-encoded variant of a static path can serve the same file without the headers that header_rules were intended to apply.

In deployments that rely on Rack::Static to attach security-relevant response headers to static content, this can allow an attacker to bypass those headers by requesting an encoded form of the path.

Details

Rack::Static#applicable_rules matches rule types such as :fonts, Array, and Regexp directly against the incoming PATH_INFO. For example:

when :fonts
  /\.(?:ttf|otf|eot|woff2|woff|svg)\z/.match?(path)
when Array
  /\.(#{rule.join('|')})\z/.match?(path)
when Regexp
  rule.match?(path)

These checks operate on the raw request path. If the request contains encoded characters such as %2E in place of ., the rule may fail to match even though the file path is later decoded and served successfully by the static file server.

For example, both of the following requests may resolve to the same file on disk:

/fonts/test.woff
/fonts/test%2Ewoff

but only the unencoded form may receive the headers configured through header_rules.

This creates a canonicalization mismatch between the path used for header policy decisions and the path ultimately used for file serving.

Impact

Applications that rely on Rack::Static header_rules to apply security-relevant headers to static files may be affected.

In affected deployments, an attacker can request an encoded variant of a static file path and receive the same file without the intended headers. Depending on how header_rules are used, this may bypass protections such as clickjacking defenses, content restrictions, or other response policies applied to static content.

The practical impact depends on the configured rules and the types of files being served. If header_rules are only used for non-security purposes such as caching, the issue may have limited security significance.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that applies header_rules to a decoded path consistently with static file resolution.
  • Do not rely solely on Rack::Static header_rules for security-critical headers where encoded path variants may reach the application.
  • Prefer setting security headers at the reverse proxy or web server layer so they apply consistently to both encoded and unencoded path forms.
  • Normalize or reject encoded path variants for static content at the edge, where feasible.

🚨 Rack::Static prefix matching can expose unintended files under the static root

Summary

Rack::Static determines whether a request should be served as a static file using a simple string prefix check. When configured with URL prefixes such as "/css", it matches any request path that begins with that string, including unrelated paths such as "/css-config.env" or "/css-backup.sql".

As a result, files under the static root whose names merely share the configured prefix may be served unintentionally, leading to information disclosure.

Details

Rack::Static#route_file performs static-route matching using logic equivalent to:

@urls.any? { |url| path.index(url) == 0 }

This checks only whether the request path starts with the configured prefix string. It does not require a path segment boundary after the prefix.

For example, with:

use Rack::Static, urls: ["/css", "/js"], root: "public"

the following path is matched as intended:

/css/style.css

but these paths are also matched:

/css-config.env
/css-backup.sql
/csssecrets.yml

If such files exist under the configured static root, Rack forwards the request to the file server and serves them as static content.

This means a configuration intended to expose only directory trees such as /css/... and /js/... may also expose sibling files whose names begin with those same strings.

Impact

An attacker can request files under the configured static root whose names share a configured URL prefix and obtain their contents.

In affected deployments, this may expose configuration files, secrets, backups, environment files, or other unintended static content located under the same root directory.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that enforces a path boundary when matching configured static URL prefixes.
  • Match only paths that are either exactly equal to the configured prefix or begin with prefix + "/".
  • Avoid placing sensitive files under the Rack::Static root directory.
  • Prefer static URL mappings that cannot overlap with sensitive filenames.

🚨 Rack::Request accepts invalid Host characters, enabling host allowlist bypass

Summary

Rack::Request parses the Host header using an AUTHORITY regular expression that accepts characters not permitted in RFC-compliant hostnames, including /, ?, #, and @. Because req.host returns the full parsed value, applications that validate hosts using naive prefix or suffix checks can be bypassed.

For example, a check such as req.host.start_with?("myapp.com") can be bypassed with Host: myapp.com@evil.com, and a check such as req.host.end_with?("myapp.com") can be bypassed with Host: evil.com/myapp.com.

This can lead to host header poisoning in applications that use req.host, req.url, or req.base_url for link generation, redirects, or origin validation.

Details

Rack::Request parses the authority component using logic equivalent to:

AUTHORITY = /
  \A
  (?<host>
    \[(?<address>#{ipv6})\]
    |
    (?<address>[[[:graph:]&&[^\[\]]]]*?)
  )
  (:(?<port>\d+))?
  \z
/x

The character class used for non-IPv6 hosts accepts nearly all printable characters except [ and ]. This includes reserved URI delimiters such as @, /, ?, and #, which are not valid hostname characters under RFC 3986 host syntax.

As a result, values such as the following are accepted and returned through req.host:

myapp.com@evil.com
evil.com/myapp.com
evil.com#myapp.com

Applications that attempt to allowlist hosts using string prefix or suffix checks may therefore treat attacker-controlled hosts as trusted. For example:

req.host.start_with?("myapp.com")

accepts:

myapp.com@evil.com

and:

req.host.end_with?("myapp.com")

accepts:

evil.com/myapp.com

When those values are later used to build absolute URLs or enforce origin restrictions, the application may produce attacker-controlled results.

Impact

Applications that rely on req.host, req.url, or req.base_url may be affected if they perform naive host validation or assume Rack only returns RFC-valid hostnames.

In affected deployments, an attacker may be able to bypass host allowlists and poison generated links, redirects, or origin-dependent security decisions. This can enable attacks such as password reset link poisoning or other host header injection issues.

The practical impact depends on application behavior. If the application or reverse proxy already enforces strict host validation, exploitability may be reduced or eliminated.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that rejects invalid authority characters in Host.
  • Enforce strict Host header validation at the reverse proxy or load balancer.
  • Do not rely on prefix or suffix string checks such as start_with? or end_with? for host allowlisting.
  • Use exact host allowlists, or exact subdomain boundary checks, after validating that the host is syntactically valid.

🚨 Rack has Content-Length mismatch in Rack::Files error responses

Summary

Rack::Files#fail sets the Content-Length response header using String#size instead of String#bytesize. When the response body contains multibyte UTF-8 characters, the declared Content-Length is smaller than the number of bytes actually sent on the wire.

Because Rack::Files reflects the requested path in 404 responses, an attacker can trigger this mismatch by requesting a non-existent path containing percent-encoded UTF-8 characters.

This results in incorrect HTTP response framing and may cause response desynchronization in deployments that rely on the incorrect Content-Length value.

Details

Rack::Files#fail constructs error responses using logic equivalent to:

def fail(status, body, headers = {})
  body += "\n"
  [
    status,
    {
      "content-type" => "text/plain",
      "content-length" => body.size.to_s,
      "x-cascade" => "pass"
    }.merge!(headers),
    [body]
  ]
end

Here, body.size returns the number of characters, not the number of bytes. For multibyte UTF-8 strings, this produces an incorrect Content-Length value.

Rack::Files includes the decoded request path in 404 responses. A request containing percent-encoded UTF-8 path components therefore causes the response body to contain multibyte characters, while the Content-Length header still reflects character count rather than byte count.

As a result, the server can send more bytes than declared in the response headers.

This violates HTTP message framing requirements, which define Content-Length as the number of octets in the message body.

Impact

Applications using Rack::Files may emit incorrectly framed error responses when handling requests for non-existent paths containing multibyte characters.

In some deployment topologies, particularly with keep-alive connections and intermediaries that rely on Content-Length, this mismatch may lead to response parsing inconsistencies or response desynchronization. The practical exploitability depends on the behavior of downstream proxies, clients, and connection reuse.

Even where no secondary exploitation is possible, the response is malformed and may trigger protocol errors in strict components.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that computes Content-Length using String#bytesize.
  • Avoid exposing Rack::Files directly to untrusted traffic until a fix is available, if operationally feasible.
  • Where possible, place Rack behind a proxy or server that normalizes or rejects malformed backend responses.
  • Prefer closing backend connections on error paths if response framing anomalies are a concern.

🚨 Rack::Sendfile header-based X-Accel-Mapping regex injection enables unauthorized X-Accel-Redirect

Summary

Rack::Sendfile#map_accel_path interpolates the value of the X-Accel-Mapping request header directly into a regular expression when rewriting file paths for X-Accel-Redirect. Because the header value is not escaped, an attacker who can supply X-Accel-Mapping to the backend can inject regex metacharacters and control the generated X-Accel-Redirect response header.

In deployments using Rack::Sendfile with x-accel-redirect, this can allow an attacker to cause nginx to serve unintended files from configured internal locations.

Details

Rack::Sendfile#map_accel_path processes header-supplied mappings using logic equivalent to:

mapping.split(',').map(&:strip).each do |m|
  internal, external = m.split('=', 2).map(&:strip)
  new_path = path.sub(/\A#{internal}/i, external)
  return new_path unless path == new_path
end

Here, internal comes from the HTTP_X_ACCEL_MAPPING request header and is inserted directly into a regular expression without escaping. This gives the header value regex semantics rather than treating it as a literal prefix.

As a result, an attacker can supply metacharacters such as .* or capture groups to alter how the path substitution is performed. For example, a mapping such as:

X-Accel-Mapping: .*=/protected/secret.txt

causes the entire source path to match and rewrites the redirect target to a clean attacker-chosen internal path.

This differs from the documented behavior of the header-based mapping path, which is described as a simple substitution. While application-supplied mappings may intentionally support regular expressions, header-supplied mappings should be treated as literal path prefixes.

The issue is only exploitable when untrusted X-Accel-Mapping headers can reach Rack. One realistic case is a reverse proxy configuration that intends to set X-Accel-Mapping itself, but fails to do so on some routes, allowing a client-supplied header to pass through unchanged.

Impact

Applications using Rack::Sendfile with x-accel-redirect may be affected if the backend accepts attacker-controlled X-Accel-Mapping headers.

In affected deployments, an attacker may be able to control the X-Accel-Redirect response header and cause nginx to serve files from internal locations that were not intended to be reachable through the application. This can lead to unauthorized file disclosure.

The practical impact depends on deployment architecture. If the proxy always strips or overwrites X-Accel-Mapping, or if the application uses explicit configured mappings instead of the request header, exploitability may be eliminated.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that treats header-supplied X-Accel-Mapping values as literal strings rather than regular expressions.
  • Strip or overwrite inbound X-Accel-Mapping headers at the reverse proxy so client-supplied values never reach Rack.
  • Prefer explicit application-configured sendfile mappings instead of relying on request-header mappings.
  • Review proxy sub-locations and inherited header settings to ensure X-Accel-Mapping is consistently set on all backend routes.

🚨 Rack's multipart parsing without Content-Length header allows unbounded chunked file uploads

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser only wraps the request body in a BoundedIO when CONTENT_LENGTH is present. When a multipart/form-data request is sent without a Content-Length header, such as with HTTP chunked transfer encoding, multipart parsing continues until end-of-stream with no total size limit.

For file parts, the uploaded body is written directly to a temporary file on disk rather than being constrained by the buffered in-memory upload limit. An unauthenticated attacker can therefore stream an arbitrarily large multipart file upload and consume unbounded disk space.

This results in a denial of service condition for Rack applications that accept multipart form data.

Details

Rack::Multipart::Parser.parse applies BoundedIO only when content_length is not nil:

io = BoundedIO.new(io, content_length) if content_length

When CONTENT_LENGTH is absent, the parser reads the multipart body until EOF without a global byte limit.

Although Rack enforces BUFFERED_UPLOAD_BYTESIZE_LIMIT for retained non-file parts, file uploads are handled differently. When a multipart part includes a filename, the body is streamed to a Tempfile, and the retained-size accounting is not applied to that file content. As a result, file parts are not subject to the same upload size bound.

An attacker can exploit this by sending a chunked multipart/form-data request containing a file part and continuously streaming data without declaring a Content-Length. Rack will continue writing the uploaded data to disk until the client stops or the server exhausts available storage.

Impact

Any Rack application that accepts multipart/form-data uploads may be affected if no upstream component enforces a request body size limit.

An unauthenticated attacker can send a large chunked file upload to consume disk space on the application host. This may cause request failures, application instability, or broader service disruption if the host runs out of available storage.

The practical impact depends on deployment architecture. Reverse proxies or application servers that enforce upload limits may reduce or eliminate exploitability, but Rack itself does not impose a total multipart upload limit in this code path when CONTENT_LENGTH is absent.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that enforces a total multipart upload size limit even when CONTENT_LENGTH is absent.
  • Enforce request body size limits at the reverse proxy or application server.
  • Isolate temporary upload storage and monitor disk consumption for multipart endpoints.

🚨 Rack has a root directory disclosure via unescaped regex interpolation in Rack::Directory

Summary

Rack::Directory interpolates the configured root path directly into a regular expression when deriving the displayed directory path. If root contains regex metacharacters such as +, *, or ., the prefix stripping can fail and the generated directory listing may expose the full filesystem path in the HTML output.

Details

Rack::Directory::DirectoryBody#each computes the visible path using code equivalent to:

show_path = Utils.escape_html(path.sub(/\A#{root}/, ''))

Here, root is a developer-configured filesystem path. It is normalized earlier with File.expand_path(root) and then inserted directly into a regular expression without escaping.

Because the value is treated as regex syntax rather than as a literal string, metacharacters in the configured path can change how the prefix match behaves. When that happens, the expected root prefix is not removed from path, and the absolute filesystem path is rendered into the HTML directory listing.

Impact

If Rack::Directory is configured to serve a directory whose absolute path contains regex metacharacters, the generated directory listing may disclose the full server filesystem path instead of only the request-relative path.

This can expose internal deployment details such as directory layout, usernames, mount points, or naming conventions that would otherwise not be visible to clients.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack in which the root prefix is removed using an escaped regular expression.
  • Avoid using Rack::Directory with a root path that contains regular expression metacharacters.

🚨 Rack has quadratic complexity in Rack::Utils.select_best_encoding via wildcard Accept-Encoding header

Summary

Rack::Utils.select_best_encoding processes Accept-Encoding values with quadratic time complexity when the header contains many wildcard (*) entries. Because this method is used by Rack::Deflater to choose a response encoding, an unauthenticated attacker can send a single request with a crafted Accept-Encoding header and cause disproportionate CPU consumption on the compression middleware path.

This results in a denial of service condition for applications using Rack::Deflater.

Details

Rack::Utils.select_best_encoding expands parsed Accept-Encoding values into a list of candidate encodings. When an entry is *, the method computes the set of concrete encodings by subtracting the encodings already present in the request:

if m == "*"
  (available_encodings - accept_encoding.map(&:first)).each do |m2|
    expanded_accept_encoding << [m2, q, preference]
  end
else
  expanded_accept_encoding << [m, q, preference]
end

Because accept_encoding.map(&:first) is evaluated inside the loop, it is recomputed for each wildcard entry. If the request contains N wildcard entries, this produces repeated scans over the full parsed header and causes quadratic behavior.

After expansion, the method also performs additional work over expanded_accept_encoding, including per-entry deletion, which further increases the cost for large inputs.

Rack::Deflater invokes this method for each request when the middleware is enabled:

Utils.select_best_encoding(ENCODINGS, Utils.parse_encodings(accept_encoding))

As a result, a client can trigger this expensive code path simply by sending a large Accept-Encoding header containing many repeated wildcard values.

For example, a request with an approximately 8 KB Accept-Encoding header containing about 1,000 *;q=0.5 entries can cause roughly 170 ms of CPU time in a single request on the Rack::Deflater path, compared to a negligible baseline for a normal header.

This issue is distinct from CVE-2024-26146. That issue concerned regular expression denial of service during Accept header parsing, whereas this issue arises later during encoding selection after the header has already been parsed.

Impact

Any Rack application using Rack::Deflater may be affected.

An unauthenticated attacker can send requests with crafted Accept-Encoding headers to trigger excessive CPU usage in the encoding selection logic. Repeated requests can consume worker time disproportionately and reduce application availability.

The attack does not require invalid HTTP syntax or large payload bodies. A single header-sized request is sufficient to reach the vulnerable code path.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack in which encoding selection does not repeatedly rescan the parsed header for wildcard entries.
  • Avoid enabling Rack::Deflater on untrusted traffic.
  • Apply request filtering or header size / format restrictions at the reverse proxy or application boundary to limit abusive Accept-Encoding values.

🚨 Rack: Forwarded Header semicolon injection enables Host and Scheme spoofing

Summary

Rack::Utils.forwarded_values parses the RFC 7239 Forwarded header by splitting on semicolons before handling quoted-string values. Because quoted values may legally contain semicolons, a header such as:

Forwarded: for="127.0.0.1;host=evil.com;proto=https"

can be interpreted by Rack as multiple Forwarded directives rather than as a single quoted for value.

In deployments where an upstream proxy, WAF, or intermediary validates or preserves quoted Forwarded values differently, this discrepancy can allow an attacker to smuggle host, proto, for, or by parameters through a single header value.

Details

Rack::Utils.forwarded_values processes the header using logic equivalent to:

forwarded_header.split(';').each_with_object({}) do |field, values|
  field.split(',').each do |pair|
    pair = pair.split('=').map(&:strip).join('=')
    return nil unless pair =~ /\A(by|for|host|proto)="?([^"]+)"?\Z/i
    (values[$1.downcase.to_sym] ||= []) << $2
  end
end

The method splits on ; before it parses individual name=value pairs. This is inconsistent with RFC 7239, which permits quoted-string values, and quoted strings may contain semicolons as literal content.

As a result, a header value such as:

Forwarded: for="127.0.0.1;host=evil.com;proto=https"

is not treated as a single for value. Instead, Rack may interpret it as if the client had supplied separate for, host, and proto directives.

This creates an interpretation conflict when another component in front of Rack treats the quoted value as valid literal content, while Rack reparses it as multiple forwarding parameters.

Impact

Applications that rely on Forwarded to derive request metadata may observe attacker-controlled values for host, proto, for, or related URL components.

In affected deployments, this can lead to host or scheme spoofing in derived values such as req.host, req.scheme, req.base_url, or req.url. Applications that use those values for password reset links, redirects, absolute URL generation, logging, IP-based decisions, or backend requests may be vulnerable to downstream security impact.

The practical security impact depends on deployment architecture. If clients can already supply arbitrary trusted Forwarded parameters directly, this bug may not add meaningful attacker capability. The issue is most relevant where an upstream component and Rack interpret the same Forwarded header differently.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that parses Forwarded quoted-string values before splitting on parameter delimiters.
  • Avoid trusting client-supplied Forwarded headers unless they are normalized or regenerated by a trusted reverse proxy.
  • Prefer stripping inbound Forwarded headers at the edge and reconstructing them from trusted proxy metadata.
  • Avoid using req.host, req.scheme, req.base_url, or req.url for security-sensitive operations unless the forwarding chain is explicitly trusted and validated.

🚨 Rack's greedy multipart boundary parsing can cause parser differentials and WAF bypass.

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser extracts the boundary parameter from multipart/form-data using a greedy regular expression. When a Content-Type header contains multiple boundary parameters, Rack selects the last one rather than the first.

In deployments where an upstream proxy, WAF, or intermediary interprets the first boundary parameter, this mismatch can allow an attacker to smuggle multipart content past upstream inspection and have Rack parse a different body structure than the intermediary validated.

Details

Rack identifies the multipart boundary using logic equivalent to:

MULTIPART = %r|\Amultipart/.*boundary=\"?([^\";,]+)\"?|ni

Because the expression is greedy, it matches the last boundary= parameter in a header such as:

Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=safe; boundary=malicious

As a result, Rack parses the request body using malicious, while another component may interpret the same header using safe.

This creates an interpretation conflict. If an upstream WAF or proxy inspects multipart parts using the first boundary and Rack later parses the body using the last boundary, a client may be able to place malicious form fields or uploaded content in parts that Rack accepts but the upstream component did not inspect as intended.

This issue is most relevant in layered deployments where security decisions are made before the request reaches Rack.

Impact

Applications that accept multipart/form-data uploads behind an inspecting proxy or WAF may be affected.

In such deployments, an attacker may be able to bypass upstream filtering of uploaded files or form fields by sending a request with multiple boundary parameters and relying on the intermediary and Rack to parse the request differently.

The practical impact depends on deployment architecture. If no upstream component relies on a different multipart interpretation, this behavior may not provide meaningful additional attacker capability.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that rejects ambiguous multipart Content-Type headers or parses duplicate boundary parameters consistently.
  • Reject requests containing multiple boundary parameters.
  • Normalize or regenerate multipart metadata at the trusted edge before forwarding requests to Rack.
  • Avoid relying on upstream inspection of malformed multipart requests unless duplicate parameter handling is explicitly consistent across components.

🚨 Rack's multipart header parsing allows Denial of Service via escape-heavy quoted parameters

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser#handle_mime_head parses quoted multipart parameters such as Content-Disposition: form-data; name="..." using repeated String#index searches combined with String#slice! prefix deletion. For escape-heavy quoted values, this causes super-linear processing.

An unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted multipart/form-data request containing many parts with long backslash-escaped parameter values to trigger excessive CPU usage during multipart parsing.

This results in a denial of service condition in Rack applications that accept multipart form data.

Details

Rack::Multipart::Parser#handle_mime_head parses quoted parameter values by repeatedly:

  1. Searching for the next quote or backslash,
  2. Copying the preceding substring into a new buffer, and
  3. Removing the processed prefix from the original string with slice!.

An attacker can exploit this by sending a multipart request with many parts whose name parameters contain long escape-heavy values such as:

name="a\\a\\a\\a\\a\\..."

Under default Rack limits, a request can contain up to 4095 parts. If many of those parts use long quoted values with dense escape characters, the parser performs disproportionately expensive CPU work while remaining within normal request size and part-count limits.

Impact

Any Rack application that accepts multipart/form-data requests may be affected, including file upload endpoints and standard HTML form handlers.

An unauthenticated attacker can send crafted multipart requests that consume excessive CPU time during request parsing. Repeated requests can tie up application workers, reduce throughput, and degrade or deny service availability.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that parses quoted multipart parameters without repeated rescanning and destructive prefix deletion.
  • Apply request throttling or rate limiting to multipart upload endpoints.
  • Where operationally feasible, restrict or isolate multipart parsing on untrusted high-volume endpoints.

🚨 Rack's multipart byte range processing allows denial of service via excessive overlapping ranges

Summary

Rack::Utils.get_byte_ranges parses the HTTP Range header without limiting the number of individual byte ranges. Although the existing fix for CVE-2024-26141 rejects ranges whose total byte coverage exceeds the file size, it does not restrict the count of ranges. An attacker can supply many small overlapping ranges such as 0-0,0-0,0-0,... to trigger disproportionate CPU, memory, I/O, and bandwidth consumption per request.

This results in a denial of service condition in Rack file-serving paths that process multipart byte range responses.

Details

Rack::Utils.get_byte_ranges accepts a comma-separated list of byte ranges and validates them based on their aggregate size, but does not impose a limit on how many individual ranges may be supplied.

As a result, a request such as:

Range: bytes=0-0,0-0,0-0,0-0,...

can contain thousands of overlapping one-byte ranges while still satisfying the total-size check added for CVE-2024-26141.

When such a header is processed by Rack’s file-serving code, each range causes additional work, including multipart response generation, per-range iteration, file seek and read operations, and temporary string allocation for response size calculation and output. This allows a relatively small request header to trigger disproportionately expensive processing and a much larger multipart response.

The issue is distinct from CVE-2024-26141. That fix prevents range sets whose total byte coverage exceeds the file size, but does not prevent a large number of overlapping ranges whose summed size remains within that limit.

Impact

Applications that expose file-serving paths with byte range support may be vulnerable to denial of service.

An unauthenticated attacker can send crafted Range headers containing many small overlapping ranges to consume excessive CPU time, memory, file I/O, and bandwidth. Repeated requests may reduce application availability and increase pressure on workers and garbage collection.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that limits the number of accepted byte ranges.
  • Reject or normalize multipart byte range requests containing excessive range counts.
  • Consider disabling multipart range support where it is not required.
  • Apply request filtering or header restrictions at the reverse proxy or application boundary to limit abusive Range headers.

🚨 Rack:: Static header_rules bypass via URL-encoded paths

Summary

Rack::Static#applicable_rules evaluates several header_rules types against the raw URL-encoded PATH_INFO, while the underlying file-serving path is decoded before the file is served. As a result, a request for a URL-encoded variant of a static path can serve the same file without the headers that header_rules were intended to apply.

In deployments that rely on Rack::Static to attach security-relevant response headers to static content, this can allow an attacker to bypass those headers by requesting an encoded form of the path.

Details

Rack::Static#applicable_rules matches rule types such as :fonts, Array, and Regexp directly against the incoming PATH_INFO. For example:

when :fonts
  /\.(?:ttf|otf|eot|woff2|woff|svg)\z/.match?(path)
when Array
  /\.(#{rule.join('|')})\z/.match?(path)
when Regexp
  rule.match?(path)

These checks operate on the raw request path. If the request contains encoded characters such as %2E in place of ., the rule may fail to match even though the file path is later decoded and served successfully by the static file server.

For example, both of the following requests may resolve to the same file on disk:

/fonts/test.woff
/fonts/test%2Ewoff

but only the unencoded form may receive the headers configured through header_rules.

This creates a canonicalization mismatch between the path used for header policy decisions and the path ultimately used for file serving.

Impact

Applications that rely on Rack::Static header_rules to apply security-relevant headers to static files may be affected.

In affected deployments, an attacker can request an encoded variant of a static file path and receive the same file without the intended headers. Depending on how header_rules are used, this may bypass protections such as clickjacking defenses, content restrictions, or other response policies applied to static content.

The practical impact depends on the configured rules and the types of files being served. If header_rules are only used for non-security purposes such as caching, the issue may have limited security significance.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that applies header_rules to a decoded path consistently with static file resolution.
  • Do not rely solely on Rack::Static header_rules for security-critical headers where encoded path variants may reach the application.
  • Prefer setting security headers at the reverse proxy or web server layer so they apply consistently to both encoded and unencoded path forms.
  • Normalize or reject encoded path variants for static content at the edge, where feasible.

🚨 Rack::Static prefix matching can expose unintended files under the static root

Summary

Rack::Static determines whether a request should be served as a static file using a simple string prefix check. When configured with URL prefixes such as "/css", it matches any request path that begins with that string, including unrelated paths such as "/css-config.env" or "/css-backup.sql".

As a result, files under the static root whose names merely share the configured prefix may be served unintentionally, leading to information disclosure.

Details

Rack::Static#route_file performs static-route matching using logic equivalent to:

@urls.any? { |url| path.index(url) == 0 }

This checks only whether the request path starts with the configured prefix string. It does not require a path segment boundary after the prefix.

For example, with:

use Rack::Static, urls: ["/css", "/js"], root: "public"

the following path is matched as intended:

/css/style.css

but these paths are also matched:

/css-config.env
/css-backup.sql
/csssecrets.yml

If such files exist under the configured static root, Rack forwards the request to the file server and serves them as static content.

This means a configuration intended to expose only directory trees such as /css/... and /js/... may also expose sibling files whose names begin with those same strings.

Impact

An attacker can request files under the configured static root whose names share a configured URL prefix and obtain their contents.

In affected deployments, this may expose configuration files, secrets, backups, environment files, or other unintended static content located under the same root directory.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that enforces a path boundary when matching configured static URL prefixes.
  • Match only paths that are either exactly equal to the configured prefix or begin with prefix + "/".
  • Avoid placing sensitive files under the Rack::Static root directory.
  • Prefer static URL mappings that cannot overlap with sensitive filenames.

🚨 Rack has Content-Length mismatch in Rack::Files error responses

Summary

Rack::Files#fail sets the Content-Length response header using String#size instead of String#bytesize. When the response body contains multibyte UTF-8 characters, the declared Content-Length is smaller than the number of bytes actually sent on the wire.

Because Rack::Files reflects the requested path in 404 responses, an attacker can trigger this mismatch by requesting a non-existent path containing percent-encoded UTF-8 characters.

This results in incorrect HTTP response framing and may cause response desynchronization in deployments that rely on the incorrect Content-Length value.

Details

Rack::Files#fail constructs error responses using logic equivalent to:

def fail(status, body, headers = {})
  body += "\n"
  [
    status,
    {
      "content-type" => "text/plain",
      "content-length" => body.size.to_s,
      "x-cascade" => "pass"
    }.merge!(headers),
    [body]
  ]
end

Here, body.size returns the number of characters, not the number of bytes. For multibyte UTF-8 strings, this produces an incorrect Content-Length value.

Rack::Files includes the decoded request path in 404 responses. A request containing percent-encoded UTF-8 path components therefore causes the response body to contain multibyte characters, while the Content-Length header still reflects character count rather than byte count.

As a result, the server can send more bytes than declared in the response headers.

This violates HTTP message framing requirements, which define Content-Length as the number of octets in the message body.

Impact

Applications using Rack::Files may emit incorrectly framed error responses when handling requests for non-existent paths containing multibyte characters.

In some deployment topologies, particularly with keep-alive connections and intermediaries that rely on Content-Length, this mismatch may lead to response parsing inconsistencies or response desynchronization. The practical exploitability depends on the behavior of downstream proxies, clients, and connection reuse.

Even where no secondary exploitation is possible, the response is malformed and may trigger protocol errors in strict components.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that computes Content-Length using String#bytesize.
  • Avoid exposing Rack::Files directly to untrusted traffic until a fix is available, if operationally feasible.
  • Where possible, place Rack behind a proxy or server that normalizes or rejects malformed backend responses.
  • Prefer closing backend connections on error paths if response framing anomalies are a concern.

🚨 Rack::Sendfile header-based X-Accel-Mapping regex injection enables unauthorized X-Accel-Redirect

Summary

Rack::Sendfile#map_accel_path interpolates the value of the X-Accel-Mapping request header directly into a regular expression when rewriting file paths for X-Accel-Redirect. Because the header value is not escaped, an attacker who can supply X-Accel-Mapping to the backend can inject regex metacharacters and control the generated X-Accel-Redirect response header.

In deployments using Rack::Sendfile with x-accel-redirect, this can allow an attacker to cause nginx to serve unintended files from configured internal locations.

Details

Rack::Sendfile#map_accel_path processes header-supplied mappings using logic equivalent to:

mapping.split(',').map(&:strip).each do |m|
  internal, external = m.split('=', 2).map(&:strip)
  new_path = path.sub(/\A#{internal}/i, external)
  return new_path unless path == new_path
end

Here, internal comes from the HTTP_X_ACCEL_MAPPING request header and is inserted directly into a regular expression without escaping. This gives the header value regex semantics rather than treating it as a literal prefix.

As a result, an attacker can supply metacharacters such as .* or capture groups to alter how the path substitution is performed. For example, a mapping such as:

X-Accel-Mapping: .*=/protected/secret.txt

causes the entire source path to match and rewrites the redirect target to a clean attacker-chosen internal path.

This differs from the documented behavior of the header-based mapping path, which is described as a simple substitution. While application-supplied mappings may intentionally support regular expressions, header-supplied mappings should be treated as literal path prefixes.

The issue is only exploitable when untrusted X-Accel-Mapping headers can reach Rack. One realistic case is a reverse proxy configuration that intends to set X-Accel-Mapping itself, but fails to do so on some routes, allowing a client-supplied header to pass through unchanged.

Impact

Applications using Rack::Sendfile with x-accel-redirect may be affected if the backend accepts attacker-controlled X-Accel-Mapping headers.

In affected deployments, an attacker may be able to control the X-Accel-Redirect response header and cause nginx to serve files from internal locations that were not intended to be reachable through the application. This can lead to unauthorized file disclosure.

The practical impact depends on deployment architecture. If the proxy always strips or overwrites X-Accel-Mapping, or if the application uses explicit configured mappings instead of the request header, exploitability may be eliminated.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that treats header-supplied X-Accel-Mapping values as literal strings rather than regular expressions.
  • Strip or overwrite inbound X-Accel-Mapping headers at the reverse proxy so client-supplied values never reach Rack.
  • Prefer explicit application-configured sendfile mappings instead of relying on request-header mappings.
  • Review proxy sub-locations and inherited header settings to ensure X-Accel-Mapping is consistently set on all backend routes.

🚨 Rack's multipart parsing without Content-Length header allows unbounded chunked file uploads

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser only wraps the request body in a BoundedIO when CONTENT_LENGTH is present. When a multipart/form-data request is sent without a Content-Length header, such as with HTTP chunked transfer encoding, multipart parsing continues until end-of-stream with no total size limit.

For file parts, the uploaded body is written directly to a temporary file on disk rather than being constrained by the buffered in-memory upload limit. An unauthenticated attacker can therefore stream an arbitrarily large multipart file upload and consume unbounded disk space.

This results in a denial of service condition for Rack applications that accept multipart form data.

Details

Rack::Multipart::Parser.parse applies BoundedIO only when content_length is not nil:

io = BoundedIO.new(io, content_length) if content_length

When CONTENT_LENGTH is absent, the parser reads the multipart body until EOF without a global byte limit.

Although Rack enforces BUFFERED_UPLOAD_BYTESIZE_LIMIT for retained non-file parts, file uploads are handled differently. When a multipart part includes a filename, the body is streamed to a Tempfile, and the retained-size accounting is not applied to that file content. As a result, file parts are not subject to the same upload size bound.

An attacker can exploit this by sending a chunked multipart/form-data request containing a file part and continuously streaming data without declaring a Content-Length. Rack will continue writing the uploaded data to disk until the client stops or the server exhausts available storage.

Impact

Any Rack application that accepts multipart/form-data uploads may be affected if no upstream component enforces a request body size limit.

An unauthenticated attacker can send a large chunked file upload to consume disk space on the application host. This may cause request failures, application instability, or broader service disruption if the host runs out of available storage.

The practical impact depends on deployment architecture. Reverse proxies or application servers that enforce upload limits may reduce or eliminate exploitability, but Rack itself does not impose a total multipart upload limit in this code path when CONTENT_LENGTH is absent.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that enforces a total multipart upload size limit even when CONTENT_LENGTH is absent.
  • Enforce request body size limits at the reverse proxy or application server.
  • Isolate temporary upload storage and monitor disk consumption for multipart endpoints.

🚨 Rack has a root directory disclosure via unescaped regex interpolation in Rack::Directory

Summary

Rack::Directory interpolates the configured root path directly into a regular expression when deriving the displayed directory path. If root contains regex metacharacters such as +, *, or ., the prefix stripping can fail and the generated directory listing may expose the full filesystem path in the HTML output.

Details

Rack::Directory::DirectoryBody#each computes the visible path using code equivalent to:

show_path = Utils.escape_html(path.sub(/\A#{root}/, ''))

Here, root is a developer-configured filesystem path. It is normalized earlier with File.expand_path(root) and then inserted directly into a regular expression without escaping.

Because the value is treated as regex syntax rather than as a literal string, metacharacters in the configured path can change how the prefix match behaves. When that happens, the expected root prefix is not removed from path, and the absolute filesystem path is rendered into the HTML directory listing.

Impact

If Rack::Directory is configured to serve a directory whose absolute path contains regex metacharacters, the generated directory listing may disclose the full server filesystem path instead of only the request-relative path.

This can expose internal deployment details such as directory layout, usernames, mount points, or naming conventions that would otherwise not be visible to clients.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack in which the root prefix is removed using an escaped regular expression.
  • Avoid using Rack::Directory with a root path that contains regular expression metacharacters.

🚨 Rack has quadratic complexity in Rack::Utils.select_best_encoding via wildcard Accept-Encoding header

Summary

Rack::Utils.select_best_encoding processes Accept-Encoding values with quadratic time complexity when the header contains many wildcard (*) entries. Because this method is used by Rack::Deflater to choose a response encoding, an unauthenticated attacker can send a single request with a crafted Accept-Encoding header and cause disproportionate CPU consumption on the compression middleware path.

This results in a denial of service condition for applications using Rack::Deflater.

Details

Rack::Utils.select_best_encoding expands parsed Accept-Encoding values into a list of candidate encodings. When an entry is *, the method computes the set of concrete encodings by subtracting the encodings already present in the request:

if m == "*"
  (available_encodings - accept_encoding.map(&:first)).each do |m2|
    expanded_accept_encoding << [m2, q, preference]
  end
else
  expanded_accept_encoding << [m, q, preference]
end

Because accept_encoding.map(&:first) is evaluated inside the loop, it is recomputed for each wildcard entry. If the request contains N wildcard entries, this produces repeated scans over the full parsed header and causes quadratic behavior.

After expansion, the method also performs additional work over expanded_accept_encoding, including per-entry deletion, which further increases the cost for large inputs.

Rack::Deflater invokes this method for each request when the middleware is enabled:

Utils.select_best_encoding(ENCODINGS, Utils.parse_encodings(accept_encoding))

As a result, a client can trigger this expensive code path simply by sending a large Accept-Encoding header containing many repeated wildcard values.

For example, a request with an approximately 8 KB Accept-Encoding header containing about 1,000 *;q=0.5 entries can cause roughly 170 ms of CPU time in a single request on the Rack::Deflater path, compared to a negligible baseline for a normal header.

This issue is distinct from CVE-2024-26146. That issue concerned regular expression denial of service during Accept header parsing, whereas this issue arises later during encoding selection after the header has already been parsed.

Impact

Any Rack application using Rack::Deflater may be affected.

An unauthenticated attacker can send requests with crafted Accept-Encoding headers to trigger excessive CPU usage in the encoding selection logic. Repeated requests can consume worker time disproportionately and reduce application availability.

The attack does not require invalid HTTP syntax or large payload bodies. A single header-sized request is sufficient to reach the vulnerable code path.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack in which encoding selection does not repeatedly rescan the parsed header for wildcard entries.
  • Avoid enabling Rack::Deflater on untrusted traffic.
  • Apply request filtering or header size / format restrictions at the reverse proxy or application boundary to limit abusive Accept-Encoding values.

🚨 Rack's greedy multipart boundary parsing can cause parser differentials and WAF bypass.

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser extracts the boundary parameter from multipart/form-data using a greedy regular expression. When a Content-Type header contains multiple boundary parameters, Rack selects the last one rather than the first.

In deployments where an upstream proxy, WAF, or intermediary interprets the first boundary parameter, this mismatch can allow an attacker to smuggle multipart content past upstream inspection and have Rack parse a different body structure than the intermediary validated.

Details

Rack identifies the multipart boundary using logic equivalent to:

MULTIPART = %r|\Amultipart/.*boundary=\"?([^\";,]+)\"?|ni

Because the expression is greedy, it matches the last boundary= parameter in a header such as:

Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=safe; boundary=malicious

As a result, Rack parses the request body using malicious, while another component may interpret the same header using safe.

This creates an interpretation conflict. If an upstream WAF or proxy inspects multipart parts using the first boundary and Rack later parses the body using the last boundary, a client may be able to place malicious form fields or uploaded content in parts that Rack accepts but the upstream component did not inspect as intended.

This issue is most relevant in layered deployments where security decisions are made before the request reaches Rack.

Impact

Applications that accept multipart/form-data uploads behind an inspecting proxy or WAF may be affected.

In such deployments, an attacker may be able to bypass upstream filtering of uploaded files or form fields by sending a request with multiple boundary parameters and relying on the intermediary and Rack to parse the request differently.

The practical impact depends on deployment architecture. If no upstream component relies on a different multipart interpretation, this behavior may not provide meaningful additional attacker capability.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that rejects ambiguous multipart Content-Type headers or parses duplicate boundary parameters consistently.
  • Reject requests containing multiple boundary parameters.
  • Normalize or regenerate multipart metadata at the trusted edge before forwarding requests to Rack.
  • Avoid relying on upstream inspection of malformed multipart requests unless duplicate parameter handling is explicitly consistent across components.

🚨 Rack::Request accepts invalid Host characters, enabling host allowlist bypass

Summary

Rack::Request parses the Host header using an AUTHORITY regular expression that accepts characters not permitted in RFC-compliant hostnames, including /, ?, #, and @. Because req.host returns the full parsed value, applications that validate hosts using naive prefix or suffix checks can be bypassed.

For example, a check such as req.host.start_with?("myapp.com") can be bypassed with Host: myapp.com@evil.com, and a check such as req.host.end_with?("myapp.com") can be bypassed with Host: evil.com/myapp.com.

This can lead to host header poisoning in applications that use req.host, req.url, or req.base_url for link generation, redirects, or origin validation.

Details

Rack::Request parses the authority component using logic equivalent to:

AUTHORITY = /
  \A
  (?<host>
    \[(?<address>#{ipv6})\]
    |
    (?<address>[[[:graph:]&&[^\[\]]]]*?)
  )
  (:(?<port>\d+))?
  \z
/x

The character class used for non-IPv6 hosts accepts nearly all printable characters except [ and ]. This includes reserved URI delimiters such as @, /, ?, and #, which are not valid hostname characters under RFC 3986 host syntax.

As a result, values such as the following are accepted and returned through req.host:

myapp.com@evil.com
evil.com/myapp.com
evil.com#myapp.com

Applications that attempt to allowlist hosts using string prefix or suffix checks may therefore treat attacker-controlled hosts as trusted. For example:

req.host.start_with?("myapp.com")

accepts:

myapp.com@evil.com

and:

req.host.end_with?("myapp.com")

accepts:

evil.com/myapp.com

When those values are later used to build absolute URLs or enforce origin restrictions, the application may produce attacker-controlled results.

Impact

Applications that rely on req.host, req.url, or req.base_url may be affected if they perform naive host validation or assume Rack only returns RFC-valid hostnames.

In affected deployments, an attacker may be able to bypass host allowlists and poison generated links, redirects, or origin-dependent security decisions. This can enable attacks such as password reset link poisoning or other host header injection issues.

The practical impact depends on application behavior. If the application or reverse proxy already enforces strict host validation, exploitability may be reduced or eliminated.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that rejects invalid authority characters in Host.
  • Enforce strict Host header validation at the reverse proxy or load balancer.
  • Do not rely on prefix or suffix string checks such as start_with? or end_with? for host allowlisting.
  • Use exact host allowlists, or exact subdomain boundary checks, after validating that the host is syntactically valid.

🚨 Rack has Content-Length mismatch in Rack::Files error responses

Summary

Rack::Files#fail sets the Content-Length response header using String#size instead of String#bytesize. When the response body contains multibyte UTF-8 characters, the declared Content-Length is smaller than the number of bytes actually sent on the wire.

Because Rack::Files reflects the requested path in 404 responses, an attacker can trigger this mismatch by requesting a non-existent path containing percent-encoded UTF-8 characters.

This results in incorrect HTTP response framing and may cause response desynchronization in deployments that rely on the incorrect Content-Length value.

Details

Rack::Files#fail constructs error responses using logic equivalent to:

def fail(status, body, headers = {})
  body += "\n"
  [
    status,
    {
      "content-type" => "text/plain",
      "content-length" => body.size.to_s,
      "x-cascade" => "pass"
    }.merge!(headers),
    [body]
  ]
end

Here, body.size returns the number of characters, not the number of bytes. For multibyte UTF-8 strings, this produces an incorrect Content-Length value.

Rack::Files includes the decoded request path in 404 responses. A request containing percent-encoded UTF-8 path components therefore causes the response body to contain multibyte characters, while the Content-Length header still reflects character count rather than byte count.

As a result, the server can send more bytes than declared in the response headers.

This violates HTTP message framing requirements, which define Content-Length as the number of octets in the message body.

Impact

Applications using Rack::Files may emit incorrectly framed error responses when handling requests for non-existent paths containing multibyte characters.

In some deployment topologies, particularly with keep-alive connections and intermediaries that rely on Content-Length, this mismatch may lead to response parsing inconsistencies or response desynchronization. The practical exploitability depends on the behavior of downstream proxies, clients, and connection reuse.

Even where no secondary exploitation is possible, the response is malformed and may trigger protocol errors in strict components.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that computes Content-Length using String#bytesize.
  • Avoid exposing Rack::Files directly to untrusted traffic until a fix is available, if operationally feasible.
  • Where possible, place Rack behind a proxy or server that normalizes or rejects malformed backend responses.
  • Prefer closing backend connections on error paths if response framing anomalies are a concern.

🚨 Rack has a Directory Traversal via Rack:Directory

Summary

Rack::Directory’s path check used a string prefix match on the expanded path. A request like /../root_example/ can escape the configured root if the target path starts with the root string, allowing directory listing outside the intended root.

Details

In directory.rb, File.expand_path(File.join(root, path_info)).start_with?(root) does not enforce a path boundary. If the server root is /var/www/root, a path like /var/www/root_backup passes the check because it shares the same prefix, so Rack::Directory will list that directory also.

Impact

Information disclosure via directory listing outside the configured root when Rack::Directory is exposed to untrusted clients and a directory shares the root prefix (e.g., public2, www_backup).

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that correctly checks the root prefix.
  • Don't name directories with the same prefix as one which is exposed via Rack::Directory.

🚨 Rack has a Directory Traversal via Rack:Directory

Summary

Rack::Directory’s path check used a string prefix match on the expanded path. A request like /../root_example/ can escape the configured root if the target path starts with the root string, allowing directory listing outside the intended root.

Details

In directory.rb, File.expand_path(File.join(root, path_info)).start_with?(root) does not enforce a path boundary. If the server root is /var/www/root, a path like /var/www/root_backup passes the check because it shares the same prefix, so Rack::Directory will list that directory also.

Impact

Information disclosure via directory listing outside the configured root when Rack::Directory is exposed to untrusted clients and a directory shares the root prefix (e.g., public2, www_backup).

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that correctly checks the root prefix.
  • Don't name directories with the same prefix as one which is exposed via Rack::Directory.

🚨 Stored XSS in Rack::Directory via javascript: filenames rendered into anchor href

Summary

Rack::Directory generates an HTML directory index where each file entry is rendered as a clickable link. If a file exists on disk whose basename begins with the javascript: scheme (e.g. javascript:alert(1)), the generated index includes an anchor whose href attribute is exactly javascript:alert(1). Clicking this entry executes arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the hosting application.

This results in a client-side XSS condition in directory listings generated by Rack::Directory.

Details

Rack::Directory renders directory entries using an HTML row template similar to:

<a href='%s'>%s</a>

The %s placeholder is populated directly with the file’s basename. If the basename begins with javascript:, the resulting HTML contains an executable JavaScript URL:

<a href='javascript:alert(1)'>javascript:alert(1)</a>

Because the value is inserted directly into the href attribute without scheme validation or normalization, browsers interpret it as a JavaScript URI. When a user clicks the link, the JavaScript executes in the origin of the Rack application.

Impact

If Rack::Directory is used to expose filesystem contents over HTTP, an attacker who can create or upload files within that directory may introduce a malicious filename beginning with javascript:.

When a user visits the directory listing and clicks the entry, arbitrary JavaScript executes in the application's origin. Exploitation requires user interaction (clicking the malicious entry).

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack in which Rack::Directory prefixes generated anchors with a relative path indicator (e.g. ./filename).
  • Avoid exposing user-controlled directories via Rack::Directory.
  • Apply a strict Content Security Policy (CSP) to reduce impact of potential client-side execution issues.
  • Where feasible, restrict or sanitize uploaded filenames to disallow dangerous URI scheme prefixes.

HackerOne profile:
https://hackerone.com/thesmartshadow

GitHub account owner:
Ali Firas (@thesmartshadow)

🚨 Rack has a Directory Traversal via Rack:Directory

Summary

Rack::Directory’s path check used a string prefix match on the expanded path. A request like /../root_example/ can escape the configured root if the target path starts with the root string, allowing directory listing outside the intended root.

Details

In directory.rb, File.expand_path(File.join(root, path_info)).start_with?(root) does not enforce a path boundary. If the server root is /var/www/root, a path like /var/www/root_backup passes the check because it shares the same prefix, so Rack::Directory will list that directory also.

Impact

Information disclosure via directory listing outside the configured root when Rack::Directory is exposed to untrusted clients and a directory shares the root prefix (e.g., public2, www_backup).

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that correctly checks the root prefix.
  • Don't name directories with the same prefix as one which is exposed via Rack::Directory.

🚨 Stored XSS in Rack::Directory via javascript: filenames rendered into anchor href

Summary

Rack::Directory generates an HTML directory index where each file entry is rendered as a clickable link. If a file exists on disk whose basename begins with the javascript: scheme (e.g. javascript:alert(1)), the generated index includes an anchor whose href attribute is exactly javascript:alert(1). Clicking this entry executes arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the hosting application.

This results in a client-side XSS condition in directory listings generated by Rack::Directory.

Details

Rack::Directory renders directory entries using an HTML row template similar to:

<a href='%s'>%s</a>

The %s placeholder is populated directly with the file’s basename. If the basename begins with javascript:, the resulting HTML contains an executable JavaScript URL:

<a href='javascript:alert(1)'>javascript:alert(1)</a>

Because the value is inserted directly into the href attribute without scheme validation or normalization, browsers interpret it as a JavaScript URI. When a user clicks the link, the JavaScript executes in the origin of the Rack application.

Impact

If Rack::Directory is used to expose filesystem contents over HTTP, an attacker who can create or upload files within that directory may introduce a malicious filename beginning with javascript:.

When a user visits the directory listing and clicks the entry, arbitrary JavaScript executes in the application's origin. Exploitation requires user interaction (clicking the malicious entry).

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack in which Rack::Directory prefixes generated anchors with a relative path indicator (e.g. ./filename).
  • Avoid exposing user-controlled directories via Rack::Directory.
  • Apply a strict Content Security Policy (CSP) to reduce impact of potential client-side execution issues.
  • Where feasible, restrict or sanitize uploaded filenames to disallow dangerous URI scheme prefixes.

HackerOne profile:
https://hackerone.com/thesmartshadow

GitHub account owner:
Ali Firas (@thesmartshadow)

🚨 Stored XSS in Rack::Directory via javascript: filenames rendered into anchor href

Summary

Rack::Directory generates an HTML directory index where each file entry is rendered as a clickable link. If a file exists on disk whose basename begins with the javascript: scheme (e.g. javascript:alert(1)), the generated index includes an anchor whose href attribute is exactly javascript:alert(1). Clicking this entry executes arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the hosting application.

This results in a client-side XSS condition in directory listings generated by Rack::Directory.

Details

Rack::Directory renders directory entries using an HTML row template similar to:

<a href='%s'>%s</a>

The %s placeholder is populated directly with the file’s basename. If the basename begins with javascript:, the resulting HTML contains an executable JavaScript URL:

<a href='javascript:alert(1)'>javascript:alert(1)</a>

Because the value is inserted directly into the href attribute without scheme validation or normalization, browsers interpret it as a JavaScript URI. When a user clicks the link, the JavaScript executes in the origin of the Rack application.

Impact

If Rack::Directory is used to expose filesystem contents over HTTP, an attacker who can create or upload files within that directory may introduce a malicious filename beginning with javascript:.

When a user visits the directory listing and clicks the entry, arbitrary JavaScript executes in the application's origin. Exploitation requires user interaction (clicking the malicious entry).

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack in which Rack::Directory prefixes generated anchors with a relative path indicator (e.g. ./filename).
  • Avoid exposing user-controlled directories via Rack::Directory.
  • Apply a strict Content Security Policy (CSP) to reduce impact of potential client-side execution issues.
  • Where feasible, restrict or sanitize uploaded filenames to disallow dangerous URI scheme prefixes.

HackerOne profile:
https://hackerone.com/thesmartshadow

GitHub account owner:
Ali Firas (@thesmartshadow)

🚨 Rack is vulnerable to a memory-exhaustion DoS through unbounded URL-encoded body parsing

Summary

Rack::Request#POST reads the entire request body into memory for Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded, calling rack.input.read(nil) without enforcing a length or cap. Large request bodies can therefore be buffered completely into process memory before parsing, leading to denial of service (DoS) through memory exhaustion.

Details

When handling non-multipart form submissions, Rack’s request parser performs:

form_vars = get_header(RACK_INPUT).read

Since read is called with no argument, the entire request body is loaded into a Ruby String. This occurs before query parameter parsing or enforcement of any params_limit. As a result, Rack applications without an upstream body-size limit can experience unbounded memory allocation proportional to request size.

Impact

Attackers can send large application/x-www-form-urlencoded bodies to consume process memory, causing slowdowns or termination by the operating system (OOM). The effect scales linearly with request size and concurrency. Even with parsing limits configured, the issue occurs before those limits are enforced.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that enforces form parameter limits using query_parser.bytesize_limit, preventing unbounded reads of application/x-www-form-urlencoded bodies.
  • Enforce strict maximum body size at the proxy or web server layer (e.g., Nginx client_max_body_size, Apache LimitRequestBody).

🚨 Rack has a Possible Information Disclosure Vulnerability

Summary

A possible information disclosure vulnerability existed in Rack::Sendfile when running behind a proxy that supports x-sendfile headers (such as Nginx). Specially crafted headers could cause Rack::Sendfile to miscommunicate with the proxy and trigger unintended internal requests, potentially bypassing proxy-level access restrictions.

Details

When Rack::Sendfile received untrusted x-sendfile-type or x-accel-mapping headers from a client, it would interpret them as proxy configuration directives. This could cause the middleware to send a "redirect" response to the proxy, prompting it to reissue a new internal request that was not subject to the proxy's access controls.

An attacker could exploit this by:

  1. Setting a crafted x-sendfile-type: x-accel-redirect header.
  2. Setting a crafted x-accel-mapping header.
  3. Requesting a path that qualifies for proxy-based acceleration.

Impact

Attackers could bypass proxy-enforced restrictions and access internal endpoints intended to be protected (such as administrative pages). The vulnerability did not allow arbitrary file reads but could expose sensitive application routes.

This issue only affected systems meeting all of the following conditions:

  • The application used Rack::Sendfile with a proxy that supports x-accel-redirect (e.g., Nginx).
  • The proxy did not always set or remove the x-sendfile-type and x-accel-mapping headers.
  • The application exposed an endpoint that returned a body responding to .to_path.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a fixed version of Rack which requires explicit configuration to enable x-accel-redirect:

    use Rack::Sendfile, "x-accel-redirect"
  • Alternatively, configure the proxy to always set or strip the headers (you should be doing this!):

    proxy_set_header x-sendfile-type x-accel-redirect;
    proxy_set_header x-accel-mapping /var/www/=/files/;
  • Or in Rails applications, disable sendfile completely:

    config.action_dispatch.x_sendfile_header = nil

🚨 Rack is vulnerable to a memory-exhaustion DoS through unbounded URL-encoded body parsing

Summary

Rack::Request#POST reads the entire request body into memory for Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded, calling rack.input.read(nil) without enforcing a length or cap. Large request bodies can therefore be buffered completely into process memory before parsing, leading to denial of service (DoS) through memory exhaustion.

Details

When handling non-multipart form submissions, Rack’s request parser performs:

form_vars = get_header(RACK_INPUT).read

Since read is called with no argument, the entire request body is loaded into a Ruby String. This occurs before query parameter parsing or enforcement of any params_limit. As a result, Rack applications without an upstream body-size limit can experience unbounded memory allocation proportional to request size.

Impact

Attackers can send large application/x-www-form-urlencoded bodies to consume process memory, causing slowdowns or termination by the operating system (OOM). The effect scales linearly with request size and concurrency. Even with parsing limits configured, the issue occurs before those limits are enforced.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that enforces form parameter limits using query_parser.bytesize_limit, preventing unbounded reads of application/x-www-form-urlencoded bodies.
  • Enforce strict maximum body size at the proxy or web server layer (e.g., Nginx client_max_body_size, Apache LimitRequestBody).

🚨 Rack has a Possible Information Disclosure Vulnerability

Summary

A possible information disclosure vulnerability existed in Rack::Sendfile when running behind a proxy that supports x-sendfile headers (such as Nginx). Specially crafted headers could cause Rack::Sendfile to miscommunicate with the proxy and trigger unintended internal requests, potentially bypassing proxy-level access restrictions.

Details

When Rack::Sendfile received untrusted x-sendfile-type or x-accel-mapping headers from a client, it would interpret them as proxy configuration directives. This could cause the middleware to send a "redirect" response to the proxy, prompting it to reissue a new internal request that was not subject to the proxy's access controls.

An attacker could exploit this by:

  1. Setting a crafted x-sendfile-type: x-accel-redirect header.
  2. Setting a crafted x-accel-mapping header.
  3. Requesting a path that qualifies for proxy-based acceleration.

Impact

Attackers could bypass proxy-enforced restrictions and access internal endpoints intended to be protected (such as administrative pages). The vulnerability did not allow arbitrary file reads but could expose sensitive application routes.

This issue only affected systems meeting all of the following conditions:

  • The application used Rack::Sendfile with a proxy that supports x-accel-redirect (e.g., Nginx).
  • The proxy did not always set or remove the x-sendfile-type and x-accel-mapping headers.
  • The application exposed an endpoint that returned a body responding to .to_path.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a fixed version of Rack which requires explicit configuration to enable x-accel-redirect:

    use Rack::Sendfile, "x-accel-redirect"
  • Alternatively, configure the proxy to always set or strip the headers (you should be doing this!):

    proxy_set_header x-sendfile-type x-accel-redirect;
    proxy_set_header x-accel-mapping /var/www/=/files/;
  • Or in Rails applications, disable sendfile completely:

    config.action_dispatch.x_sendfile_header = nil

🚨 Rack is vulnerable to a memory-exhaustion DoS through unbounded URL-encoded body parsing

Summary

Rack::Request#POST reads the entire request body into memory for Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded, calling rack.input.read(nil) without enforcing a length or cap. Large request bodies can therefore be buffered completely into process memory before parsing, leading to denial of service (DoS) through memory exhaustion.

Details

When handling non-multipart form submissions, Rack’s request parser performs:

form_vars = get_header(RACK_INPUT).read

Since read is called with no argument, the entire request body is loaded into a Ruby String. This occurs before query parameter parsing or enforcement of any params_limit. As a result, Rack applications without an upstream body-size limit can experience unbounded memory allocation proportional to request size.

Impact

Attackers can send large application/x-www-form-urlencoded bodies to consume process memory, causing slowdowns or termination by the operating system (OOM). The effect scales linearly with request size and concurrency. Even with parsing limits configured, the issue occurs before those limits are enforced.

Mitigation

  • Update to a patched version of Rack that enforces form parameter limits using query_parser.bytesize_limit, preventing unbounded reads of application/x-www-form-urlencoded bodies.
  • Enforce strict maximum body size at the proxy or web server layer (e.g., Nginx client_max_body_size, Apache LimitRequestBody).

🚨 Rack has a Possible Information Disclosure Vulnerability

Summary

A possible information disclosure vulnerability existed in Rack::Sendfile when running behind a proxy that supports x-sendfile headers (such as Nginx). Specially crafted headers could cause Rack::Sendfile to miscommunicate with the proxy and trigger unintended internal requests, potentially bypassing proxy-level access restrictions.

Details

When Rack::Sendfile received untrusted x-sendfile-type or x-accel-mapping headers from a client, it would interpret them as proxy configuration directives. This could cause the middleware to send a "redirect" response to the proxy, prompting it to reissue a new internal request that was not subject to the proxy's access controls.

An attacker could exploit this by:

  1. Setting a crafted x-sendfile-type: x-accel-redirect header.
  2. Setting a crafted x-accel-mapping header.
  3. Requesting a path that qualifies for proxy-based acceleration.

Impact

Attackers could bypass proxy-enforced restrictions and access internal endpoints intended to be protected (such as administrative pages). The vulnerability did not allow arbitrary file reads but could expose sensitive application routes.

This issue only affected systems meeting all of the following conditions:

  • The application used Rack::Sendfile with a proxy that supports x-accel-redirect (e.g., Nginx).
  • The proxy did not always set or remove the x-sendfile-type and x-accel-mapping headers.
  • The application exposed an endpoint that returned a body responding to .to_path.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a fixed version of Rack which requires explicit configuration to enable x-accel-redirect:

    use Rack::Sendfile, "x-accel-redirect"
  • Alternatively, configure the proxy to always set or strip the headers (you should be doing this!):

    proxy_set_header x-sendfile-type x-accel-redirect;
    proxy_set_header x-accel-mapping /var/www/=/files/;
  • Or in Rails applications, disable sendfile completely:

    config.action_dispatch.x_sendfile_header = nil

🚨 Rack's unbounded multipart preamble buffering enables DoS (memory exhaustion)

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser buffers the entire multipart preamble (bytes before the first boundary) in memory without any size limit. A client can send a large preamble followed by a valid boundary, causing significant memory use and potential process termination due to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions.

Details

While searching for the first boundary, the parser appends incoming data into a shared buffer (@sbuf.concat(content)) and scans for the boundary pattern:

@sbuf.scan_until(@body_regex)

If the boundary is not yet found, the parser continues buffering data indefinitely. There is no trimming or size cap on the preamble, allowing attackers to send arbitrary amounts of data before the first boundary.

Impact

Remote attackers can trigger large transient memory spikes by including a long preamble in multipart/form-data requests. The impact scales with allowed request sizes and concurrency, potentially causing worker crashes or severe slowdown due to garbage collection.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade: Use a patched version of Rack that enforces a preamble size limit (e.g., 16 KiB) or discards preamble data entirely per RFC 2046 Β§ 5.1.1.
  • Workarounds:
    • Limit total request body size at the proxy or web server level.
    • Monitor memory and set per-process limits to prevent OOM conditions.

🚨 Rack's multipart parser buffers unbounded per-part headers, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser can accumulate unbounded data when a multipart part’s header block never terminates with the required blank line (CRLFCRLF). The parser keeps appending incoming bytes to memory without a size cap, allowing a remote attacker to exhaust memory and cause a denial of service (DoS).

Details

While reading multipart headers, the parser waits for CRLFCRLF using:

@sbuf.scan_until(/(.*?\r\n)\r\n/m)

If the terminator never appears, it continues appending data (@sbuf.concat(content)) indefinitely. There is no limit on accumulated header bytes, so a single malformed part can consume memory proportional to the request body size.

Impact

Attackers can send incomplete multipart headers to trigger high memory use, leading to process termination (OOM) or severe slowdown. The effect scales with request size limits and concurrency. All applications handling multipart uploads may be affected.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a patched Rack version that caps per-part header size (e.g., 64 KiB).
  • Until then, restrict maximum request sizes at the proxy or web server layer (e.g., Nginx client_max_body_size).

🚨 Rack: Multipart parser buffers large non‑file fields entirely in memory, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser stores non-file form fields (parts without a filename) entirely in memory as Ruby String objects. A single large text field in a multipart/form-data request (hundreds of megabytes or more) can consume equivalent process memory, potentially leading to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions and denial of service (DoS).

Details

During multipart parsing, file parts are streamed to temporary files, but non-file parts are buffered into memory:

body = String.new  # non-file β†’ in-RAM buffer
@mime_parts[mime_index].body << content

There is no size limit on these in-memory buffers. As a result, any large text fieldβ€”while technically validβ€”will be loaded fully into process memory before being added to params.

Impact

Attackers can send large non-file fields to trigger excessive memory usage. Impact scales with request size and concurrency, potentially leading to worker crashes or severe garbage-collection overhead. All Rack applications processing multipart form submissions are affected.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade: Use a patched version of Rack that enforces a reasonable size cap for non-file fields (e.g., 2 MiB).
  • Workarounds:
    • Restrict maximum request body size at the web-server or proxy layer (e.g., Nginx client_max_body_size).
    • Validate and reject unusually large form fields at the application level.

🚨 Rack's unbounded multipart preamble buffering enables DoS (memory exhaustion)

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser buffers the entire multipart preamble (bytes before the first boundary) in memory without any size limit. A client can send a large preamble followed by a valid boundary, causing significant memory use and potential process termination due to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions.

Details

While searching for the first boundary, the parser appends incoming data into a shared buffer (@sbuf.concat(content)) and scans for the boundary pattern:

@sbuf.scan_until(@body_regex)

If the boundary is not yet found, the parser continues buffering data indefinitely. There is no trimming or size cap on the preamble, allowing attackers to send arbitrary amounts of data before the first boundary.

Impact

Remote attackers can trigger large transient memory spikes by including a long preamble in multipart/form-data requests. The impact scales with allowed request sizes and concurrency, potentially causing worker crashes or severe slowdown due to garbage collection.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade: Use a patched version of Rack that enforces a preamble size limit (e.g., 16 KiB) or discards preamble data entirely per RFC 2046 Β§ 5.1.1.
  • Workarounds:
    • Limit total request body size at the proxy or web server level.
    • Monitor memory and set per-process limits to prevent OOM conditions.

🚨 Rack's multipart parser buffers unbounded per-part headers, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser can accumulate unbounded data when a multipart part’s header block never terminates with the required blank line (CRLFCRLF). The parser keeps appending incoming bytes to memory without a size cap, allowing a remote attacker to exhaust memory and cause a denial of service (DoS).

Details

While reading multipart headers, the parser waits for CRLFCRLF using:

@sbuf.scan_until(/(.*?\r\n)\r\n/m)

If the terminator never appears, it continues appending data (@sbuf.concat(content)) indefinitely. There is no limit on accumulated header bytes, so a single malformed part can consume memory proportional to the request body size.

Impact

Attackers can send incomplete multipart headers to trigger high memory use, leading to process termination (OOM) or severe slowdown. The effect scales with request size limits and concurrency. All applications handling multipart uploads may be affected.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a patched Rack version that caps per-part header size (e.g., 64 KiB).
  • Until then, restrict maximum request sizes at the proxy or web server layer (e.g., Nginx client_max_body_size).

🚨 Rack: Multipart parser buffers large non‑file fields entirely in memory, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser stores non-file form fields (parts without a filename) entirely in memory as Ruby String objects. A single large text field in a multipart/form-data request (hundreds of megabytes or more) can consume equivalent process memory, potentially leading to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions and denial of service (DoS).

Details

During multipart parsing, file parts are streamed to temporary files, but non-file parts are buffered into memory:

body = String.new  # non-file β†’ in-RAM buffer
@mime_parts[mime_index].body << content

There is no size limit on these in-memory buffers. As a result, any large text fieldβ€”while technically validβ€”will be loaded fully into process memory before being added to params.

Impact

Attackers can send large non-file fields to trigger excessive memory usage. Impact scales with request size and concurrency, potentially leading to worker crashes or severe garbage-collection overhead. All Rack applications processing multipart form submissions are affected.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade: Use a patched version of Rack that enforces a reasonable size cap for non-file fields (e.g., 2 MiB).
  • Workarounds:
    • Restrict maximum request body size at the web-server or proxy layer (e.g., Nginx client_max_body_size).
    • Validate and reject unusually large form fields at the application level.

🚨 Rack's unbounded multipart preamble buffering enables DoS (memory exhaustion)

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser buffers the entire multipart preamble (bytes before the first boundary) in memory without any size limit. A client can send a large preamble followed by a valid boundary, causing significant memory use and potential process termination due to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions.

Details

While searching for the first boundary, the parser appends incoming data into a shared buffer (@sbuf.concat(content)) and scans for the boundary pattern:

@sbuf.scan_until(@body_regex)

If the boundary is not yet found, the parser continues buffering data indefinitely. There is no trimming or size cap on the preamble, allowing attackers to send arbitrary amounts of data before the first boundary.

Impact

Remote attackers can trigger large transient memory spikes by including a long preamble in multipart/form-data requests. The impact scales with allowed request sizes and concurrency, potentially causing worker crashes or severe slowdown due to garbage collection.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade: Use a patched version of Rack that enforces a preamble size limit (e.g., 16 KiB) or discards preamble data entirely per RFC 2046 Β§ 5.1.1.
  • Workarounds:
    • Limit total request body size at the proxy or web server level.
    • Monitor memory and set per-process limits to prevent OOM conditions.

🚨 Rack's multipart parser buffers unbounded per-part headers, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser can accumulate unbounded data when a multipart part’s header block never terminates with the required blank line (CRLFCRLF). The parser keeps appending incoming bytes to memory without a size cap, allowing a remote attacker to exhaust memory and cause a denial of service (DoS).

Details

While reading multipart headers, the parser waits for CRLFCRLF using:

@sbuf.scan_until(/(.*?\r\n)\r\n/m)

If the terminator never appears, it continues appending data (@sbuf.concat(content)) indefinitely. There is no limit on accumulated header bytes, so a single malformed part can consume memory proportional to the request body size.

Impact

Attackers can send incomplete multipart headers to trigger high memory use, leading to process termination (OOM) or severe slowdown. The effect scales with request size limits and concurrency. All applications handling multipart uploads may be affected.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a patched Rack version that caps per-part header size (e.g., 64 KiB).
  • Until then, restrict maximum request sizes at the proxy or web server layer (e.g., Nginx client_max_body_size).

🚨 Rack: Multipart parser buffers large non‑file fields entirely in memory, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)

Summary

Rack::Multipart::Parser stores non-file form fields (parts without a filename) entirely in memory as Ruby String objects. A single large text field in a multipart/form-data request (hundreds of megabytes or more) can consume equivalent process memory, potentially leading to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions and denial of service (DoS).

Details

During multipart parsing, file parts are streamed to temporary files, but non-file parts are buffered into memory:

body = String.new  # non-file β†’ in-RAM buffer
@mime_parts[mime_index].body << content

There is no size limit on these in-memory buffers. As a result, any large text fieldβ€”while technically validβ€”will be loaded fully into process memory before being added to params.

Impact

Attackers can send large non-file fields to trigger excessive memory usage. Impact scales with request size and concurrency, potentially leading to worker crashes or severe garbage-collection overhead. All Rack applications processing multipart form submissions are affected.

Mitigation

  • Upgrade: Use a patched version of Rack that enforces a reasonable size cap for non-file fields (e.g., 2 MiB).
  • Workarounds:
    • Restrict maximum request body size at the web-server or proxy layer (e.g., Nginx client_max_body_size).
    • Validate and reject unusually large form fields at the application level.

🚨 ReDoS Vulnerability in Rack::Multipart handle_mime_head

Summary

There is a denial of service vulnerability in the Content-Disposition parsing component of Rack. This is very similar to the previous security issue CVE-2022-44571.

Details

Carefully crafted input can cause Content-Disposition header parsing in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. This header is used typically used in multipart parsing. Any applications that parse multipart posts using Rack (virtually all Rails applications) are impacted.

Credits

Thanks to scyoon for reporting this to the Rails security team

🚨 Rack has an Unbounded-Parameter DoS in Rack::QueryParser

Summary

Rack::QueryParser parses query strings and application/x-www-form-urlencoded bodies into Ruby data structures without imposing any limit on the number of parameters, allowing attackers to send requests with extremely large numbers of parameters.

Details

The vulnerability arises because Rack::QueryParser iterates over each &-separated key-value pair and adds it to a Hash without enforcing an upper bound on the total number of parameters. This allows an attacker to send a single request containing hundreds of thousands (or more) of parameters, which consumes excessive memory and CPU during parsing.

Impact

An attacker can trigger denial of service by sending specifically crafted HTTP requests, which can cause memory exhaustion or pin CPU resources, stalling or crashing the Rack server. This results in full service disruption until the affected worker is restarted.

Mitigation

  • Update to a version of Rack that limits the number of parameters parsed, or
  • Use middleware to enforce a maximum query string size or parameter count, or
  • Employ a reverse proxy (such as Nginx) to limit request sizes and reject oversized query strings or bodies.

Limiting request body sizes and query string lengths at the web server or CDN level is an effective mitigation.

🚨 Rack has an Unbounded-Parameter DoS in Rack::QueryParser

Summary

Rack::QueryParser parses query strings and application/x-www-form-urlencoded bodies into Ruby data structures without imposing any limit on the number of parameters, allowing attackers to send requests with extremely large numbers of parameters.

Details

The vulnerability arises because Rack::QueryParser iterates over each &-separated key-value pair and adds it to a Hash without enforcing an upper bound on the total number of parameters. This allows an attacker to send a single request containing hundreds of thousands (or more) of parameters, which consumes excessive memory and CPU during parsing.

Impact

An attacker can trigger denial of service by sending specifically crafted HTTP requests, which can cause memory exhaustion or pin CPU resources, stalling or crashing the Rack server. This results in full service disruption until the affected worker is restarted.

Mitigation

  • Update to a version of Rack that limits the number of parameters parsed, or
  • Use middleware to enforce a maximum query string size or parameter count, or
  • Employ a reverse proxy (such as Nginx) to limit request sizes and reject oversized query strings or bodies.

Limiting request body sizes and query string lengths at the web server or CDN level is an effective mitigation.

🚨 Local File Inclusion in Rack::Static

Summary

Rack::Static can serve files under the specified root: even if urls: are provided, which may expose other files under the specified root: unexpectedly.

Details

The vulnerability occurs because Rack::Static does not properly sanitize user-supplied paths before serving files. Specifically, encoded path traversal sequences are not correctly validated, allowing attackers to access files outside the designated static file directory.

Impact

By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can gain access to all files under the specified root: directory, provided they are able to determine then path of the file.

Mitigation

  • Update to the latest version of Rack, or
  • Remove usage of Rack::Static, or
  • Ensure that root: points at a directory path which only contains files which should be accessed publicly.

It is likely that a CDN or similar static file server would also mitigate the issue.

🚨 Local File Inclusion in Rack::Static

Summary

Rack::Static can serve files under the specified root: even if urls: are provided, which may expose other files under the specified root: unexpectedly.

Details

The vulnerability occurs because Rack::Static does not properly sanitize user-supplied paths before serving files. Specifically, encoded path traversal sequences are not correctly validated, allowing attackers to access files outside the designated static file directory.

Impact

By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can gain access to all files under the specified root: directory, provided they are able to determine then path of the file.

Mitigation

  • Update to the latest version of Rack, or
  • Remove usage of Rack::Static, or
  • Ensure that root: points at a directory path which only contains files which should be accessed publicly.

It is likely that a CDN or similar static file server would also mitigate the issue.

🚨 Escape Sequence Injection vulnerability in Rack lead to Possible Log Injection

Summary

Rack::Sendfile can be exploited by crafting input that includes newline characters to manipulate log entries.

Details

The Rack::Sendfile middleware logs unsanitized header values from the X-Sendfile-Type header. An attacker can exploit this by injecting escape sequences (such as newline characters) into the header, resulting in log injection.

Impact

This vulnerability can distort log files, obscure attack traces, and complicate security auditing.

Mitigation

  • Update to the latest version of Rack, or
  • Remove usage of Rack::Sendfile.

🚨 Escape Sequence Injection vulnerability in Rack lead to Possible Log Injection

Summary

Rack::Sendfile can be exploited by crafting input that includes newline characters to manipulate log entries.

Details

The Rack::Sendfile middleware logs unsanitized header values from the X-Sendfile-Type header. An attacker can exploit this by injecting escape sequences (such as newline characters) into the header, resulting in log injection.

Impact

This vulnerability can distort log files, obscure attack traces, and complicate security auditing.

Mitigation

  • Update to the latest version of Rack, or
  • Remove usage of Rack::Sendfile.

🚨 Possible Log Injection in Rack::CommonLogger

Summary

Rack::CommonLogger can be exploited by crafting input that includes newline characters to manipulate log entries. The supplied proof-of-concept demonstrates injecting malicious content into logs.

Details

When a user provides the authorization credentials via Rack::Auth::Basic, if success, the username will be put in env['REMOTE_USER'] and later be used by Rack::CommonLogger for logging purposes.

The issue occurs when a server intentionally or unintentionally allows a user creation with the username contain CRLF and white space characters, or the server just want to log every login attempts. If an attacker enters a username with CRLF character, the logger will log the malicious username with CRLF characters into the logfile.

Impact

Attackers can break log formats or insert fraudulent entries, potentially obscuring real activity or injecting malicious data into log files.

Mitigation

  • Update to the latest version of Rack.

🚨 Rack ReDoS Vulnerability in HTTP Accept Headers Parsing

Summary

A Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in the Rack::Request::Helpers module when parsing HTTP Accept headers. This vulnerability can be exploited by an attacker sending specially crafted Accept-Encoding or Accept-Language headers, causing the server to spend excessive time processing the request and leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).

Details

The fix for GHSA-54rr-7fvw-6x8f was not applied to the main branch and thus while the issue was fixed for the Rack v3.0 release series, it was not fixed in the v3.1 release series until v3.1.5.

🚨 Rack has possible DoS Vulnerability with Range Header

Possible DoS Vulnerability with Range Header in Rack

There is a possible DoS vulnerability relating to the Range request header in
Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-26141.

Versions Affected: >= 1.3.0.
Not affected: < 1.3.0
Fixed Versions: 3.0.9.1, 2.2.8.1

Impact

Carefully crafted Range headers can cause a server to respond with an
unexpectedly large response. Responding with such large responses could lead
to a denial of service issue.

Vulnerable applications will use the Rack::File middleware or the
Rack::Utils.byte_ranges methods (this includes Rails applications).

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.

Patches

To aid users who aren't able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for
the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a
single changeset.

  • 3-0-range.patch - Patch for 3.0 series
  • 2-2-range.patch - Patch for 2.2 series

Credits

Thank you ooooooo_q for the report and
patch

🚨 Rack Header Parsing leads to Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability

Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Header Parsing

There is a possible denial of service vulnerability in the header parsing
routines in Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier
CVE-2024-26146.

Versions Affected: All.
Not affected: None
Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.4, 2.1.4.4, 2.2.8.1, 3.0.9.1

Impact

Carefully crafted headers can cause header parsing in Rack to take longer than
expected resulting in a possible denial of service issue. Accept and Forwarded
headers are impacted.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rack applications using Ruby 3.2
or newer are unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.

Patches

To aid users who aren't able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for
the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a
single changeset.

  • 2-0-header-redos.patch - Patch for 2.0 series
  • 2-1-header-redos.patch - Patch for 2.1 series
  • 2-2-header-redos.patch - Patch for 2.2 series
  • 3-0-header-redos.patch - Patch for 3.0 series

Credits

Thanks to svalkanov for reporting this and
providing patches!

🚨 Rack vulnerable to ReDoS in content type parsing (2nd degree polynomial)

Summary

module Rack
  class MediaType
    SPLIT_PATTERN = %r{\s*[;,]\s*}

The above regexp is subject to ReDos. 50K blank characters as a prefix to the header will take over 10s to split.

PoC

A simple HTTP request with lots of blank characters in the content-type header:

request["Content-Type"] = (" " * 50_000) + "a,"

Impact

It's a very easy to craft ReDoS. Like all ReDoS the impact is debatable.

🚨 Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack's header parsing

There is a denial of service vulnerability in the header parsing component of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-27539.

Versions Affected: >= 2.0.0 Not affected: None. Fixed Versions: 2.2.6.4, 3.0.6.1

Impact

Carefully crafted input can cause header parsing in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. Any applications that parse headers using Rack (virtually all Rails applications) are impacted.

Workarounds

Setting Regexp.timeout in Ruby 3.2 is a possible workaround.

🚨 Rack has possible DoS Vulnerability in Multipart MIME parsing

There is a possible DoS vulnerability in the Multipart MIME parsing code in Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-27530.

Versions Affected: All. Not affected: None Fixed Versions: 3.0.4.2, 2.2.6.3, 2.1.4.3, 2.0.9.3

Impact

The Multipart MIME parsing code in Rack limits the number of file parts, but does not limit the total number of parts that can be uploaded. Carefully crafted requests can abuse this and cause multipart parsing to take longer than expected.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.

Workarounds

A proxy can be configured to limit the POST body size which will mitigate this issue.

🚨 Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Content-Disposition parsing

There is a denial of service vulnerability in the Content-Disposition parsing component of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-44571.

Versions Affected: >= 2.0.0 Not affected: None. Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.6.1, 3.0.0.1
Impact

Carefully crafted input can cause Content-Disposition header parsing in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. This header is used typically used in multipart parsing. Any applications that parse multipart posts using Rack (virtually all Rails applications) are impacted.
Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.
Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.
Patches

To aid users who aren’t able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.

2-0-Fix-ReDoS-vulnerability-in-multipart-parser - Patch for 2.0 series
2-1-Fix-ReDoS-vulnerability-in-multipart-parser - Patch for 2.1 series
2-2-Fix-ReDoS-vulnerability-in-multipart-parser - Patch for 2.2 series
3-0-Fix-ReDoS-vulnerability-in-multipart-parser - Patch for 3.0 series

🚨 Denial of service via header parsing in Rack

There is a possible denial of service vulnerability in the Range header parsing component of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-44570.

Versions Affected: >= 1.5.0 Not affected: None. Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.6.2, 3.0.0.1
Impact

Carefully crafted input can cause the Range header parsing component in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. Any applications that deal with Range requests (such as streaming applications, or applications that serve files) may be impacted.
Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.
Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.
Patches

To aid users who aren’t able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.

2-0-Fix-ReDoS-in-Rack-Utils.get_byte_ranges.patch - Patch for 2.0 series
2-1-Fix-ReDoS-in-Rack-Utils.get_byte_ranges.patch - Patch for 2.1 series
2-2-Fix-ReDoS-in-Rack-Utils.get_byte_ranges.patch - Patch for 2.2 series
3-0-Fix-ReDoS-in-Rack-Utils.get_byte_ranges.patch - Patch for 3.0 series

🚨 Denial of service via multipart parsing in Rack

There is a denial of service vulnerability in the multipart parsing component of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-44572.

Versions Affected: >= 2.0.0 Not affected: None. Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.6.1, 3.0.0.1
Impact

Carefully crafted input can cause RFC2183 multipart boundary parsing in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. Any applications that parse multipart posts using Rack (virtually all Rails applications) are impacted.
Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.
Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.
Patches

To aid users who aren’t able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.

2-0-Forbid-control-characters-in-attributes.patch - Patch for 2.0 series
2-1-Forbid-control-characters-in-attributes.patch - Patch for 2.1 series
2-2-Forbid-control-characters-in-attributes.patch - Patch for 2.2 series
3-0-Forbid-control-characters-in-attributes.patch - Patch for 3.0 series
Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ rails-html-sanitizer (indirect, 1.6.2 β†’ 1.7.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Rails HTML Sanitizers: Possible XSS vulnerability with certain configurations

Summary

There is a possible cross-site scripting vulnerability in rails-html-sanitizer when the sanitizer is configured to allow an SVG reference element such as <use>. See related GHSA-9wjq-cp2p-hrgf in Loofah, whose SVG local-reference logic rails-html-sanitizer mirrors.

  • Versions affected: >= 1.0.3, < 1.7.1
  • Not affected: < 1.0.3
  • Fixed versions: 1.7.1

Impact

Rails::HTML::PermitScrubber restricts SVG reference elements in the SVG_ALLOW_LOCAL_HREF collection to local, same-document references, but that restriction covered only the xlink:href attribute. Browsers also accept a plain href attribute per the SVG 2 spec, and it was not restricted, so those elements could reference arbitrary external documents. SVG <use> can load and render external SVG content by reference, and if the referenced document is same-origin and contains scripts, it could execute in the context of the sanitized document. <feImage> can load external images, which can be used for tracking.

Applications are impacted only when the allowed tags are overridden to include one of these SVG reference elements, for example <use> or <feImage>. The default allowed tags do not include these SVG elements, so applications using the default configuration are not affected.

Workarounds

Remove the SVG reference elements (such as use and feImage) from the overridden allowed tags. Applications using the default allowed tags are not affected.

References

Credit

Found by maintainer Mike Dalessio during a security audit.

Release Notes

1.7.1

v1.7.1 / 2026-07-15

  • SVG reference elements now restrict both href and xlink:href to local references.

    Previously PermitScrubber restricted only xlink:href on elements in SVG_ALLOW_LOCAL_HREF,
    so a plain href attribute on those elements could reference an external document. Applications
    are only affected if the allowed tags are overridden to include an SVG reference element such as
    use; the default configuration is not affected.

    This change addresses GHSA-cj75-f6xr-r4g7 (CVE requested). The minimum Loofah dependency is now
    ~> 2.25, >= 2.25.2.

    Mike Dalessio @flavorjones

1.7.0

v1.7.0 / 2026-02-24

  • Add Rails::HTML::Sanitizer.allowed_uri? which delegates to Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri?,
    allowing the Rails framework to check URI safety without a direct dependency on Loofah.

    The minimum Loofah dependency is now ~> 2.25.

    Mike Dalessio @flavorjones

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ railties (indirect, 6.1.7.10 β†’ 8.1.3.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ thor (indirect, 1.4.0 β†’ 1.5.0) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Release Notes

1.5.0

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v1.4.0...v1.5.0

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 25 commits:

↗️ timeout (indirect, 0.4.3 β†’ 0.6.1) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Release Notes

0.6.1

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v0.6.0...v0.6.1

0.6.0

What's Changed

  • Suppress warnings in two tests by @olleolleolle in #71
  • Revert "Suppress warnings in two tests" by @nobu in #74
  • Only the timeout method should be public on the Timeout module by @eregon in #76
  • support Ractor by @ko1 in #75
  • Test that Timeout does not expose extra constants by @eregon in #77
  • Revert "Exclude constantly-failing test on x86_64-darwin" by @ko1 in #79
  • Reset the interrupt mask when creating the Timeout thread by @eregon in #80
  • Make Timeout.timeout work in a trap handler on CRuby by @eregon in #81
  • Skip signal test on windows by @byroot in #82
  • Add windows to CI matrix by @byroot in #83
  • Fix failing timeout test by @luke-gruber in #85
  • Restore original signal handler in test_timeout_in_trap_handler by @eregon in #87
  • Run on Windows for all versions and remove old excludes by @eregon in #84

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v0.4.4...v0.6.0

0.5.0

What's Changed

  • Suppress warnings in two tests by @olleolleolle in #71
  • Revert "Suppress warnings in two tests" by @nobu in #74
  • Only the timeout method should be public on the Timeout module by @eregon in #76
  • support Ractor by @ko1 in #75
  • Test that Timeout does not expose extra constants by @eregon in #77

New Contributors

  • @ko1 made their first contribution in #75

Full Changelog: v0.4.4...v0.5.0

0.4.4

What's Changed

  • Gracefully handle a call to ensure_timeout_thread_created in a signal handler by @eregon in #64
  • Add a workflow to sync commits to ruby/ruby by @k0kubun in #69

Full Changelog: v0.4.3...v0.4.4

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 70 commits:

↗️ websocket-driver (indirect, 0.8.0 β†’ 0.8.2) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 websocket-driver-ruby: Denial of service via malformed Host header

Impact

If this library is used to implement a WebSocket server on top of a TCP server, by using the WebSocket::Driver.server() method, then a client can cause the server to crash by sending a Host header that is not a valid host[:port] string. When this happens, a URI::InvalidURIError exception is raised which is not caught, and this can cause the server process to crash if the application does not catch the error from the parse() method itself.

Patches

The issue has been patched in version 0.8.2 by making the request parser catch URI::InvalidURIError and enter an error state if the Host header is malformed. This means the request is considered invalid and should not establish a WebSocket connection.

Workarounds

No known workarounds exist.

Acknowledgements

This issue was discovered and reported by Pranjali Thakur, DepthFirst Security Research Team.

🚨 websocket-driver: Memory exhaustion via abuse of protocol length headers

Impact

The frame format in draft versions of the WebSocket protocol includes a length header that allows an arbitrarily large integer to be encoded as a sequence of bytes with the high bit set. By sending an indefinite sequence of bytes with values 0x80 or above, a server or client can make the other peer parse these bytes into an ever-growing integer. Since Ruby integers are arbitrary precision, this can be used to make a WebSocket connection consume an unbounded amount of memory and lead to the host process running out of memory.

Patches

The issue has been patched in version 0.8.1. All users should upgrade to this version.

Workarounds

No known workarounds exist.

Acknowledgements

This issue was discovered and reported by Pranjali Thakur, DepthFirst Security Research Team.

🚨 websocket-driver: Resource limit bypass via message compression

Impact

If this library is used in tandem with the permessage-deflate extension, a WebSocket server or client can be made to accept messages that are larger than the configured maximum message size. This is because this limit is checked against the message frames' length headers, which give the size of the compressed data, not the size after decompression. This can lead to applications accepting larger messages than expected and exceeding their intended resource usage.

Patches

The issue has been patched in version 0.8.1, by checking the length of messages after they are processed by incoming extensions. All users should upgrade to this version.

Workarounds

No known workarounds exist.

Acknowledgements

This issue was discovered and reported by Pranjali Thakur, DepthFirst Security Research Team.

🚨 websocket-driver: Memory exhaustion in HTTP header parser

Impact

If this library is used to implement a WebSocket server on top of a TCP server (rather than an HTTP server or framework) using the WebSocket::Driver.server() method, or, if it is used to complement a WebSocket client, then a peer can make a single connection consume an unbounded amount of memory by sending an HTTP request or response with a never-ending list of headers. This can lead to the receiving process running out of memory.

Patches

The issue has been patched in version 0.8.1, by limiting the total size of HTTP request/response lines and headers accepted by the parser to 32 kB. All users should upgrade to this version.

Workarounds

No known workarounds exist.

Acknowledgements

This issue was discovered and reported by Pranjali Thakur, DepthFirst Security Research Team.

Release Notes

0.8.2 (from changelog)

  • Gracefully handle malformed Host headers in the Server driver

0.8.1 (from changelog)

  • Close a draft-75/76 connection if a length header grows to exceed the configured max length
  • Fail the connection if a message is larger than the configured max length after extension processing
  • Limit the total HTTP request line and headers size to 32K

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:

↗️ zeitwerk (indirect, 2.6.18 β†’ 2.8.2) Β· Repo Β· Changelog

Release Notes

2.8.1 (from changelog)

  • Replace anonymous block parameters with regular named ones.

    Ruby 3.3.0 has a bug: it does not parse anonymous block parameters, which were introduced in Ruby 3.1.

    While this is a Ruby bug and people could upgrade to 3.3.1, I prefer users just do not hit this. At the end of the day, it is cosmetic.

2.8.0 (from changelog)

  • Adds support for namespace files, nsfiles for short.

    If a loader has an nsfile configured (nil by default):

    loader.nsfile = 'ns.rb' # must be set before setup

    explicit namespaces can be defined by such special file inside their directories:

    my_component/ns.rb     # MyComponent
    my_component/widget.rb # MyComponent::Widget
    

    This may be handy for self-contained units for which a my_component.rb file in the parent directory would feel unnatural.

    If an nsfile is set, you can still define explicit namespaces as always. Both styles can coexist in the project. However, it is an error condition to try to define the same namespace using both conventions.

    For further details, please check the documentation for nsfiles.

  • When a file is shadowed because the constant path it maps to already exists, the location of said constant is included in the log message.

2.7.5 (from changelog)

  • If available, tree traversal is based on Dir.scan, which saves syscalls in common platforms. This method is a recent addition to Ruby contributed by @byroot, so you need to be on Ruby master to leverage this for now.

  • Tree traversal is a tad more performant, regardless of the previous point. Gains are marginal when eager loading, because it is dominated by loading the code, but Zeitwerk::Loader#all_expected_cpaths was 14% faster in some benchmarks, for example.

  • README.md documents how to collect autoloaded constants using an on_load callback.

  • Internal maintenance.

2.7.4 (from changelog)

  • Loaders have to manage disjoint source trees. Therefore, when a root directory is configured Zeitwerk ensures it is not already managed by some other loader. The performance of this validation has been improved.

    Thanks to @ngan for sharing some benchmarks that led to revise this logic.

2.7.3 (from changelog)

  • The helper Zeitwerk::Loader#cpath_expected_at did not work correctly if the inflector had logic that relied on the absolute path of the given file or directory. This has been fixed.

    This bug was found by Codex.

  • Perpetual internal work.

2.7.2 (from changelog)

  • Internal improvements and micro-optimizations.

  • Add stable TruffleRuby to CI.

2.7.1 (from changelog)

  • Micro-optimization in a hot path.

  • Raises Zeitwerk::Error if an autoloaded constant expected to represent a namespace does not store a class or module object.

  • Adds truffleruby-head to CI, except for autoloading thread-safety (see why in oracle/truffleruby#2431).

2.7.0 (from changelog)

  • Explicit namespaces can now also be defined using constant assignments.

    While constant assignments like

    # coordinates.rb

    Coordinates = Data.define(:x, :y)

    worked for most objects, they did not for classes and modules that were also namespaces (i.e., those defined by a file and matching subdirectories). In such cases, their child constants could not be autoloaded.

    This limitation has been removed.

  • TracePoint is no longer used.

  • Requires Ruby 3.2 or later.

    Gems that work with previous versions of Zeitwerk also work with this one. If they support Ruby versions older than 3.2 they can specify a relaxed version constraint for Zeitwerk like "~> 2.6", for example.

    In client projects, Bundler takes the Ruby requirement into account when resolving dependencies, so Gemfile.lock will get one compatible with the Ruby version being used.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

πŸ†• action_text-trix (added, 2.1.19)

πŸ†• connection_pool (added, 3.0.2)

πŸ†• drb (added, 2.2.3)

πŸ†• erb (added, 6.0.6)

πŸ†• io-console (added, 0.8.2)

πŸ†• irb (added, 1.18.0)

πŸ†• json (added, 2.21.1)

πŸ†• pp (added, 0.6.4)

πŸ†• prettyprint (added, 0.2.0)

πŸ†• prism (added, 1.9.0)

πŸ†• rack-session (added, 2.1.2)

πŸ†• rackup (added, 2.3.1)

πŸ†• rbs (added, 4.1.1)

πŸ†• rdoc (added, 8.0.0)

πŸ†• reline (added, 0.6.3)

πŸ†• securerandom (added, 0.4.1)

πŸ†• tsort (added, 0.2.0)

πŸ†• uri (added, 1.1.1)

πŸ†• useragent (added, 0.16.11)

πŸ—‘οΈ method_source (removed)

πŸ—‘οΈ sprockets (removed)

πŸ—‘οΈ sprockets-rails (removed)